Constrained optimization of a preparative ion-exchange step for antibody purification.

Today, the optimization of chromatographic separation is usually based on experimental work and rule of thumb. The process and analytical technology (PAT) initiative, of the US Food and Drug Administration, has provided the opportunity of using model-based approach when designing downstream processing of pharmaceutical substances. A nonlinear chromatography model was used in this study to optimize a preparative ion-exchange separation step involving two components. Separation was simulated with the general rate model employing Langmuir kinetics. Optimization was performed with an indirect method allowing constraints on the purity, thus avoiding sub-optimization, which can lead to noisy objective functions. The six decision variables used in the optimizations were flow rate, loading volume, initial salt concentration in the elution, final salt concentration in the linear elution gradient and the two cut points. A graphical representation of the effect of the decision variables on the objective function was used to verify that the optimization had converged to the true optimum. The optimal operating points, using productivity and yield separately as objective functions, were found and compared with the product of productivity and yield as objective function. The optimum obtained with this objective function had a lower productivity, than the productivity function, but much higher yield, which makes it a good substitute for a cost function.

[1]  E. J. Wilson,et al.  Liquid Mass Transfer at Very Low Reynolds Numbers in Packed Beds , 1966 .

[2]  Lawrence F. Shampine,et al.  The MATLAB ODE Suite , 1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  A. M. Katti,et al.  Development and optimization of industrial scale chromatography for use in manufacturing , 1998 .

[4]  G. Zacchi,et al.  Use of holographic laser interferometry to study the diffusion of polymers in gels. , 2000, Biotechnology and Bioengineering.

[5]  Robert K. Scopes,et al.  Protein Purification: Principles and Practice , 1982 .

[6]  Georges Guiochon,et al.  Optimizing preparative separations at high recovery yield , 1996 .

[7]  Anton P. J. Middelberg,et al.  Economic analysis of immunoadsorption systems , 2001 .

[8]  Jan F. M. Van Impe,et al.  Computer applications in biotechnology 2004 (CAB 9) : a proceedings volume from the 9th IFAC International Symposium, Nancy, France, 28-31 March 2004 , 2005 .

[9]  Christian A Knaack,et al.  A systematic approach to the validation of monoclonal antibody manufacturing processes , 1998 .

[10]  C. Horváth,et al.  Interplay of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions in biopolymer chromatography. Effect of salts on the retention of proteins. , 1989, Journal of chromatography.

[11]  Julian Morris,et al.  Chemical Engineering Research and Design Moving Forward in 2004 , 2004 .

[12]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Numerical methods and modeling for chemical engineers , 1984 .

[13]  M Angela Taipa,et al.  Antibodies and Genetically Engineered Related Molecules: Production and Purification , 2004, Biotechnology progress.

[14]  Steven M. Cramer,et al.  Optimization of preparative ion-exchange chromatography of proteins: linear gradient separations , 1996 .

[15]  Steven M. Cramer,et al.  Steric mass‐action ion exchange: Displacement profiles and induced salt gradients , 1992 .

[16]  A Felinger,et al.  Comparing the optimum performance of the different modes of preparative liquid chromatography. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[17]  H. Miller As biotech turns 20... , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  Octave Levenspiel,et al.  The chemical reactor minibook , 1979 .

[19]  Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Optimization of gradient elution conditions in multicomponent preparative liquid chromatography. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[20]  Anita M. Katti,et al.  Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography , 1994 .

[21]  Georges Guiochon,et al.  Preparative liquid chromatography. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[22]  Susan Eitelman,et al.  Matlab Version 6.5 Release 13. The MathWorks, Inc., 3 Apple Hill Dr., Natick, MA 01760-2098; 508/647-7000, Fax 508/647-7001, www.mathworks.com , 2003 .

[23]  C. Fargues,et al.  Adsorption of BSA and Hemoglobin on Hydroxyapatite Support: Equilibria and Multicomponent Dynamic Adsorption , 1998 .

[24]  J. Egly,et al.  Screening of various mammalian cell culture media to establish a downstream purification scheme. , 1991, Journal of immunological methods.

[25]  S M Cramer,et al.  Optimization of ion-exchange displacement separations. I. Validation of an iterative scheme and its use as a methods development tool. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  Gary Walsh,et al.  Pharmaceutical biotechnology products approved within the European Union. , 2003, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[27]  Anders Axelsson,et al.  Methodologies for model calibration to assist the design of a preparative ion-exchange step for antibody purification. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[28]  A Jungbauer,et al.  Fundamental questions in optimizing ion-exchange chromatography of proteins using computer-aided process design. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[29]  G. Zacchi,et al.  Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry: A Tool for Determining Diffusion and Partition Coefficients for Proteins in Gels , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[30]  James T. Hsu,et al.  Experimental studies of restricted protein diffusion in an agarose matrix , 1992 .

[31]  A. Staby,et al.  Comparison of chromatographic ion-exchange resins , 2000 .

[32]  D. Wetlaufer,et al.  Relationship between isocratic and gradient retention times in the high-performance ion-exchange chromatography of proteins. Theory and experiment. , 1986, Journal of chromatography.