How Does Chirality Determine the Selective Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 6? A Lesson from Trichostatin A Enantiomers Based on Molecular Dynamics.

Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) plays a key role in a variety of neurological disorders, which makes it attractive drug target for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and memory/learning impairment. The selectivity of HDAC6 inhibitors (sHDAC6Is) are widely considered to be susceptible to the sizes of their Cap group and the physicochemical properties of their linker or zinc-binding group, which makes the discovery of new sHDAC6Is extremely difficult. With the discovery of the distinct selectivity between Trichostatin A (TSA) enantiomers, the chirality residing in the connective units between TSA's Cap and linker shows a great impact on its selectivity. However, the mechanism underlining ( S)-TSA's selectivity is still elusive, and the way chirality switches the selective ( S)-TSA to nonselective ( R)-TSA is unknown. In this study, multiple computational approaches were collectively applied to explore, validate, and differentiate the binding modes of two TSA enantiomers in HDACs (especially the HDAC6) at atomic level. First, two nonconservative residues (G200/M205 and Y197/F202 in HDAC1/6) in loop3 and four conservative residues deep inside the hydrophobic binding pocket were discovered as the decisive residues of ( S)-TSA's selectivity toward HDAC6. Then, a novel mechanism underlying the selectivity of ( S)-TSA toward HDAC6 was proposed, which was composed of the trigger by two nonconservative residues F202 and M205 in HDAC6 and a subsequently improved fit of ( S)-TSA deep inside HDAC6's hydrophobic binding pocket. TSA enantiomers were used as a molecular probe to explore the mechanism underlying sHDAC6Is' selectivity in this study. Because of their decisive roles in ( S)-TSA's selectivity to HDAC6, both F202 and M205 in HDAC6 should be especially considered in the discovery of novel sHDAC6Is.

[1]  William M. Grady,et al.  Epigenetic Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: Emerging Biomarkers. , 2015, Gastroenterology.

[2]  Youyong Li,et al.  Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[3]  Christopher W Murray,et al.  Predicting "Hot" and "Warm" Spots for Fragment Binding. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Revealing vilazodone's binding mechanism underlying its partial agonism to the 5-HT1A receptor in the treatment of major depressive disorder. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[5]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[6]  Kyle V. Butler,et al.  Rational design and simple chemistry yield a superior, neuroprotective HDAC6 inhibitor, tubastatin A. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Exploring the Binding Mechanism of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Negative Allosteric Modulators in Clinical Trials by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. , 2018, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[8]  J. Chern,et al.  Quinazolin-2,4-dione-Based Hydroxamic Acids as Selective Histone Deacetylase-6 Inhibitors for Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  E. Thomas,et al.  Focal Nature of Neurological Disorders Necessitates Isotype-Selective Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors , 2009, Molecular Neurobiology.

[10]  Ju-Hee Lee,et al.  Development of a histone deacetylase 6 inhibitor and its biological effects , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Ricky W. Johnstone,et al.  Histone-deacetylase inhibitors: novel drugs for the treatment of cancer , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Differentiating Physicochemical Properties between Addictive and Nonaddictive ADHD Drugs Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies. , 2017, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[13]  Nicholas F LaRusso,et al.  HDAC6 inhibition restores ciliary expression and decreases tumor growth. , 2013, Cancer research.

[14]  Thomas A. Miller,et al.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  P. Kollman,et al.  Combined molecular mechanical and continuum solvent approach (MM-PBSA/GBSA) to predict ligand binding , 2000 .

[16]  B. Goh,et al.  Combined use of irinotecan with histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat could cause severe toxicity by inhibiting SN-38 glucuronidation via UGT1A1 , 2017, Oncotarget.

[17]  D. E. Olson,et al.  Potent and selective inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) does not require a surface-binding motif. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  S. Cremers,et al.  Dual Targeting of Protein Degradation Pathways with the Selective HDAC6 Inhibitor ACY-1215 and Bortezomib Is Synergistic in Lymphoma , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Rational Design of Particle Mesh Ewald Compatible Lennard-Jones Parameters for +2 Metal Cations in Explicit Solvent. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[21]  S. Minucci,et al.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors and the promise of epigenetic (and more) treatments for cancer , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  Weiliang Zhu,et al.  Zinc ion-induced conformational changes in new Delphi metallo-β-lactamase 1 probed by molecular dynamics simulations and umbrella sampling. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[23]  Y. Li,et al.  Identification of a Novel Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5 Inhibitor in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer by Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2018, Front. Pharmacol..

[24]  Chang-Gyu Hahn,et al.  HDAC6 Regulates Glucocorticoid Receptor Signaling in Serotonin Pathways with Critical Impact on Stress Resilience , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  U. Koch,et al.  Unraveling the hidden catalytic activity of vertebrate class IIa histone deacetylases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Histone deacetylases and their inhibitors in cancer, neurological diseases and immune disorders. , 2014, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[27]  William M. Grady,et al.  Epigenetics and colorectal cancer , 2011, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[28]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[29]  Arunasree M. Kalle,et al.  Overexpressed HDAC8 in cervical cancer cells shows functional redundancy of tubulin deacetylation with HDAC6 , 2018, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[30]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  M. Deardorff,et al.  Compromised Structure and Function of HDAC8 Mutants Identified in Cornelia de Lange Syndrome Spectrum Disorders , 2014, ACS chemical biology.

