Ontogenetic shifts in habitat use by the endangered Roanoke logperch (Percina rex)

SUMMARY 1. Conservation of the federally endangered Roanoke logperch (Percina rex, Jordan and Evermann) necessitates protection of habitat that is critical for all age classes. We examined habitat use patterns of individual logperch to determine: (1) if age classes of logperch in the Nottoway and Roanoke Rivers exhibit habitat selectivity, (2) if age classes differ in habitat use, and (3) if ontogenetic patterns of habitat use differ between the Roanoke and Nottoway river populations. 2. In the summers of 2000 and 2001, we observed 17 young-of-year (YOY) logperch [ 8 cm TL) in the upper Roanoke River, and 40 subadult and 39 adult logperch in the Nottoway River, Virginia. 3. All size classes of Roanoke logperch demonstrated habitat selectivity and logperch used a wide range of habitats in the Roanoke and Nottoway rivers during ontogeny. Habitat use by logperch varied among age classes and between rivers. 4. In the Roanoke River, adult and subadult logperch primarily preferred run and riffle habitat, often over gravel substrate. Subadults were found in lower water velocities and slightly more embedded microhabitats than adults. YOY logperch were found in shallow, stagnant backwaters and secondary channels. In the Nottoway River, both adult and subadult logperch were found over sand and gravel in deep, low-velocity pools and runs. Subadults were observed in slightly more silted, lower velocity habitat than adults. Shifts in habitat use were more distinct between age classes in the Roanoke River than the Nottoway River. 5. Successful conservation of this species will involve sound understanding of spatial variation in habitat use over logperch life history and preservation of the ecological processes that preserve required habitat mosaics.

[1]  I. Schlosser.  Predation risk and habitat selection by two size classes of a stream cyprinid: experimental test of a hypothesis , 1988 .

[2]  D. Hankin,et al.  Basinwide Estimation of Habitat and Fish Populations in Streams , 1993 .

[3]  N. Burkhead,et al.  Freshwater Fishes of Virginia , 1994 .

[4]  Donald J. Hall,et al.  Ontogenetic Habitat Shifts in Bluegill: The Foraging Rate‐Predation Risk Trade‐off , 1988 .

[5]  Dominique Ponton,et al.  Spatio-temporal distribution of young fish in tributaries of natural and flow-regulated sections of a neotropical river in French Guiana , 1999 .

[6]  William S. Platts,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF SMALL STREAMS: SIGNIFICANCE AND FUNCTION , 1986 .

[7]  E. Tramer.  Catastrophic Mortality of Stream Fishes Trapped in Shrinking Pools , 1977 .

[8]  N. Burkhead,et al.  Effects of Suspended Sediment on the Reproductive Success of the Tricolor Shiner, a Crevice-Spawning Minnow , 2001 .

[9]  B. Jonsson,et al.  Spatial segregation by age and size in Arctic charr: a trade-off between feeding possibility and risk of predation , 1993 .

[10]  K. Fausch,et al.  DYNAMICS OF INTERMITTENT STREAM HABITAT REGULATE PERSISTENCE OF A THREATENED FISH AT MULTIPLE SCALES , 2000 .

[11]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  Threats to Imperiled Freshwater Fauna , 1997 .

[12]  James D. Williams,et al.  Extinctions of North American Fishes During the past Century , 1989 .

[13]  Mark B. Bain,et al.  LARVAL FISH DISTRIBUTION AND MICROHABITAT USE IN FREE-FLOWING AND REGULATED RIVERS , 1995 .

[14]  J. K. Leslie,et al.  Distribution and abundance of young fish in Chenal Ecarte and Chematogen Channel in the St. Clair River delta, Ontario , 1991, Hydrobiologia.

[15]  M. Power,et al.  Depth Distributions of Armored Catfish: Predator‐Induced Resource Avoidance? , 1984 .

[16]  Walter G. Duffy,et al.  Fidelity and Survival of Juvenile Coho Salmon in Response to a Flood , 2001 .

[17]  G. Hartman,et al.  Impacts of logging in Carnation Creek, a high-energy coastal stream in British Columbia, and their implication for restoring fish habitat , 1996 .

[18]  M. Moser,et al.  Size specific predation by herons and its effect on the sex-ratio of natural populations of the mosquito fish Gambusia affinis baird and girard , 2004, Oecologia.

[19]  Kevin S. Cummings,et al.  Conservation Status of Freshwater Mussels of the United States and Canada , 1993 .

[20]  E. Baras,et al.  Diel dynamics of habitat use by riverine young-of-the-year Barbus barbus and Chondrostoma nasus (Cyprinidae) , 1999 .

[21]  P. Angermeier.  Predation by rock bass on other stream fishes: experimental effects of depth and cover , 1992, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[22]  Effects of season and body‐size on the distribution and diet of the Iberian chub Leuciscus pyrenaicus in a lowland catchment , 1993 .

[23]  E. Werner,et al.  THE ONTOGENETIC NICHE AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN SIZE-STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 1984 .

[24]  P. Magnan,et al.  Ontogenetic changes in diel activity, food habits and spatial distribution of juvenile and adult creek chub, Semotilus atromaculatus , 1984, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[25]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Critical current speeds and microhabitats of the benthic fishes Percina roanoka and Etheostoma flabellare , 1985, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[26]  Hilary E. Berkman,et al.  Effect of siltation on stream fish communities , 1987, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[27]  L. Meng,et al.  Native and introduced larval fishes of Suisun marsh, California: The effects of freshwater flow , 2001 .

[28]  Typology of aquatic habitats in the great ouse, a small regulated lowland river , 1991 .

[29]  P. Angermeier,et al.  Factors influencing behavior and transferability of habitat models for a benthic stream fish , 1997 .

[30]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  ANALYSIS OF HABITAT‐SELECTION RULES USING ANINDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODEL , 2002 .

[31]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Spatial variation in demographic processes of lotic fishes: conceptual models, empirical evidence, and implications for conservation , 1995 .

[32]  T. Groshens.  An assessment of the transferability of habitat suitability criteria for smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu , 1993 .

[33]  P. Angermeier,et al.  Use of line transect methods to estimate abundance of benthic stream fishes , 1995 .

[34]  David Williams,et al.  Improved likelihood ratio tests for complete contingency tables , 1976 .

[35]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[36]  Don E. McAllister,et al.  Fishes of North America Endangered, Threatened, or of Special Concern: 1989 , 1979 .

[37]  R. Mahon,et al.  Local size related segregation of fishes in streams , 1985 .

[38]  F. Rahel,et al.  Generality of Microhabitat Suitability Models for Young Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus) across Sites and among Years in Wyoming Streams , 1992 .

[39]  I. Schlosser,et al.  The Role of Predation in Age‐ and Size‐Related Habitat Use by Stream Fishes , 1987 .

[40]  R. Mann,et al.  The critical water velocities of larval roach (Rutilus rutilus) and dace (Leuciscus leuciscus) and implications for river management , 1997 .

[41]  W. Wurtsbaugh,et al.  Ontogenetic Habitat Shifts of Juvenile Bear Lake Sculpin , 1999 .

[42]  G. Copp.  Importance of marinas and off‐channel water bodies as refuges for young fishes in a regulated lowland river , 1997 .

[43]  J. Bayer,et al.  Early Life History of the Northern Pikeminnow in the Lower Columbia River Basin , 2001 .

[44]  G. Pess,et al.  A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds , 2002 .

[45]  M. Freeman,et al.  Transferability of Habitat Suitability Criteria for Fishes in Warmwater Streams , 1997 .