Effect of Synthetic Aphid Alarm Pheromone (E)-&bgr;-Farnesene on Development and Reproduction of Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae)

Abstract The synthetic aphid alarm pheromone (E)-&bgr;-farnesene (EBF) is released by aphids in response to predation or other disturbances that occur in the colony. This is presumed to benefit the population by allowing increased survival of related individuals taking successful evasive action after perception of the pheromone. The effect of pheromone perception by aphids in the absence of real threats was investigated to determine the baseline effect of this communication on aphid survival, development, and fecundity in the laboratory. All four nymphal stages of cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae), were stimulated with EBF. No significant difference in survival rates was observed in the aphids stimulated with EBF compared with the untreated control. Developmental times of the aphids were significantly prolonged in first and third instars when they were stimulated with EBF. Significantly lower fecundity and lighter weight of adult aphids were observed in aphids stimulated with EBF at as first instars compared with untreated controls and other instars. Results indicate that exposure of the first instar of A. gossipii to the synthetic alarm pheromone adversely affects subsequent development and fecundity of the population. This reduces aphid fitness that must be compensated by increased survival from predation for the pheromone to confer a selective advantage to the species.

[1]  Christine Woodcock,et al.  Improved preparation of (E)-β-farnesene and its activity with economically important aphids , 1982, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[2]  Liu Shusheng.  Methods for Evaluation of Predators and Parasitoids in the Control of Insect Pests and Strategy for Their Practical Application , 2004 .

[3]  B. Roitberg,et al.  Age-dependent fitness costs of alarm signaling in aphids , 2003 .

[4]  Kongming Wu,et al.  Influences of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner Cotton Planting on Population Dynamics of the Cotton Aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover, in Northern China , 2003 .

[5]  B. Roitberg,et al.  Pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, cornicle ontogeny as an adaptation to differential predation risk , 2002 .

[6]  J. Vandenberg,et al.  Responses of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) to aphid alarm pheromone , 1999 .

[7]  R. Denno,et al.  The escape response of pea aphids to foliar‐foraging predators: factors affecting dropping behaviour , 1998 .

[8]  J. Borden,et al.  UTILIZATION OF WESTERN FLOWER THRIPS ALARM PHEROMONE AS A PREY-FINDING KAIROMONE BY PREDATORS , 1993, The Canadian Entomologist.

[9]  D. Kerns,et al.  Insecticide Resistance in Field Populations of the Cotton Aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) , 1992 .

[10]  Zhi-qiang Zhang.  The natural enemies of Aphis gossypii Glover (Hom., Aphididae) in China , 1992 .

[11]  Christine Woodcock,et al.  The Chemical Ecology of Aphids , 1992 .

[12]  Z. Zhang.  SYNTHESIS OF THE APHID ALARM PHEROMONE AND ANALOGUES:AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE SETTLING BEHAVIOUR OF MYZUS PERSICAE , 1989 .

[13]  B. D. Frazer,et al.  PREDATOR REPRODUCTION AND THE OVERALL PREDATOR-PREY RELATIONSHIP , 1981, The Canadian Entomologist.

[14]  J. Pickett,et al.  A potential application of aphid alarm pheromones , 1980 .

[15]  L. J. Edwards,et al.  Aphid Alarm Pheromones: Secretion and Reception , 1973 .

[16]  M. Dahl.  Über einen Schreckstoff bei Aphiden , 1971 .