Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of a Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Frame

AbstractThis paper reports about a real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) of a nonductile reinforced concrete frame that had previously been tested on a shake table (ST) at the University of California, Berkeley. This three-story, three-bay frame is numerically modeled with flexibility-based/layered nonlinear elements and over 400 degrees of freedom (DOFs), while one of the nonductile base columns is physically tested in the laboratory. RTHS is enabled through a new code developed by the authors, and these simulation results are compared with those obtained from the ST test. The comparison between ST tests and RTHS is encouraging, though still not acceptable (within 10%). Details of the simulation are provided, and preliminary results indicate that RTHS may be indeed provide the natural path for a gradual substitution of physical (and expensive) testing by numerical simulation. This contribution offers a small step in that direction.

[1]  Yoon Bong Shin.  Dynamic response of ductile and non-ductile reinforced concrete columns , 2007 .

[2]  J. Moehle,et al.  Seismic Tests of Concrete Columns with Light Transverse Reinforcement , 2006 .

[3]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Shake-Table Tests of a Concrete Frame Sustaining Column Axial Failures , 2012 .

[4]  Pui-Shum B. Shing,et al.  Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests , 1991 .

[5]  R. V. Mises,et al.  On Saint Venant's principle , 1945 .

[6]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development, potential, and limitations of real–time online (pseudo–dynamic) testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  Nam-Sik Kim,et al.  Shaking table and pseudodynamic tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of base-isolated structures , 1999 .

[8]  Wassim M. Ghannoum.  Experimental and analytical dynamic collapse study of a reinforced concrete frame with light transverse reinforcement , 2007 .

[9]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  A method for estimating specimen tangent stiffness for hybrid simulation , 2009 .

[10]  Tarek Elkhoraibi,et al.  Generalized hybrid simulation framework for structural systems subjected to seismic loading , 2007 .

[11]  Antony Darby,et al.  The development of real–time substructure testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Online energy-based error indicator for the assessment of numerical and experimental errors in a hybrid simulation , 2009 .

[13]  Georges Magonette.  Development and application of large–scale continuous pseudo–dynamic testing techniques , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Victor E. Saouma,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Loading Rate Effects in Reinforced Concrete Columns , 2012 .

[15]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics , 1977 .

[16]  Rogério Bairrão.  Shaking Table Testing , 2008 .

[17]  Pierre Léger,et al.  Comparison between real-time dynamic substructuring and shake table testing techniques for nonlinear seismic applications , 2010 .

[18]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems , 1999 .

[19]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Dynamic Shear and Axial-Load Failure of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 2008 .

[20]  Victor E. Saouma,et al.  A computational finite‐element program for hybrid simulation , 2012 .