Motor imagery in blind subjects: The influence of the previous visual experience

Mental simulation of movements has been widely used to infer about representational aspects of action. On a daily basis, motor planning and execution depends crucially both upon vision and kinesthesia. What if the former is lost? In this study we investigate the physiological changes induced during a mental simulation task in subjects with early and late onset blindness, analyzing simultaneously stabilometric (body sway), electromyographic (EMG, lateral gastrocnemius) and eletrocardiographic (ECG) signals. Subjects were asked to stand up on a force platform and instructed either to: rest during 20s; count mentally from 1 to 15; imagine themselves executing a bilateral plantar flexion 15 times and execute the same movement 15 times. Discriminant analysis was employed to have access to the differences in the groups with respect to heart rate variability (HRV), EMG and body sway measurements for each condition. We found an overall correct classification of 100 and 90.9%, respectively, for the stabilometric parameters and HRV. This result was found only for the mental simulation task (p<0.05), being absent for resting, counting and executing. Previous studies have shown that motor simulation in a kinesthetic mode strongly associates with somatic and autonomic changes. In late blind subjects, however, movement simulation would tend to unfold with the use of both visual and kinesthetic representations. Thus, our results suggest that early and late blind subjects make use of distinct body representations during motor imagery.

[1]  J. Nadal,et al.  Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  Early Vision Impairs Tactile Perception in the Blind , 2004, Current Biology.

[4]  E. Volchan,et al.  [Mental stimulation strategy affects postural control]. , 2003, Revista brasileira de psiquiatria.

[5]  L. Parsons,et al.  Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET , 1995, Nature.

[6]  Marco Schieppati,et al.  Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  M. Jeannerod The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Marie-Chantal Wanet-Defalque,et al.  Abilities and strategies of blind and sighted subjects in visuo-spatial imagery. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[9]  M Jeannerod,et al.  Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  K Yabe,et al.  Automatic postural response systems in individuals with congenital total blindness. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[11]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  T.E. Prieto,et al.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Manabu Honda,et al.  Critical Period for Cross-Modal Plasticity in Blind Humans: A Functional MRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  S. Small,et al.  Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Mental motor imagery and the body schema: evidence for proprioceptive dominance , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  L. Parsons Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  E. R Gizewski,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity for sensory and motor activation patterns in blind subjects , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Motor and Visual Imagery as Two Complementary but Neurally Dissociable Mental Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Corticospinal facilitation during first and third person imagery , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  M. Hallett,et al.  Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans , 1997, Nature.

[23]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Behavioral and neuroplastic changes in the blind: evidence for functionally relevant cross-modal interactions , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[24]  Mark Hollins,et al.  Styles of mental imagery in blind adults , 1985, Neuropsychologia.