Melody recognition at fast and slow tempos: Effects of age, experience, and familiarity

Eighty-one listeners defined by three age ranges (18–30, 31–59, and over 60 years) and three levels of musical experience performed an immediate recognition task requiring the detection of alterations in melodies. On each trial, a brief melody was presented, followed 5 sec later by a test stimulus that either was identical to the target or had two pitches changed, for a same-different judgment. Each melody pair was presented at 0.6 note/sec, 3.0 notes/sec, or 6.0 notes/sec. Performance was better with familiar melodies than with unfamiliar melodies. Overall performance declined slightly with age and improved substantially with increasing experience, in agreement with earlier results in an identification task. Tempo affected performance on familiar tunes (moderate was best), but not on unfamiliar tunes. We discuss these results in terms of theories of dynamic attending, cognitive slowing, and working memory in aging.

[1]  Neil Charness,et al.  Expertise and age effects on knowledge activation in chess. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[2]  James C. Bartlett.  Limits on losses in face recognition. , 1993 .

[3]  W. Jay Dowling,et al.  Context Effects on Melody Recognition: Scale-Step versus Interval Representations , 1986 .

[4]  E. MacColl,et al.  Travellers' Songs from England and Scotland , 1977 .

[5]  E. Meinz,et al.  Experience-based attenuation of age-related differences in music cognition tasks. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[6]  Ruth O'Hara,et al.  Cognitive ability, expertise, and age differences in following air-traffic control instructions. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[7]  T. Salthouse.  Why do adult age differences increase with task complexity , 1992 .

[8]  Andrea R. Halpern,et al.  Perceived and Imagined Tempos of Familiar Songs , 1988 .

[9]  W. Dowling,et al.  The time course of recognition of novel melodies , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Aging and experience in the recognition of musical transpositions. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[11]  Paul Verhaeghen,et al.  Aging, Task Complexity, and Efficiency Modes: The Influence of Working Memory Involvement on Age Differences in Response Times for Verbal and Visuospatial Tasks , 2006, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[12]  W. Dowling,et al.  Memory and the Experience of Hearing Music , 2001 .

[13]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Measures of sensitivity based on a single hit rate and false alarm rate: The accuracy, precision, and robustness of′,Az, andA’ , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  W. J. Bowling.  Scale and Contour : Two Components of a Theory of Memory for Melodies , 2005 .

[15]  E. Goldstein.  Blackwell handbook of perception , 2001 .

[16]  J. J. Ryan,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III , 2001 .

[17]  Adam Sanborn,et al.  Environmental support promotes expertise-based mitigation of age differences on pilot communication tasks. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[18]  Michel Isingrini,et al.  Age-Related Cognitive Slowing: The Role of Spontaneous Tempo and Processing Speed , 2004, Experimental aging research.

[19]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Dissociating Age-related Changes in Cognitive Strategy and Neural Efficiency Using Event- related fMRI , 2005, Cortex.

[20]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  When expertise reduces age differences in performance , 1994 .

[21]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Aging and memory for music: A review , 2002 .

[22]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[23]  R. West,et al.  Neural correlates of age-related declines in the formation and realization of delayed intentions. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[24]  Mari Tervaniemi,et al.  Grouping of Sequential SoundsAn Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Cook,et al.  Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins.  The perception of music. , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[27]  T. Salthouse.  Aging and measures of processing speed , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[28]  James A. Bashford,et al.  Melodic and Nonmelodic Sequences of Tones: Effects of Duration on Perception , 1991 .

[29]  J. Swets.  The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology , 1973, Science.

[30]  Margaret Mortz,et al.  Time-expanded speech and speech recognition in older adults. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[31]  Nathaniel S. Miller,et al.  The time of our lives: life span development of timing and event tracking. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  I. Peretz,et al.  Episodic Encoding in Normal Aging: Attentional Resources Hypothesis Extended to Musical Material , 2006, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[33]  W. Dowling,et al.  Aiming attention in pitch and time in the perception of interleaved melodies , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Hillary D. Schwarb,et al.  The influence of aging and frontal function on the neural correlates of regulative and evaluative aspects of cognitive control. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[35]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[36]  Denise C. Park,et al.  The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. , 2000 .

[37]  Identification of speeded and slowed familiar melodies by younger, middle-aged, and older musicians and nonmusicians. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[38]  P. Verhaeghen,et al.  Aging and verbal memory span: a meta-analysis. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.