Orthodontic-Surgical Treatment: Electromyographic and Electrognatographic Evaluation with Three Electromyographic Instruments

The introduction of electromyography in orthodontics determined the beginning of some studies about neuromuscolar system’s response to physiological and pathological oral alterations and the effect of masticatory muscles on facial morphology.1,2 Experimental studies demonstrated that a real change in muscolar function causes morphology alterations.1 Several studies in literature, from Watt e Williams, who studied in 1951 the effect of masticatory bolus on mouse maxillary and mandibular development, to Avis who in 1961 showed how muscolar function was important for gonial region development, connect morpholgy and function.3,4 In the last years masticatory muscles response to dento-skeletal discrepancies, alterations of breathing, swelling, speech and posture, to functional therapies, implant supported therapy and prosthetic rehabilitation has been studied.5 The definition of occlusion changed in time and it is now not based on mechanics theory but it includes functional aspects.6-10 In literature different positions about the compensatory muscolar aequilibrium in skeletal discrepancies can be found. A correct diagnosis is based not only on clinical and radiographic examination, but it is also important to analyze informations obtaining from neuromuscolar system.2 Knowing muscular action allows to obtain a correct diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning and helps in avoiding failures.2 Electromyography allows to evaluate neuromuscolar system and equilibrium, mandibular movements alterations and the effects of orthodontic therapy on stomathognatic system.7 Nowadays, different kind of electromyographic instruments are available, each of them constructed following specific protocols and with different aims. It is well known that facial growth is influenced by both genetic and extrinsic factors and that muscle function exercises an important influence both on growth and on craniofacial morphology.11 Orthodontic-surgical treatment was born in order to reposition the skeletal bone basis in a normal position in subjects where their position was not correct.

[1]  G. Farronato,et al.  Occlusal splint guides for presurgical orthodontic treatment. , 2008, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[2]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Soft tissue facial planes and masticatory muscle function in skeletal Class III patients before and after orthognathic surgery treatment. , 2008, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  The use of surface electromyography as a tool in differentiating temporomandibular disorders from neck disorders. , 2007, Manual therapy.

[4]  S. Baek,et al.  Skeletal sagittal and vertical facial types and electromyographic activity of the masticatory muscle. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  A. van der Bilt,et al.  The influence of mandibular advancement surgery on oral function in retrognathic patients: a 5-year follow-up study. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  G. Farronato,et al.  Aesthetic in ortodontic surgery , 2003 .

[7]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Relation between vertical facial morphology and jaw muscle activity in healthy young men. , 2003, Progress in orthodontics.

[8]  S. Shingaki,et al.  Changes in masticatory function after orthognathic treatment in patients with mandibular prognathism. , 2001, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  Morphologic and biomechanical correlates with maximum bite forces in orthognathic surgery patients. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  C. Sforza,et al.  The effects of a single intercuspal interference on electromyographic characteristics of human masticatory muscles during maximal voluntary teeth clenching. , 1999, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[11]  K. Tanne,et al.  Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology. , 1998, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  A G Glaros,et al.  Contributions of Facial Morphology, Age, and Gender to EMG Activity Under Biting and Resting Conditions: A Canonical Correlation Analysis , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[13]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  The effects of orthodontic treatment on isometric bite forces and mandibular motion in patients before orthognathic surgery. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[14]  W. Hnat,et al.  A study of bite force, part 2: Relationship to various cephalometric measurements. , 1995, The Angle orthodontist.

[15]  D. Precious,et al.  Pterygoid plate fracture in Le Fort I osteotomy with and without pterygoid chisel: a computed tomography scan evaluation of 58 patients. , 1993, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  A preliminary study of maximum voluntary bite force and jaw muscle efficiency in pre-orthognathic surgery patients. , 1992, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  G. Farronato,et al.  PROBLEMATICHE ORTOGNATODONTICHE FUNZIONALI ED OPEN-BITE DENTARIO : CONTRIBUTO ELETTROMIOGRAFICO (EMG) ED ELETTROGNATOGRAFICO (EEG) , 1992 .

[18]  H. Kayukawa Malocclusion and masticatory muscle activity: a comparison of four types of malocclusion. , 1992, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[19]  D. Brown,et al.  The pain experience and psychological adjustment to orthodontic treatment of preadolescents, adolescents, and adults. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Alterations of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal depth and their relationship after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  M. Bakke,et al.  Temporalis and masseter muscle activity in patients with anterior open bite and craniomandibular disorders. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[22]  K. Takada,et al.  [A cephalometric, electromyographic and kinesiographic appraisal of a patient with mandibular prognathism and anterior openbite malocclusion before and after surgical orthodontic therapy: a case report]. , 1990, [Osaka Daigaku shigaku zasshi] The journal of Osaka University Dental Society.

[23]  T. Turvey,et al.  The effect of orthognathic surgery on occlusal force. , 1989, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[24]  R. Oliver,et al.  Attitudes to Orthodontic Treatment , 1985, British journal of orthodontics.

[25]  B. Sonesson,et al.  An electromyographic analysis of the temporalis function of normal occlusion. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[26]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  Biomechanical considerations in the surgical correction of mandibular deficiency. , 1980, Journal of oral surgery.

[27]  V Sassouni,et al.  [Classification of skeletal facial types]. , 1969, Rivista italiana di stomatologia.

[28]  B. Ingervall Facial morphology and activity of temporal and lip muscles during swallowing and chewing. , 1976, The Angle orthodontist.

[29]  B. Jankelson,et al.  Kinesiometric instrumentation: a new technology. , 1975, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[30]  B Ingervall,et al.  Relation between facial morphology and activity of the masticatory muscles. , 1974, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[31]  J. Ahlgren,et al.  Muscle activity in normal and postnormal occlusion. , 1973, American journal of orthodontics.

[32]  J. de Boever,et al.  Physiological aspects of masticatory muscle stimulation: the myomonitor. , 1972, Quintessence international.

[33]  V. Avis The significance of the angle of the mandible: an experimental and comparative study. , 1961, American journal of physical anthropology.

[34]  D. G. Watt,et al.  The effects of the physical consistency of food on the growth and development of the mandible and the maxilla of the rat. , 1951, American journal of orthodontics.