Does fractional anisotropy have better noise immunity characteristics than relative anisotropy in diffusion tensor MRI? An analytical approach

Fractional anisotropy (FA) and relative anisotropy (RA) are the two most commonly used scalar measures of anisotropy in diffusion tensor (DT) MRI. While a few published studies have shown that FA has superior noise immunity relative to RA, no theoretical basis has been proposed to explain this behavior. In the current study, the diffusion tensor invariants were used to derive a simple analytical expression that directly relates RA and FA. An analysis based on that analytical expression demonstrated that the FA images have a higher signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) than RA for any value of tensor anisotropy RA or FA > 0. This theoretical behavior was verified using both Monte Carlo simulations and bootstrap analysis of DT‐MRI data acquired in a spherical water phantom and normal human subjects. Magn Reson Med 51:413–417, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Donald E. Sands,et al.  Vectors and Tensors in Crystallography , 1982 .

[2]  O Nalcioglu,et al.  A modified pulse sequence for in vivo diffusion imaging with reduced motion artifacts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[4]  P. Basser,et al.  Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  E. Akbudak,et al.  Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: A general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  M. I. Smith,et al.  A study of rotationally invariant and symmetric indices of diffusion anisotropy. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  Bahn.  Invariant and orthonormal scalar measures derived from magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[8]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Human acute cerebral ischemia: detection of changes in water diffusion anisotropy by using MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[9]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Orientation‐independent diffusion imaging without tensor diagonalization: Anisotropy definitions based on physical attributes of the diffusion ellipsoid , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  D. Parker,et al.  A geometric analysis of diffusion tensor measurements of the human brain , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  S. Skare,et al.  Noise considerations in the determination of diffusion tensor anisotropy. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  M E Bastin,et al.  Selecting an appropriate anisotropy index for displaying diffusion tensor imaging data with improved contrast and sensitivity , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  A. Anderson.  Theoretical analysis of the effects of noise on diffusion tensor imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  A L Alexander,et al.  Analytical computation of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors in DT-MRI. , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[15]  D L Parker,et al.  Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion‐tensor MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  J. Illes,et al.  Diffusion-tensor imaging of cognitive performance , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  C. Sotak,et al.  The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury – a review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[18]  Khader M Hasan,et al.  Computation of the fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity maps without tensor decoding and diagonalization: Theoretical analysis and validation , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  P. Basser,et al.  Parametric and non-parametric statistical analysis of DT-MRI data. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.