A Framework for the Evaluation of Complete Weighted Network Topology in EEG Functional Connectivity

Background: Graph theory provides an analytical framework for brain functional connectivity. The complete weighted networks (CWNs) derived from functional connectivity analyses are fundamentally different to the sparse binary networks studied in other research areas. Nonetheless, CWNs are typically analysed using sparse network methodology. New Methods: We offer an alternative framework for brain networks designed specifically for CWN analysis, generalising widely used binary network models to CWN form and analysing at different densities using straightforward metrics related to the main topological features of brain networks: integration, regularity and modularity. Importantly, we introduce two novel techniques which complement and enhance this framework. Firstly, a new metric to measure the complexity of a network. Secondly, a new CWN null model for EEG functional connectivity. Results: Our complexity metric is demonstrated to be a specific classifier for real world network behaviour. Our null model offers an unprecedented ease and rigour of comparability for functional brain networks exactly because of its CWN formulation. Demonstrating these techniques in the context of EEG networks obtained from both zero-lag and phase-lag connectivity measures, we reveal that EEG phase-lag networks attain the maximal values of complexity achieved by our CWN null model. Comparison to existing methods: This framework extends existing methodology and is not directly comparable to other methods. Particularly, our null model is the first CWN null model. Complexity shows important differences to the three pre-existing topological features. Conclusions: These developments offer solid and flexible foundations for research in functional connectivity, but also, more generally, the implications extend to all graph analysis domains.

[1]  S. Boccaletti,et al.  Complex network theory and the brain , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Modular and Hierarchically Modular Organization of Brain Networks , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias , 2011, NeuroImage.

[4]  R. Solé,et al.  Information Theory of Complex Networks: On Evolution and Architectural Constraints , 2004 .

[5]  C. Stam,et al.  The correlation of metrics in complex networks with applications in functional brain networks , 2011 .

[6]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[7]  Reka Albert,et al.  Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks , 1999 .

[8]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[9]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  A Critical Point for Random Graphs with a Given Degree Sequence , 1995, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[10]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Discrete Signal Processing on Graphs , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  C J Stam,et al.  The trees and the forest: Characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[12]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[14]  B. W. van Dijk,et al.  Opportunities and methodological challenges in EEG and MEG resting state functional brain network research , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  E. Todeva Networks , 2007 .

[17]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[18]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks in Schizophrenia , 2010 .

[20]  Jonas Richiardi,et al.  Graph analysis of functional brain networks: practical issues in translational neuroscience , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[22]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[23]  Mario A. Parra,et al.  Comparison of network analysis approaches on EEG connectivity in beta during Visual Short-term Memory binding tasks , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[24]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[26]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  A comparative study of synchrony measures for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on EEG , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  Michael G. Neubauer,et al.  Sum of squares of degrees in a graph , 2008, 0808.2234.

[28]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[29]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[31]  T. Snijders The degree variance: An index of graph heterogeneity , 1981 .

[32]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[33]  O. Sporns Networks of the Brain , 2010 .

[34]  C. Stam,et al.  Alzheimer's disease: connecting findings from graph theoretical studies of brain networks , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.

[35]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[37]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[39]  O. Sporns Small-world connectivity, motif composition, and complexity of fractal neuronal connections. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[40]  Edwin van Dellen,et al.  The minimum spanning tree: An unbiased method for brain network analysis , 2015, NeuroImage.

[41]  C. Stam Modern network science of neurological disorders , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  O. Sporns,et al.  The economy of brain network organization , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  Paul Erdös,et al.  On random graphs, I , 1959 .