All-planar SQUIDs and pickup coils for combined MEG and MRI

Flux trapping and random flux movement are common problems in superconducting thin-film devices. Ultrasensitive magnetic field sensors based on superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) coupled to large pickup coils are especially vulnerable to strong external fields. The issue has become particularly relevant with the introduction of SQUID-based ultra-low-field (ULF) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. In this paper, we study the constraints of thin-film-based magnetometers and gradiometers as exposed to magnetic field sequences of ULF MRI. In particular, we address issues such as response recovery, transient noise, magnetization and behaviour under shielded room conditions after prepolarization. As a result, we demonstrate sensors that are suitable for a combined multi-channel magnetoencephalography (MEG) and MRI imaging system.

[1]  Y.. Polyakov,et al.  Flux Trapping in Superconducting Circuits , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[2]  A. N. Matlashov,et al.  SQUID-based instrumentation for ultralow-field MRI , 2007 .

[3]  Mark B. Ketchen,et al.  Magnetic imaging of moat‐guarded superconducting electronic circuits , 1995 .

[4]  Dietmar Drung,et al.  THEORY FOR THE MULTILOOP DC SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTUM INTERFERENCE DEVICE MAGNETOMETER AND EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION , 1995 .

[5]  Clem,et al.  Magnetic hysteresis from the geometrical barrier in type-II superconducting strips. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[6]  J. Livingston,et al.  Surface Barrier in Type-II Superconductors , 1964 .

[7]  T. Doyle,et al.  Quasi-static magnetic behaviour of a disc-shaped type II superconductor , 1997 .

[8]  M. Ylilammi,et al.  Fabrication Process for RSFQ/Qubit Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[9]  T. H. Johansen,et al.  Colloquium: Experiments in vortex avalanches , 2004 .

[10]  Critical fields for vortex expulsion from narrow superconducting strips , 2007, cond-mat/0703735.

[11]  Ernst Helmut Brandt,et al.  Superconducting Thin Rings with Finite Penetration Depth , 2003, cond-mat/0312497.

[12]  J. Martinis,et al.  A series array of DC SQUIDs , 1991 .

[13]  Gheorghe Stan,et al.  Critical field for complete vortex expulsion from narrow superconducting strips. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[14]  Vittorio Foglietti,et al.  Flux dam, a method to reduce extra low frequency noise when a superconducting magnetometer is exposed to a magnetic field , 1995 .

[15]  H. Seppa,et al.  A coupled DC SQUID with low 1/f noise , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[16]  Robert H Kraus,et al.  Microtesla MRI of the human brain combined with MEG. , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[17]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[18]  J. Ekin,et al.  Experimental techniques for low-temperature measurements , 2006 .

[19]  Larkin,et al.  Geometrical barriers in high-temperature superconductors. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[20]  R. Huebener,et al.  Gibbs free-energy barrier against irreversible magnetic flux entry into a superconductor , 1973 .

[21]  Robert McDermott,et al.  Microtesla MRI with a superconducting quantum interference device. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Leif Grönberg,et al.  Progress Towards Large Locally Linearized SQUID Arrays , 2009 .

[23]  J. Simola,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Distortion of Magnetic Fields Applied Inside a Magnetically Shielded Room , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[24]  A. Kuznetsov,et al.  Onset of flux penetration into a type-II superconductor disk , 1997 .

[25]  J. E. Zimmerman,et al.  Sensitivity Enhancement of Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices through the Use of Fractional‐Turn Loops , 1971 .