Vineyard water status assessment using on-the-go thermal imaging and machine learning

The high impact of irrigation in crop quality and yield in grapevine makes the development of plant water status monitoring systems an essential issue in the context of sustainable viticulture. This study presents an on-the-go approach for the estimation of vineyard water status using thermal imaging and machine learning. The experiments were conducted during seven different weeks from July to September in season 2016. A thermal camera was embedded on an all-terrain vehicle moving at 5 km/h to take on-the-go thermal images of the vineyard canopy at 1.2 m of distance and 1.0 m from the ground. The two sides of the canopy were measured for the development of side-specific and global models. Stem water potential was acquired and used as reference method. Additionally, reference temperatures Tdry and Twet were determined for the calculation of two thermal indices: the crop water stress index (CWSI) and the Jones index (Ig). Prediction models were built with and without considering the reference temperatures as input of the training algorithms. When using the reference temperatures, the best models casted determination coefficients R2 of 0.61 and 0.58 for cross validation and prediction (RMSE values of 0.190 MPa and 0.204 MPa), respectively. Nevertheless, when the reference temperatures were not considered in the training of the models, their performance statistics responded in the same way, returning R2 values up to 0.62 and 0.65 for cross validation and prediction (RMSE values of 0.190 MPa and 0.184 MPa), respectively. The outcomes provided by the machine learning algorithms support the use of thermal imaging for fast, reliable estimation of a vineyard water status, even suppressing the necessity of supervised acquisition of reference temperatures. The new developed on-the-go method can be very useful in the grape and wine industry for assessing and mapping vineyard water status.

[1]  B. Tisseyre,et al.  The potential of high spatial resolution information to define within-vineyard zones related to vine water status , 2008, Precision Agriculture.

[2]  Simone Giacosa,et al.  Investigating the use of gradient boosting machine, random forest and their ensemble to predict skin flavonoid content from berry physical-mechanical characteristics in wine grapes , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[3]  Manfred Stoll,et al.  Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[4]  Paul R. Lowe,et al.  The Computation of Saturation Vapor Pressure , 1974 .

[5]  Hans R. Schultz,et al.  Some critical issues in environmental physiology of grapevines: future challenges and current limitations , 2010 .

[6]  H. Jones,et al.  Exploring thermal imaging variables for the detection of stress responses in grapevine under different irrigation regimes. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[7]  Ilkka Leinonen,et al.  Thermal Imaging for the Study of Plant Water Relations , 2003 .

[8]  H. Damasio,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence: Special Issue on Perceptual Organization in Computer Vision , 1998 .

[9]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[10]  Olga M. Grant,et al.  Use of Thermal Imaging in Viticulture: Current Application and Future Prospects , 2010 .

[11]  M. Diago,et al.  In field quantification and discrimination of different vineyard water regimes by on-the-go NIR spectroscopy , 2018 .

[12]  Maria Manuela Chaves,et al.  Optimizing thermal imaging as a technique for detecting stomatal closure induced by drought stress under greenhouse conditions , 2006 .

[13]  J. Baluja,et al.  Assessment of vineyard water status variability by thermal and multispectral imagery using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) , 2012, Irrigation Science.

[14]  H. Jones,et al.  Plants and Microclimate. , 1985 .

[15]  José E. Fernández,et al.  Plant-based sensing to monitor water stress: Applicability to commercial orchards , 2014 .

[16]  S. Tyerman,et al.  Computational water stress indices obtained from thermal image analysis of grapevine canopies , 2012, Irrigation science.

[17]  H. Ojeda,et al.  Stomatal behavior of different grapevine cultivars in response to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit , 2010 .

[18]  M. Diago,et al.  Future opportunities of proximal near infrared spectroscopy approaches to determine the variability of vineyard water status , 2017 .

[19]  Jean Lévêque,et al.  Ecophysiological Modeling of Grapevine Water Stress in Burgundy Terroirs by a Machine-Learning Approach , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[20]  J. A. Taylor,et al.  A model for the spatial prediction of water status in vines (Vitis vinifera L.) using high resolution ancillary information , 2010, Precision Agriculture.

[21]  Matthew Bardeen,et al.  Selecting Canopy Zones and Thresholding Approaches to Assess Grapevine Water Status by Using Aerial and Ground-Based Thermal Imaging , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[22]  Márkus Keller The Science of Grapevines: Anatomy and Physiology , 2010 .

[23]  D. Cozzolino,et al.  Non-destructive measurement of grapevine water potential using near infrared spectroscopy , 2011 .

[24]  H. Jones Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[25]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Use of thermal and visible imagery for estimating crop water status of irrigated grapevine. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  Juan Fernández-Novales,et al.  Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network Models for the Classification of Grapevine Varieties Using a Portable NIR Spectrophotometer , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  M. Meron,et al.  Crop water status estimation using thermography: multi-year model development using ground-based thermal images , 2014, Precision Agriculture.

[28]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[29]  M. M. Chaves,et al.  Thermography to explore plant-environment interactions. , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[30]  P. F. Scholander,et al.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants , 1965, Science.

[31]  M. M. Chaves,et al.  Grapevine varieties exhibiting differences in stomatal response to water deficit. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[32]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Seasonal evolution of crop water stress index in grapevine varieties determined with high-resolution remote sensing thermal imagery , 2015, Irrigation Science.

[33]  Juan José Rodríguez Diez,et al.  Rotation Forest: A New Classifier Ensemble Method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[34]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Vineyard irrigation scheduling based on airborne thermal imagery and water potential thresholds , 2016 .

[35]  Javier Tardáguila,et al.  Thermal imaging to detect spatial and temporal variation in the water status of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) , 2016 .

[36]  H. Medrano,et al.  Validation of thermal indices for water status identification in grapevine , 2014 .

[37]  Klaus Hinkelmann,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments: Introduction to Experimental Design , 1994 .

[38]  Hamlyn G. Jones,et al.  Use of infrared thermometry for estimation of stomatal conductance as a possible aid to irrigation scheduling , 1999 .

[39]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Crop water stress mapping for site-specific irrigation by thermal imagery and artificial reference surfaces , 2010, Precision Agriculture.

[40]  V. Alchanatis,et al.  Mapping water status based on aerial thermal imagery: comparison of methodologies for upscaling from a single leaf to commercial fields , 2017, Precision Agriculture.

[41]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Mapping crop water stress index in a ‘Pinot-noir’ vineyard: comparing ground measurements with thermal remote sensing imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2014, Precision Agriculture.

[42]  María-Paz Diago,et al.  Data Mining and NIR Spectroscopy in Viticulture: Applications for Plant Phenotyping under Field Conditions , 2016, Sensors.

[43]  Antonio Odair Santos,et al.  Grapevine leaf water potential based upon near infrared spectroscopy , 2009 .

[44]  O. Mathieu,et al.  Electrical imaging of soil water availability to grapevine: a benchmark experiment of several machine-learning techniques , 2016, Precision Agriculture.

[45]  S. Idso,et al.  Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability☆ , 1981 .

[46]  Juan Fernández-Novales,et al.  Non-destructive assessment of grapevine water status in the field using a portable NIR spectrophotometer. , 2017, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[47]  B. Loveys,et al.  Grape vine varieties Shiraz and Grenache differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue , 2006 .

[48]  Petra Perner,et al.  Data Mining - Concepts and Techniques , 2002, Künstliche Intell..