Can Information Technology Bridge Knowledge Distance in Organizational Open Innovation? An Absorptive Capacity Perspective

Nowadays there is an increasing trend of leveraging on external knowledge for innovation, which is termed as open innovation. While open innovation can help organizations obtain complementary knowledge from collaborators, it is likely to have inherent challenges in knowledge absorption. The differences of interorganizational knowledge can seriously inhibit the ability of the focal organization to innovate via external knowledge. While the concept of open innovation has attracted significant attention, there remains a paucity of research on how information technology (IT) can address the knowledge absorption challenges. Drawing on absorptive capacity and organizational learning literature, this study examines the effects of interorganizational knowledge distance on organizational open innovation performance and different influential roles of four IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Our study contributes to existing research by focusing on the interplay of knowledge distance and IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Results of the study will also have important managerial implications for open innovation practitioners.

[1]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[2]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[3]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[4]  CassimanBruno,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy , 2006 .

[5]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[6]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[7]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[8]  Shu Han,et al.  Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge Capabilities , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Landon Kleis,et al.  Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[12]  Rachelle C. Sampson.  R&D Alliances & Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation , 2003 .

[13]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Guy Kawasaki,et al.  The Open Innovation Revolution: Essentials, Roadblocks, and Leadership Skills , 2010 .

[15]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[16]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[19]  R. Veugelers,et al.  The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness , 2005 .

[20]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[21]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[22]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Complementary Technologies, Knowledge Relatedness, and Invention Outcomes in High Technology Mergers and Acquisitions , 2009 .

[23]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[24]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[25]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[26]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[27]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[28]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Judy E. Scott.  Facilitating Interorganizational Learning with Information Technology , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[31]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[32]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[33]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[34]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[35]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[36]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Competitive Dynamics in Electronic Networks: A Model and the Case of Interorganizational Systems , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[37]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[38]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[39]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .