Human cortical response to various apparent motions: A magnetoencephalographic study

The human visual system is considered to have at least two different mechanisms for perceiving motions: one for luminance-based (first-order) motions and another for non-luminance-based (second-order) motions. In this study, we examined the perception of first- and second-order motions using four different types of stimulus cues (luminance, contrast, texture, and flicker) while using whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure human brain responses to those apparent motions. MEG responses to all stimuli were recorded from the occipito-temporal area (possibly human MT/V5+), and response properties (peak latency and amplitude) varied with stimulus cues. Further, we observed various effects of luminance-addition to the non-luminance cues on the response properties that could not be explained by the magnetic field distribution and/or the visibility of the stationary object. The results indicate that differences in response properties elicited by various stimulus cues represent differences in the neural processes underlying apparent motions with various cues. We suggest that the distinct "preprocessing" of each stimulus cue occurs before the common process for apparent motion, and the response property changes associated with different cues are related to differences in preprocessing that may occur in a distributed cortical network that include the striate and extrastriate visual cortex.

[1]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Z L Lu,et al.  Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  S. Anstis,et al.  Effects of Luminance and Contrast on Direction of Ambiguous Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.

[5]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Interactions between first- and second-order motion revealed by optokinetic nystagmus , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Spatiotemporal activity of a cortical network for processing visual motion revealed by MEG and fMRI. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[8]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Cortical specialization for processing first- and second-order motion. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Aijaz A. Baloch,et al.  Neural model of first-order and second-order motion perception and magnocellular dynamics. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Emad N Eskandar,et al.  Parietal activity and the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Nishida Spatiotemporal properties of motion perception for random-check contrast modulations , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Random dots blinking: a new approach to elucidate the activities of the extrastriate cortex in humans , 1998, Neuroreport.

[13]  Matti S. Hämäläinen,et al.  Functional localization based on measurements with a whole-head magnetometer system , 2005, Brain Topography.

[14]  Chuan Yi Tang,et al.  A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail Problem , 1993, Inf. Process. Lett..

[15]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Magnetic response of human extrastriate cortex in the detection of coherent and incoherent motion , 2000, Neuroscience.

[16]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Neuroimaging of direction-selective mechanisms for second-order motion. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  A. Derrington,et al.  Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns? , 1985, Vision Research.

[19]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Position-based motion perception for color and texture stimuli: effects of contrast and speed , 1999, Vision Research.

[21]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Andrew M. Derrington,et al.  Errors in direction-of-motion discrimination with complex stimuli , 1987, Vision Research.

[23]  Ryusuke Kakigi,et al.  Physiological evidence of interaction of first‐ and second‐order motion processes in the human visual system: A magnetoencephalographic study , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Ryusuke Kakigi,et al.  Temporal structure of the apparent motion perception: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2004, Neuroscience Research.

[25]  H R Wilson,et al.  A model for motion coherence and transparency , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[26]  Ryusuke Kakigi,et al.  Human visual processing as revealed by magnetoencephalography. , 2005, International review of neurobiology.

[27]  Y. Kaneoke Magnetoencephalography: In search of neural processes for visual motion information , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[28]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[30]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Role of the superior temporal region in human visual motion perception. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  J. Faubert,et al.  Visual Evoked Potentials and Reaction Time Measurements to Motion-reversal Luminance- and Texture-defined Stimuli , 2005, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[32]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  N E Scott-Samuel,et al.  First-order and second-order signals combine to improve perceptual accuracy. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[34]  A. Johnston,et al.  A unified account of three apparent motion illusions , 1995, Vision Research.

[35]  Ryusuke Kakigi,et al.  Perception of apparent motion is related to the neural activity in the human extrastriate cortex as measured by magnetoencephalography , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  Processing of first- and second-order motion signals by neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[37]  N Osaka,et al.  Inefficient visual search for second-order motion. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[38]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age , 1991 .

[39]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[40]  U. Ilg,et al.  Initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements to first-order and second-order motion stimuli , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Adriane E Seiffert,et al.  Functional MRI studies of human visual motion perception: texture, luminance, attention and after-effects. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Position displacement, not velocity, is the cue to motion detection of second-order stimuli , 1998, Vision Research.

[43]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Different populations of neurons contribute to the detection and discrimination of visual motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[44]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Interattribute apparent motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[45]  C L Baker,et al.  A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses. , 1993, Science.

[46]  Marcello G P Rosa,et al.  Physiological responses of New World monkey V1 neurons to stimuli defined by coherent motion. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  A. Hashizume,et al.  Development of magnetoencephalography-magnetic resonance imaging integration software--technical note. , 2002, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[48]  Lee A. Gilroy,et al.  A common mechanism for the perception of first-order and second-order apparent motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[49]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Visual detection of motion speed in humans: spatiotemporal analysis by fMRI and MEG , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[50]  J. Hennig,et al.  The Processing of First- and Second-Order Motion in Human Visual Cortex Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  J J Knierim,et al.  Neural responses to visual texture patterns in middle temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Y. Okada,et al.  Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[53]  Bart Krekelberg,et al.  Interactions between Speed and Contrast Tuning in the Middle Temporal Area: Implications for the Neural Code for Speed , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Ryusuke Kakigi,et al.  Human cortical responses to coherent and incoherent motion as measured by magnetoencephalography , 2002, Neuroscience Research.

[55]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[56]  T D Albright,et al.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. , 1992, Science.

[57]  G. Orban,et al.  Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  R Kakigi,et al.  Human visual motion areas determined individually by magnetoencephalography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[59]  W. Rosenblith Sensory communication : contributions to the Symposium on Principles of Sensory Communication, July 19-August 1, 1959, Endicott House, M.I.T. , 1964 .

[60]  T. L. Lewis,et al.  Longer VEP latencies and slower reaction times to the onset of second-order motion than to the onset of first-order motion , 2003, Vision Research.

[61]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[62]  H Suzuki,et al.  Human cortical area responding to stimuli in apparent motion , 1997, Neuroreport.

[63]  A. Hurlbert,et al.  Neuromagnetic correlates of visual motion coherence , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[64]  Koji Inui,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Neural Adaptation Effect in the Human Visual Ventral Stream , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.