Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers

Flexible adaptation of behaviour is highly required in some sports, such as fencing. In particular, stimulus discrimination and motor response selection and inhibition processes are crucial. We investigated the neural mechanisms responsible for fencers' fast and flexible behaviour recording event-related potentials (ERPs) in discriminative reaction task (DRT, Go/No-go task) and simple reaction task (SRT) to visual stimuli. In the DRT, in addition to faster RTs measured in fencers with respect to control subjects, three main electrophysiological differences were found. First, attentional modulation of the visual processing taking place in the occipital lobes and reaching a peak at 170 ms was enhanced in the athletes group. Second, the activity in the posterior cingulate gyrus, associated with the stimulus discrimination stage, started earlier in fencers than controls (150 ms versus 200 ms) and the peak had larger amplitude. Third, the activity at the level of the prefrontal cortex (time range: 250-350 ms), associated with response selection stage and particularly with motor inhibition process, was stronger in fencers. No differences between athletes and controls were found in the SRT for both ERPs and RTs. Concluding, the fencers' ability to cope to the opponent feint switching quickly from an intended action to a new more appropriate action is likely due to a faster stimulus discrimination facilitated by higher attention and by stronger inhibition activity in prefrontal cortex.

[1]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb , 1986, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Deciding not to GO: neuronal correlates of response selection in a GO/NOGO task in primate premotor and parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  No‐go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  K. Nakahara,et al.  A rapid presentation event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of response inhibition in macaque monkeys , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[6]  G. Zaccara,et al.  Abnormal visual event-related potentials in obsessive-compulsive disorder without panic disorder or depression comorbidity. , 2000, Journal of psychiatric research.

[7]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Posterior cingulate, precuneal and retrosplenial cortices: cytology and components of the neural network correlates of consciousness. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[9]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Neural correlates of impulsive-violent behavior: an event-related potential study , 2005, Neuroreport.

[11]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  L R Williams,et al.  Response timing and muscular coordination in fencing: a comparison of elite and novice fencers. , 2000, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[13]  C. Connine,et al.  inhibition , 2020, Catalysis from A to Z.

[14]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[15]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[17]  WILLIAM B. CARPENTER Dardanelles and Bosphorus Undercurrent , 1872, Nature.

[18]  D. Pizzagalli,et al.  When ‘go’ and ‘nogo’ are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  Koji Inui,et al.  Effects of ISI and stimulus probability on event-related go/nogo potentials after somatosensory stimulation , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[21]  Mario Liotti,et al.  Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  J Leon Kenemans,et al.  Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.