Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level.

To determine consumer sensory acceptance and value of beef steaks differing in marbling level (high = upper USDA Choice and low = USDA Select), but similar in Warner-Bratzler shear value, consumers in Chicago and San Francisco (n = 124 per city) evaluated two matched pairs of high- and low-marbled strip steaks, and had the opportunity to participate in a silent, sealed-bid auction to purchase steaks from the same strip loins as the samples. Consumers who purchased steaks also evaluated the steaks when prepared in their homes. Based on overall acceptability ratings, consumers were categorized into three groups: 1) those who consistently found high marbling more acceptable, 2) those who consistently found low marbling more acceptable, and 3) those who were indifferent. Consumers who evaluated at least one high-marbled and one low-marbled sample in their home were included in an evaluation environment analysis (n = 50). High-marbled steaks were rated higher (P < 0.01) in juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability than low-marbled steaks. In Chicago, consumers tended to bid more (P < 0.10) for high-marbled steaks, whereas consumers in San Francisco did not. Consumers who found high-marbled steaks more acceptable and those who found low-marbled steaks more acceptable were willing to pay more (P < 0.01) for the more acceptable product. Consumers who evaluated high- and low-marbled samples in both the laboratory and home environments rated high- and low-marbled samples similar (P > 0.10) in flavor, juiciness, tenderness and overall acceptability when evaluating the steaks in their homes. In addition, these consumers were willing to pay similar (P > 0.10) amounts for high- and low-marbled samples in both environments. Overall, consumers found high-marbled steaks to be more acceptable than low-marbled steaks in flavor and overall acceptability when tenderness differences were minimized in the laboratory environment. Consumers were willing to pay more for their preference, whether that preference was for high-marbled or low-marbled steaks.

[1]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[2]  W. Huffman,et al.  Economic Values of Pork Attributes: Hedonic Price Analysis of Experimental Auction Data , 1996 .

[3]  Dale J. Menkhaus,et al.  An Empirical Application of Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research , 1992 .

[4]  W. Umberger,et al.  Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Flavor in Beef Steaks: An Experimental Economics Approach , 2001 .

[5]  H R Cross,et al.  Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[6]  V. Smith,et al.  INCENTIVES AND BEHAVIOR IN ENGLISH, DUTCH AND SEALED‐BID AUCTIONS , 1980 .

[7]  K. L. Huffman,et al.  Effect of beef tenderness on consumer satisfaction with steaks consumed in the home and restaurant. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Kenneth Helrick,et al.  Official methods of analysis , 1990 .

[9]  D. S. Hale,et al.  NATIONAL CONSUMER RETAIL BEEF STUDY: INTERACTION OF TRIM LEVEL, PRICE AND GRADE ON CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF BEEF STEAKS AND ROASTS , 1989 .

[10]  J. O. Reagan,et al.  Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[11]  E. Dransfield,et al.  Consumer selection of steaks as influenced by information and price index , 1998 .

[12]  V. Smith,et al.  Experimental Tests of an Allocation Mechanism for Private, Public or Externality Goods* , 1984 .

[13]  H. Cross,et al.  National Consumer Retail Beef Study: Palatability Evaluations of Beef Loin Steaks that Differed in Marbling , 1987 .

[14]  W. Horwitz.  Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[15]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  An audit of retail beef loin steak tenderness conducted in eight U.S. cities. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[16]  K. Eskridge,et al.  Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color. , 2004, Journal of animal science.