Differences in perceived shape from shading correlate with activity in early visual areas

The perception of shape from shading depends on the orientation of the shading gradient [1] [2] [3] [4]. Displays composed of elements with vertically oriented shading gradients of opposite polarity produce a strong and stable percept of 'concave' and 'convex' elements. If the shading gradients are rotated 90 degrees , the depth percept is reduced and appears much more ambiguous. Results from psychophysical [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6], neuropsychological [7] and computational studies [8] [9] suggest that the perception of shape from shading engages specific mechanisms in early cortical visual areas. In a three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study at 1.5 Tesla using a three-dimensional, interleaved-echoplanar imaging technique and a surface radio frequency (RF) coil placed under the visual cortex, we investigated the activity in these early visual areas associated with viewing shape from shading displays at two different orientations. We found significantly greater activation in area V1 and neighbouring low-level visual areas of cortex when subjects viewed displays that led to weak and unstable depth percepts than when they viewed displays that led to strong and stable depth percepts.

[1]  R. Vautin,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of color categorization in areas V1, V2 and V4 of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  S J Riederer,et al.  Interleaved echo planar imaging on a standard MRI system , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Deborah J. Aks,et al.  Visual search for direction of shading is influenced by apparent depth , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[5]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  R. Desimone,et al.  The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  D C Plaut,et al.  Simulating brain damage. , 1993, Scientific American.

[8]  I P Howard,et al.  Shape from Shading in Different Frames of Reference , 1990, Perception.

[9]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Michael J. Hawken,et al.  Macaque VI neurons can signal ‘illusory’ contours , 1993, Nature.

[11]  I. Riches,et al.  The effects of visual stimulation and memory on neurons of the hippocampal formation and the neighboring parahippocampal gyrus and inferior temporal cortex of the primate , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  A neurological dissociation between shape from shading and shape from edges , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Network model of shape-from-shading: neural function arises from both receptive and projective fields , 1988, Nature.

[14]  J. Braun Shape-from-shading is independent of visual attention and may be a 'texton'. , 1993, Spatial vision.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Functional Brain Imaging Studies of Cortical Mechanisms for Memory , 1995, Science.

[16]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[17]  G. Mckinnon Ultrafast interleaved gradient‐echo‐planar imaging on a standard scanner , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  A. F. Rossi,et al.  The representation of brightness in primary visual cortex. , 1996, Science.

[19]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Neural network model of visual cortex for determining surface curvature from images of shaded surfaces , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.