Automatic Sleep Stage Detection: A Study on the Influence of Various PSG Input Signals

Automatic sleep stage detection can be performed using a variety of input signals from a polysomnographic (PSG) recording. In this study, we investigate the effect of different input signals on the performance of feature-based automatic sleep stage classification algorithms with both a Random Forest (RF) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) classifier. Combinations of the EEG (electroencephalographic) signal and ECG (electrocardiographic), EMG (electromyographic) and respiratory signals as input are investigated as input with respect to using single channel and multi-channel EEG as input. The Physionet "You Snooze, You Win" dataset is used for the study. The RF classifier consistently outperforms our MLP implementation in all cases and is positively affected by specific signal combinations. The overall classification performance using a single channel EEG is high (an accuracy, precision and recall of 86.91 %, 89.52%, 86.91% respectively) using RF. The results are comparable to the performance obtained using six EEG channels as input. Adding respiratory signals to the inputs processed by RF increases the N2 stage detection performance with 20%, while adding the EMG signal improves the accuracy of the REM stage detection with 5%. Our analysis shows that adding specific signals as input to RF improves the accuracy of specific sleep stages and increases the overall performance. Using a combination of EEG and respiratory signals we achieved an accuracy of 93% for the RF classifier.

[1]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Object Class Segmentation using Random Forests , 2008, BMVC.

[2]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[3]  Yike Guo,et al.  Automatic Sleep Stage Scoring with Single-Channel EEG Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[4]  Maarten De Vos,et al.  Detection of REM sleep behaviour disorder by automated polysomnography analysis , 2018, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Alessandro Puiatti,et al.  Automated sleep scoring: A review of the latest approaches. , 2019, Sleep medicine reviews.

[6]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Tom Dhaene,et al.  Systematic Comparison of Respiratory Signals for the Automated Detection of Sleep Apnea , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[8]  Poul Jennum,et al.  Early Automatic Detection of Parkinson's Disease Based on Sleep Recordings , 2014, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[9]  Qiao Li,et al.  You Snooze, You Win: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2018 , 2018, 2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[10]  T Penzel,et al.  A review of signals used in sleep analysis , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[11]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[12]  黄亚明 PhysioBank , 2009 .

[13]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[14]  Xi Long,et al.  Sleep stage classification with ECG and respiratory effort , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[15]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[16]  Bogdan Ionescu,et al.  Automatic Sleep Stage Detection using a Single Channel Frontal EEG , 2019, 2019 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB).