The experiments reported here were aimed at testing the degree of coupling of motor components during the act of prehension. Hand movements were recorded bidimensionnally by a Selspot system which monitored the displacement of IREDS placed at the thumb and index finger tips, at the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index and at the radial styloid. Targets were three-dimensional trnaslucent dowels placed concentrically at 30 cm from the subject. The dowels were 10° apart from each other. In blocked and control trials, one dowel was illuminated and served as a target for the movement. In the perturbed trials (20% of cases) one dowel was illuminated first and the light was unexpectedly shifted to another dowel at the onset of the subject's movements. Kinematic analysis of the movement revealed the following: 1. In blocked and control trials, the wrist moved with a single acceleration to the target dowel. Meanwhile, the finger grip (computed as the distance between thumb and index IREDS) increased up to a maximum size, located in time at about 60% of movement time and then decreased until contact with the dowel. 2. In perturbed trials the initial wrist acceration was aborted. A new acceleration started about 180 ms after the first, in order to reorient the hand to the new target. Similarly, the initial grip aperture also aborted and reincreased in synchrony with the second wrist acceleration. 3. Perturbations increased movement time by only 95 ms on average. The first peak in acceleration indicating abortion of the initial movement occured 100 ms after the movement onset, i.e., 30 ms earlier than in non perturbed trials. These data revealed very fast alterations in movements kinematics in response to perturbations at the visual input level, which preserved accuracy of the movements. In addition, they showed temporary coupling of the finger grip with acceleration of the wrist.
[1]
C. Hofsten,et al.
Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study.
,
1988,
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2]
P. Morasso.
Spatial control of arm movements
,
2004,
Experimental Brain Research.
[3]
C. Prablanc,et al.
Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement
,
1986,
Nature.
[4]
M. Jeannerod.
The timing of natural prehension movements.
,
1984,
Journal of motor behavior.
[5]
M. Jeannerod.
The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern
,
1986,
Behavioural Brain Research.
[6]
M. Goodale,et al.
Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb
,
2004,
Experimental Brain Research.
[7]
K. J. Cole,et al.
Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp.
,
1986,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[8]
M. Jeannerod.
Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects
,
1981
.