Autonomous Emergency Braking for Vulnerable Road Users

A simple, but realistic, model of an autonomous emergency brake (AEB) system was studied. Using Matlab, the model was applied to 543 car‐to‐pedestrian and 607 car‐to‐bicyclist real‐world collisions gathered from the highly detailed German In‐Depth Accident Study Pre‐Crash Matrix (GIDAS PCM) and weighted for representativeness. All collisions were to the front of the car. The aim was to investigate how AEB performance was influenced by varying some of the most relevant system parameters. A reference system was predicted to provide very high effectiveness in saving lives and mitigating severe injuries. However, the effectiveness was substantially impaired by imposing restrictions on functionality in darkness and high speeds. Further, effectiveness was highly sensitive to timing of brake activation and deceleration provided by the AEB system. Combining all these restrictions (darkness, high speed, timing and deceleration) led to a tenfold decrease of effectiveness compared to the reference system.

[1]  Christian Erbsmehl,et al.  Simulation of Real Crashes as a Method for Estimating the Potential Benefits of Advanced SafetyTechnologies , 2009 .

[2]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Integrated pedestrian countermeasures: potential of head injury reduction combining passive and active countermeasures , 2012 .

[3]  Anders Kullgren.  Dose-response models and edr data for assessment of injury risk and effectiveness of safety systems , 2008 .

[4]  H Hautzinger.  Statistical and methodological foundations of the GIDAS accident survey system , 2007 .

[5]  Mattias Bengtsson,et al.  Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake and Pedestrian Detection - a practical example of Automatic Emergency Braking , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Mattias Brännström.  Decision-Making in Automotive Collision Avoidance Systems , 2011 .

[7]  Christian Krettek,et al.  SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY OF A NEW IN-DEPTH INVESTIGATION STUDY IN GERMANY CALLED GIDAS , 2003 .

[8]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[9]  Ulrich Sander,et al.  Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Brian C Tefft,et al.  Impact speed and a pedestrian's risk of severe injury or death. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  E Rosen,et al.  Influence of impact speed estimation errors on pedestrian fatality risk curves , 2010 .

[12]  Kip Smith,et al.  Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  D C Richards,et al.  Relationship between speed and risk of fatal injury: pedestrians and car occupants , 2010 .