[32]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Prediction of the binding mode and resistance profile for a dual-target pyrrolyl diketo acid scaffold against HIV-1 integrase and reverse-transcriptase-associated ribonuclease H. , 2018, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[33]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Comparison of computational model and X-ray crystal structure of human serotonin transporter: potential application for the pharmacology of human monoamine transporters , 2017 .

[34]  W. Robberecht,et al.  HDAC6 inhibition reverses axonal transport defects in motor neurons derived from FUS-ALS patients , 2017, Nature Communications.

[35]  D. Christianson,et al.  Unusual zinc-binding mode of HDAC6-selective hydroxamate inhibitors , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Exploring the Inhibitory Mechanism of Approved Selective Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors and Reboxetine Enantiomers by Molecular Dynamics Study , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[37]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  Substituent Effects in π−π Interactions: Sandwich and T-Shaped Configurations , 2004 .

[38]  G. Giannini,et al.  ST7612AA1, a thioacetate-ω(γ-lactam carboxamide) derivative selected from a novel generation of oral HDAC inhibitors. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi,et al.  Loss of Deacetylation Activity of Hdac6 Affects Emotional Behavior in Mice , 2012, PloS one.

[40]  Histone deacetylase , 1993, FEBS letters.

[41]  Jaroslav Koča,et al.  Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA, and QM-MM/GBSA Approaches on Protein/Carbohydrate Complexes: Effect of Implicit Solvent Models, QM Methods, and Entropic Contributions. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[42]  Q. Zou,et al.  Gene2vec: gene subsequence embedding for prediction of mammalian N6-methyladenosine sites from mRNA , 2018, RNA.

[43]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Taking into Account the Ion-induced Dipole Interaction in the Nonbonded Model of Ions. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[44]  Ø. Bruserud,et al.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors in cancer treatment: a review of the clinical toxicity and the modulation of gene expression in cancer cell. , 2007, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[45]  A. M. Riley,et al.  supplementary figures , 2018 .

[46]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A Bifunctional Role for the UHRF1 UBL Domain in the Control of Hemi-methylated DNA-Dependent Histone Ubiquitylation. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[47]  Christophe Romier,et al.  Novel spiroindoline HDAC inhibitors: Synthesis, molecular modelling and biological studies. , 2018, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[48]  Xiangrong Liu,et al.  Sc-ncDNAPred: A Sequence-Based Predictor for Identifying Non-coding DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[49]  Yuzong Chen,et al.  What Contributes to Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors' Dual-Targeting Mechanism? The Key Role of Transmembrane Domain 6 in Human Serotonin and Norepinephrine Transporters Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. , 2018, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[50]  Chengzhang Wang,et al.  Novel urushiol derivatives as HDAC8 inhibitors: rational design, virtual screening, molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies , 2018, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[51]  J. Correa-Basurto,et al.  Insights into structural features of HDAC1 and its selectivity inhibition elucidated by Molecular dynamic simulation and Molecular Docking , 2019, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[52]  M. Yoshida,et al.  Structural specificity for biological activity of trichostatin A, a specific inhibitor of mammalian cell cycle with potent differentiation-inducing activity in Friend leukemia cells. , 1990, The Journal of antibiotics.

[53]  Bo Li,et al.  NOREVA: normalization and evaluation of MS-based metabolomics data , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[54]  Sylvia Tippmann,et al.  Programming tools: Adventures with R , 2014, Nature.

[55]  A. V. van Kuilenburg,et al.  Histone deacetylases (HDACs): characterization of the classical HDAC family. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[56]  Zhen Yan,et al.  Histone deacetylase 6 gates the synaptic action of acute stress in prefrontal cortex , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[57]  Ying Ju,et al.  Predicting Diabetes Mellitus With Machine Learning Techniques , 2018, Front. Genet..

[58]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Clinical trials, progression-speed differentiating features and swiftness rule of the innovative targets of first-in-class drugs , 2019, Briefings Bioinform..

[59]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[60]  P. Kollman,et al.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[61]  Jijun Tang,et al.  Prediction of human protein subcellular localization using deep learning , 2017, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[62]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Recent Advances and Challenges of the Drugs Acting on Monoamine Transporters. , 2018, Current medicinal chemistry.

[63]  Xiangxiang Zeng,et al.  Prediction of potential disease-associated microRNAs using structural perturbation method , 2017, bioRxiv.

