Morphological effects on pronunciation

Converging, albeit inconsistent, empirical evidence suggests that the morphological structure of a word influences its pronunciation. We investigated this issue using Ultrasound Tongue Imaging in the context of an experimental cognitive psychology paradigm. Scottish speakers were trained on apparently homophonous monomorphemic and bimorphemic novel words (e.g. zord, zorred), and tested on speech production tasks. Monomorphemic items were realised acoustically with shorter durations than bimorphemic items; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Progressive coarticulatory effects were also observed in the monomorphemic condition for some speakers. A dynamic analysis of the articulatory data revealed that the observed differences in the pronunciations of the two types of items could be due to factors other than morphological structure. Our results, albeit inconclusive, make a significant contribution to the literature in this research domain insofar as the presence or absence of morphological effects on pronunciation has important implications for extant theories of speech production.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[2]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[3]  Beth L. Losiewicz.  The effect of frequency on linguistic morphology , 1992 .

[4]  J.B. Millar,et al.  The Australian National Database of Spoken Language , 1994, Proceedings of ICASSP '94. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[5]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Effects of Morpheme Boundaries on Intergestural Timing: Evidence from Korean , 2001, Phonetica.

[7]  Michael Lipka.  Word Formation , 2001, The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek.

[8]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[10]  B. Munson.  Lexical Access , Lexical Representation , and Vowel Production , 2006 .

[11]  B. Gick,et al.  Articulation without acoustics: A case study of Oneida utterance‐final forms , 2006 .

[12]  M. Aylett,et al.  Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Lisa Davidson.  Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M. Gaskell,et al.  Sleep-Associated Changes in the Mental Representation of Spoken Words , 2007, Psychological science.

[15]  A. Turk,et al.  Durational correlates of English sublexical constituent structure* , 2009, Phonology.

[16]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[17]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological effects on fine phonetic detail: The case of Dutch -igheid , 2010 .

[18]  Samantha F. McCormick,et al.  Orthography influences the perception and production of speech. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  James M Scobbie,et al.  A common co-ordinate system for mid-sagittal articulatory measurement , 2011 .

[20]  James M Scobbie,et al.  Very high frame rate ultrasound tongue imaging , 2011 .

[21]  Barbara Schuppler,et al.  How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t/: Studies at the phonemic and sub-phonemic level , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[22]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  The role of morphology in acoustic reduction , 2012 .

[23]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The effects of coarticulation and morphological complexity on the production of English coda clusters: Acoustic and articulatory evidence from 2-year-olds and adults using ultrasound , 2013, J. Phonetics.