Efficient 2D Sensor Location Estimation using Targets of Opportunity

Due to their low cost and ease of deployment, the use of passive acoustic sensors for target tracking has seen increasing popularity. Such systems might consist of individual microphones or hydrophones that selfassemble into arrays [24], or, perhaps, sensors consisting of clusters of microphones or hydrophones, each producing measurements consisting of arrival angles and features/attributes for use in data association [19].1 The clusters of microphones or hydrophones form individual sensors, which can also be referred to as “nodes” in the system. This paper focusses on the latter scenario, localizing sensors with measurements taken with respect to a common, unknown coordinate axis. Determining which detection on one sensor corresponds to the same target on another sensor (measurement association) might be accomplished, for example, by utilizing acoustic patterns for classification, as has previously been done to aid acoustic tracking [19]. Target tracking is not considered here. The scenarios considered focus on angular noise levels up to 2± (root-mean squared error), which is the accuracy of the sensors in [19], though acoustic sensors can often have significantly worse angular accuracies. When considering the construction of land-based sensor networks, it cannot be assumed that satellitebased localization systems, such as GPS (USA) or GLONASS (Russia), will be available, and such signals cannot penetrate far underwater. However, many nonsatellite-based location estimation algorithms, which have been primarily designed for use in underwater and wireless networks may be used. A number of methods applied to sonar channels are described in [4]. These approaches typically utilize the communication characteristics between sensors and are divided into two categories: range-based and range-free. Range-based methods utilize range (distance) measurements. Range-free schemes do not utilize range information. Both techniques might take advantage of moving anchor nodes that broadcast their position [6, 9, 13, 22]. Our focus is on algorithms for node localization based on the angle-only observations of the nodes, though we do consider the case where range measurements are also available. Estimates based on angle-only measurements are particularly useful when the sensors have a limited broadcast range. Underwater, this might be the case when the sensor network is built using data MULEs (Mobile Ubiquitous LAN2 Extensions) [21]. A data MULE is a mobile device that approaches the sensors to collect data. In such a network, traditional methods of sensor localization, which rely on communication channels between sensors, are not applicable.

[1]  Kai Li,et al.  A directionality based location discovery scheme for wireless sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[2]  Hao Zhu,et al.  Self-organization of unattended wireless acoustic sensor networks for ground target tracking , 2009, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[3]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[4]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Feature-aided localization of ground vehicles using passive acoustic sensor arrays , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[5]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data. , 1987 .

[6]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Distributed online localization in sensor networks using a moving target , 2004, IPSN.

[7]  Waylon Brunette,et al.  Data MULEs: modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003..

[8]  Camillo Gentile,et al.  Sensor Location through Linear Programming with Arrival Angle Constraints , 2007, 2007 41st Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[9]  M. Gerla,et al.  AUV-Aided Localization for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2007, International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems and Applications (WASA 2007).

[10]  Hewijin Christine Jiau,et al.  Localization with mobile anchor points in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[11]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[12]  Duo Liu,et al.  Designing reduced beacon trajectory for sensor localization , 2007 .

[13]  T. Kirubarajan,et al.  Multisensor multitarget bias estimation for general asynchronous sensors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  K.J.R. Liu,et al.  Signal processing techniques in network-aided positioning: a survey of state-of-the-art positioning designs , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[15]  Winston Khoon Guan Seah,et al.  Localization in underwater sensor networks: survey and challenges , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[16]  Walter Gautschi,et al.  On the computation of modified Bessel function ratios , 1978 .

[17]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[18]  Randolph L. Moses,et al.  An auto-calibration method for Unattended Ground Sensors , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[19]  S. Pattem,et al.  Distributed online localization in sensor networks using a moving target , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[20]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Sensor registration in ECEF coordinates using the MLR algorithm , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[21]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Sensor bias estimation in the presence of data association uncertainty , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[22]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .