Design and Evaluation of Global Freight Transportation Solutions (Corridors). Analysis of a Real World Case Study

Abstract The paper presents the design and evaluation of the global freight transportation solutions (corridors) between China and Europe (Poland in particular). The authors of this paper develop a universal, generic methodology of designing and evaluating the global transportation corridors. They claim that this problem has a multiple criteria character, and thus produce the proposed approach based on the principles of the methodology of Multiple Criteria Decision Making/ Aiding. The developed paradigm allows for intuitive, heuristic construction of alternative global transportation corridors and their multi-aspect, multi-dimensional evaluation. In the proposed approach the designed transportation solutions can be assessed from different perspectives, including: economic, technical, social, environmental and other aspects. The final output of the analysis is the ranking of the designed transportation corridors resulting in the selection of the most desired solution. The proposed methodology has been tested on a real world case study of a Polish company operating in the clothing industry and being one of the leading business entities in retail clothing market in Central and Eastern Europe.

[1]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[2]  Jacek Żak Design and Evaluation of Transportation Systems , 2017 .

[3]  P. L'os Mobility indicators and accessibility of transport , 2007 .

[4]  Anna Dolinayova,et al.  Evaluation Quality the Freight Transport through Application of Methods Multi-criteria Decision , 2015 .

[5]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  TRANSPORT PLANNING WITH MULTIPLE CRITERIA: THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS APPLICATIONS AND PROGRESS REVIEW , 1995 .

[6]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[7]  Jacek Żak,et al.  Multiple criteria evaluation of suppliers in different industries - comparative analysis of three case studies , 2016 .

[8]  Teodor Gabriel Crainic,et al.  Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Reviewing the Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Evaluation of Transport Projects: Time for a Multi-Actor Approach , 2015 .

[10]  Adel Guitouni,et al.  Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Jacek Zak,et al.  The Methodology of Multiple Criteria Decision Making/Aiding in Public Transportation , 2011 .

[12]  David A. Plane URBAN TRANSPORTATION: POLICY ALTERNATIVES , 1986 .

[13]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2016 .

[14]  Youngin Seo,et al.  Multimodal Transportation: The Case of Laptop from Chongqing in China to Rotterdam in Europe☆ , 2017 .

[15]  Barbara Galińska,et al.  Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Global Transportation Systems - Analysis of Case Study , 2017 .

[16]  B. Roy Decision-aid and decision-making , 1990 .

[17]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[18]  Adam Redmer,et al.  Multiple objective optimization of the fleet sizing problem for road freight transportation , 2008 .

[19]  Enoch Durbin Encyclopedia of transportation , 2000 .

[20]  Jacek Żak,et al.  The Methodology of Multiple Criteria Decision Making/Aiding as a System-Oriented Analysis for Transportation and Logistics , 2016, ICONS 2016.

[21]  Thomas Müller-Bohn,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2015 .

[22]  Wpm Wim Nuijten,et al.  Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..