Scale Sensitivity of Textural Features

Prevailing surface material recognition methods are based on textural features but most of these features are very sensitive to scale variations and the recognition accuracy significantly declines with scale incompatibility between visual material measurements used for learning and unknown materials to be recognized. This effect of mutual incompatibility between training and testing visual material measurements scale on the recognition accuracy is investigated for leading textural features and verified on a wood database, which contains veneers from sixty-six varied European and exotic wood species. The results show that the presented textural features, which are illumination invariants extracted from a generative multispectral Markovian texture representation, outperform the most common alternatives, such as Local Binary Patterns, Gabor features, or histogram-based approaches.

[1]  Simone Santini,et al.  Similarity Measures , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Markus A. Stricker,et al.  Similarity of color images , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Texture Features for Browsing and Retrieval of Image Data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Amit Jain,et al.  A multiscale representation including opponent color features for texture recognition , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Analysis of multichannel narrow-band filters for image texture segmentation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Michal Haindl,et al.  Image retrieval measures based on illumination invariant textural MRF features , 2007, CIVR '07.

[7]  Michal Haindl,et al.  Natural Material Recognition with Illumination Invariant Textural Features , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Jirí Filip,et al.  Visual Texture , 2013, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Michal Haindl,et al.  Visual Data Recognition and Modeling Based on Local Markovian Models , 2012, Mathematical Methods for Signal and Image Analysis and Representation.

[11]  Trygve Randen,et al.  Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..