Single-Trial ERP Component Analysis Using a Spatiotemporal LCMV Beamformer

Goal: For statistical analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs), there are convincing arguments against averaging across stimuli or subjects. Multivariate filters can be used to isolate an ERP component of interest without the averaging procedure. However, we would like to have certainty that the output of the filter accurately represents the component. Methods: We extended the linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamformer, which is traditionally used as a spatial filter for source localization, to be a flexible spatiotemporal filter for estimating the amplitude of ERP components in sensor space. In a comparison study on both simulated and real data, we demonstrated the strengths and weaknesses of the beamformer as well as a range of supervised learning approaches. Results: In the context of measuring the amplitude of a specific ERP component on a single-trial basis, we found that the spatiotemporal LCMV beamformer is a filter that accurately captures the component of interest, even in the presence of both structured noise (e.g., other overlapping ERP components) and unstructured noise (e.g., ongoing brain activity and sensor noise). Conclusion: The spatiotemporal LCMV beamformer method provides an accurate and intuitive way to conduct analysis of a known ERP component, without averaging across trials or subjects. Significance: Eliminating averaging allows us to test more detailed hypotheses and apply more powerful statistical models. For example, it allows the usage of multilevel regression models that can incorporate between subject/stimulus variation as random effects, test multiple effects simultaneously, and control confounding effects by partial regression.

[1]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[3]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[4]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  E Donchin,et al.  Discriminant analysis in average evoked response studies: the study of single trial data. , 1969, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Walker.  Electroencephalography, Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields , 1982 .

[7]  A. Cutler.  Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[8]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Practice Effects in Large-Scale Visual Word Recognition Studies: A Lexical Decision Study on 14,000 Dutch Mono- and Disyllabic Words and Nonwords , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[9]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Predicting semantic priming at the item level , 2008 .

[10]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[11]  M. Bajo.  Semantic facilitation with pictures and words. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension , 2010, Brain and Language.

[13]  W. Fias,et al.  Response-Related Potentials during Semantic Priming: The Effect of a Speeded Button Response Task on ERPs , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Single-trial detection in EEG and MEG: Keeping it linear , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[15]  M. Kutas.  In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects , 1993 .

[16]  Théodore Papadopoulo,et al.  Forward Field Computation with OpenMEEG , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[17]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  xDAWN Algorithm to Enhance Evoked Potentials: Application to Brain–Computer Interface , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  C. Petten.  Examining the N400 semantic context effect item-by-item: relationship to corpus-based measures of word co-occurrence. , 2014 .

[19]  Govinda R. Poudel,et al.  Comparison of beamformers for EEG source signal reconstruction , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[20]  Megan A. Boudewyn,et al.  Cognitive control influences the use of meaning relations during spoken sentence comprehension , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Matthijs Verhage,et al.  A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Barry,et al.  Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review , 2000, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Beamforming in Noninvasive Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[26]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Single-Trial Analyses: Why Bother? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[27]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[28]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[30]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Methods for the quantification and statistical testing of ERP differences across conditions , 1998 .

[31]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[32]  Alexandre Gramfort,et al.  Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals , 2015, NeuroImage.

[33]  B.D. Van Veen,et al.  Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering , 1988, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[34]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Event-related potentials : a methods handbook , 2005 .

[35]  F. E. Satterthwaite.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946, Biometrics.

[36]  R. Allan Reese,et al.  Linear Mixed Models: a Practical Guide using Statistical Software , 2008 .

[37]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading , 2006, Brain Research.

[38]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Handbook of Blind Source Separation: Independent Component Analysis and Applications , 2010 .

[39]  M. Kutas,et al.  The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  K. Strimmer,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics , 2011 .

[41]  H. Hermens,et al.  More potential in statistical analyses of event‐related potentials: a mixed regression approach , 2011, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[42]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[43]  Gert Storms,et al.  Word associations: Network and semantic properties , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[44]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Shrinkage Algorithms for MMSE Covariance Estimation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[45]  Julian J. Faraway,et al.  Extending the Linear Model with R , 2004 .

[46]  E Emmanu.  SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles , 2010 .

[47]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[49]  Satterthwaite Fe.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[50]  E. Donchin.  Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review , 1978 .