The structural context of recent transitions to democracy

.  In general, the literature on democratic transitions has focused on political processes and choices of actors in explaining regime change, thereby failing to investigate whether structural factors affect the recent rise in transitions to democracy. An analysis of the influence of these structural factors is however important, and it has not yet been done in a systematic way in order to explain recent transitions to democracy since 1989. It will be shown that some structural factors indeed play a role in generating transitions to democracy. These results contradict the idea that structural factors can be ignored when explaining recent transitions to democracy. An additional finding in this article is that some structural factors, such as economic development, growth and a country's role in the world-system had an unexpected impact on democratic transitions since the end of the Cold War. These findings set bounds to the strength of the modernization and world-system theories to explain transitions to democracy, but on the other hand, democratic diffusion played a significant role after 1989. In the (structural) context in which a state had a peripheral role, a low level of economic growth and a high proportion of democratic neighbors, the probability of a state's transition to democracy was high. This structural context seemed to be fertile soil for recent transitions to democracy.

[1]  D. Shin.  On the Third Wave of Democratization: A Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research , 1994, World Politics.

[2]  P. Cutright,et al.  National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis , 1963 .

[3]  T. Karl.  Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America , 1990 .

[4]  R. Inglehart.  Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies , 1997 .

[5]  Harvey Starr,et al.  Democratic Dominoes , 1991 .

[6]  Ted Robert Gurr,et al.  Transitions to Democracy: Tracking Democracy''s Third Wave with the Polity III Data , 1996 .

[7]  R. Jackman.  On the Relation of Economic Development to Democratic Performance , 1973 .

[8]  Charles F. Cnudde,et al.  Toward a Communications Theory of Democratic Political Development: A Causal Model , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[9]  T. Power,et al.  The Structural Determinants of Democratic Consolidation , 1998 .

[10]  Will H. Moore,et al.  The Transformation of the Western State: The Growth of Democracy, Autocracy, and State Power Since 1800 , 1990 .

[11]  Herbert P. Kitschelt.  Political Regime Change: Structure and Process-Driven Explanations? , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[12]  M. Gasiorowski.  Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[13]  José Antonio Cheibub,et al.  Classifying political regimes , 1996 .

[14]  Michael D. Ward,et al.  The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946–1994 , 1998 .

[15]  A. Przeworski,et al.  Modernization: Theories and Facts , 1997, World Politics.

[16]  C. Chase-Dunn.  The Effects of International Economic Dependence on Development and Inequality: A Cross-National Study , 1975 .

[17]  Stephan Haggard,et al.  The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions , 1995 .

[18]  Larry Diamond,et al.  Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered , 1992 .

[19]  R. Vanrossem,et al.  The world system paradigm as general theory of development : A cross-national test , 1996 .

[20]  E. O. Wright.  Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis , 1996 .

[21]  萨托利,et al.  民主新论 = The theory of democracy revisited , 1987 .

[22]  Barrington. Moore.  Social origins of dictatorship and democracy , 1966 .

[23]  G. O'donnell,et al.  Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. , 1993 .

[24]  R. Gastil,et al.  The Comparative Survey of Freedom: Experiences and Suggestions , 1990 .

[25]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps , 1990 .

[26]  R. Barro.  Determinants of Democracy , 1999 .

[27]  D. Rustow.  Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model , 1970 .

[28]  Michael E. Alvarez,et al.  Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990 , 2000 .

[29]  M. Olsen.  Multivariate Analysis of National Political Development , 1968 .

[30]  T. Vanhanen,et al.  Prospects of Democracy: A study of 172 countries , 1984 .

[31]  E. Kick,et al.  Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955-1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  A. Przeworski,et al.  Democracy and Development: List of Tables and Figures , 2000 .

[33]  Ted Robert Gurr,et al.  Persistence and Change in Political Systems, 1800–1971 , 1974 .

[34]  S. Lipset.  The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited , 1995 .

[35]  S. Lipset.  The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited: 1993 Presidential Address , 1994 .

[36]  G. Palma.  To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions , 1990 .

[37]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy , 1980 .

[38]  K. Bollen,et al.  POLITICAL DEMOCRACY AND THE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME , 1985 .

[39]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  World System Position, Dependency, and Democracy: The Cross-National Evidence , 1983 .

[40]  Erik Olin Wright,et al.  Working-Class Power , Capitalist-Class Interests , and Class Compromise 1 , 2000 .

[41]  Income Inequality and Democratization: Reply to Bollen and Jackman , 1995 .

[42]  E. Muller.  Democracy, Economic Development, and Income Inequality , 1988 .

[43]  S. Lipset.  Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy , 1959, American Political Science Review.

[44]  Mitchell A. Seligson,et al.  Civic Culture and Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[45]  S. Huntington.  The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century , 1991 .

[46]  Michael S. Lewis-Beck,et al.  Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[47]  R. Dahl.  Polyarchy; participation and opposition , 1971 .

[48]  K. Bollen.  Political Democracy and the Timing of Development , 1979 .

[49]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  DEMOCRACY, STABILITY, AND DICHOTOMIES* , 1989 .

[50]  Karen L. Remmer.  The Sustainability of Political Democracy , 1996 .

[51]  Ronald Inglehart,et al.  The Renaissance of Political Culture , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[52]  D. Neubauer.  Some Conditions of Democracy , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[53]  R. Doorenspleet.  Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratization , 2000, World Politics.

[54]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Income inequality and democratization revisited : comment on Muller , 1995 .

[55]  Terence H. Qualter,et al.  Democracy and the Market , 1991 .

[56]  E. Muller,et al.  ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF DEMOCRACY , 1995 .

[57]  David Collier,et al.  DEMOCRACY AND DICHOTOMIES: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts , 1999 .

[58]  Kristian Skrede Gleditsch,et al.  All International Politics is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization , 2002 .