[64]  K. Merz,et al.  Systematic Parameterization of Monovalent Ions Employing the Nonbonded Model. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[65]  J. Kalin,et al.  Development and therapeutic implications of selective histone deacetylase 6 inhibitors. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[66]  M. Amanlou,et al.  A comparative study based on docking and molecular dynamics simulations over HDAC-tubulin dual inhibitors. , 2016, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[67]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Histone deacetylase 6 in cancer , 2018, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[68]  E. Olson,et al.  The many roles of histone deacetylases in development and physiology: implications for disease and therapy , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[69]  R. Mannella,et al.  Langevin stabilization of molecular-dynamics simulations of polymers by means of quasisymplectic algorithms. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[70]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Prediction of GluN2B-CT1290-1310/DAPK1 Interaction by Protein–Peptide Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation , 2018, Molecules.

[71]  J. Vickers,et al.  The HDAC6 Inhibitor Trichostatin A Acetylates Microtubules and Protects Axons From Excitotoxin-Induced Degeneration in a Compartmented Culture Model , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[72]  Bruce J. Melancon,et al.  Structural insights into HDAC6 tubulin deacetylation and its selective inhibition. , 2016, Nature chemical biology.

[73]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Parameterization of Highly Charged Metal Ions Using the 12-6-4 LJ-Type Nonbonded Model in Explicit Water , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[74]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Performance Evaluation and Online Realization of Data-driven Normalization Methods Used in LC/MS based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[75]  Yonggang Chen,et al.  Coupling of Zinc-Binding and Secondary Structure in Nonfibrillar Aβ40 Peptide Oligomerization , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[76]  Stuart L Schreiber,et al.  Domain-selective small-molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-mediated tubulin deacetylation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  D. Christianson,et al.  Multicomponent Synthesis and Binding Mode of Imidazo[1,2- a]pyridine-Capped Selective HDAC6 Inhibitors. , 2018, Organic letters.

[78]  Q. Zou,et al.  Research progress in protein posttranslational modification site prediction. , 2018, Briefings in functional genomics.

[79]  C. Blackburn,et al.  Potent histone deacetylase inhibitors derived from 4-(aminomethyl)-N-hydroxybenzamide with high selectivity for the HDAC6 isoform. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[80]  Al-Warthan Abdulrahman,et al.  Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Cancer , 2018 .

[81]  Gang Fu,et al.  PubChem Substance and Compound databases , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[82]  J. Correa-Basurto,et al.  Structural and energetic basis for the inhibitory selectivity of both catalytic domains of dimeric HDAC6 , 2019, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[83]  Dan Li,et al.  Revealing the favorable dissociation pathway of type II kinase inhibitors via enhanced sampling simulations and two-end-state calculations , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[84]  J. R. Somoza,et al.  Structural snapshots of human HDAC8 provide insights into the class I histone deacetylases. , 2004, Structure.

[85]  S. Patra,et al.  Histone Deacetylases , 2014, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[86]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Computational characterization of the selective inhibition of human norepinephrine and serotonin transporters by an escitalopram scaffold. , 2018, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[87]  Peer Bork,et al.  Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[88]  G. Bates,et al.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors as therapeutics for polyglutamine disorders , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[89]  O. Kwon,et al.  Differentially expressed genes and morphological changes during lengthened immobilization in rat soleus muscle. , 2007, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[90]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Computational identification of the binding mechanism of a triple reuptake inhibitor amitifadine for the treatment of major depressive disorder. , 2018, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[91]  Sungjoo Kim,et al.  CKD-506, a novel HDAC6-selective inhibitor, improves renal outcomes and survival in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[92]  M. Sweet,et al.  Towards isozyme-selective HDAC inhibitors for interrogating disease. , 2012, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[93]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Clinical Success of Drug Targets Prospectively Predicted by In Silico Study. , 2017, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[94]  M. Kaliszczak,et al.  The HDAC6 inhibitor C1A modulates autophagy substrates in diverse cancer cells and induces cell death , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[95]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[96]  Ling Zhang,et al.  The role of HDAC6 in Alzheimer's disease. , 2012, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[97]  Xiaofeng Li,et al.  ANPELA: analysis and performance assessment of the label-free quantification workflow for metaproteomic studies , 2019, Briefings Bioinform..

[98]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Differentiating physicochemical properties between NDRIs and sNRIs clinically important for the treatment of ADHD. , 2017, Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects.

[99]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Identification of the inhibitory mechanism of FDA approved selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an insight from molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[100]  Xiujiao Wang,et al.  Recent advances in the discovery of potent and selective HDAC6 inhibitors. , 2018, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[101]  R. Friesner,et al.  Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides† , 2001 .

[102]  M. Rosales-Hernández,et al.  Searching the conformational complexity and binding properties of HDAC6 through docking and molecular dynamic simulations , 2017, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[103]  D. Christianson,et al.  Histone deacetylase 6 structure and molecular basis of catalysis and inhibition , 2016, Nature chemical biology.

[104]  A. Kozikowski,et al.  Selective histone deacetylase 6 inhibitors bearing substituted urea linkers inhibit melanoma cell growth. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[105]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[106]  Ø. Bruserud,et al.  Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment: A Review of the Clinical Toxicity and the Modulation of Gene Expression in Cancer Cells , 2007 .