Are serious video games something more than a game? A review on the effectiveness of serious games to facilitate intergenerational learning

Aging diversity in organizations creates potential challenges, particularly for knowledge management, skills update and skills obsolescence. Intergenerational learning (IGL) involves knowledge building, innovation and knowledge transfer between generations within an organization (Ropes 2011). Serious games refer to the use of computer games in raising awareness about educational topics, acquiring new knowledge and skills by enabling learners to engage and participate in situations that would otherwise be impossible to experience (Corti 2006). Although learning with the use of serious games is similar to traditional learning in several cognitive respects, there are noted differences in the learning style and structure of learning using serious games. The success of learning using serious games lies in the actual involvement of a participant playing the game, which in turn, creates increased cognitive links with real-life situations allowing the individual to make relevant associations, to use mnemonic strategies with the facilitation of multi-dimensional educational aids (e.g., visual, auditory). Some of the beneficial aspects of learning with the use of serious games include the elevation of several cognitive skills, which are directly or indirectly implicated in the learning process. Among them are attention and visuo-spatial abilities, memory and motor skills. However, several barriers have been noted that fall into two general categories: a) health issues (e.g., cognitive strain, headaches) and b) psychological issues (e.g., social isolation, emotional disturbances). Since the training conditions are learner-centered and highly determined by the individual, there is increased need for evaluating the learning outcomes using specific success indicators. Examples of games that are designed to facilitate IGL are scarce, while there are no examples of IGL games in most EU countries. The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the current literature of theories on learning through serious games in adults and the elderly with reference to the cognitive mechanisms implicated, benefits and barriers in learning using new technologies in different generations. Secondly, this paper reviews the existence of serious games designed to facilitate IGL in Europe, as well as the characteristics of serious games in raising awareness that could be used to facilitate IGL. In doing so, specific focus is placed on the development of success indicators that determine the effectiveness of serious games on raising awareness on IGL.

[1]  Minna Kulju,et al.  Developing a questionnaire for measuring mobile business service experience , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[2]  Daphne Bavelier,et al.  Stretching the limits of visual attention: the case of action video games. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[3]  N. Charness,et al.  Word-processing training and retraining: effects of adult age, experience, and interface. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[4]  Donald Ropes,et al.  Measuring the impact of communities of practice: a conceptual model , 2011 .

[5]  A. Kramer,et al.  Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[6]  G. Kimble,et al.  Hilgard and Marquis' Conditioning and learning , 1961 .

[7]  Jean Claude Marquié,et al.  Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[8]  John L. Arnott,et al.  Methods for human – computer interaction research with older people , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Thomas W. H. Ng,et al.  Organizational embeddedness and occupational embeddedness across career stages , 2007 .

[10]  Doug Mahar,et al.  The effects of computer anxiety, state anxiety, and computer experience on users' performance of computer based tasks , 1997 .

[11]  A F Kramer,et al.  Attentional flexibility and aging: you don't need to be 20 years of age to split the beam. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[12]  David W. Shaffer,et al.  Epistemic frames for epistemic games , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Lucia Pannese,et al.  Games and learning come together to maximise effectiveness: The challenge of bridging the gap , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Constructivist-Compatible Beliefs and Practices among U.S. Teachers. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey Report #4. , 2000 .

[15]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective , 1994 .

[16]  Kwang Kim,et al.  Participation in Adult Education and Lifelong Learning: 2000-01. National Household Education Surveys of 2001. NCES 2004-050. , 2004 .

[17]  Tarja Susi,et al.  Serious Games : An Overview , 2007 .

[18]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Affective Influences of Selective Attention , 2006 .

[19]  Valerie L. Worthington,et al.  Existential Computer Anxiety and Changes in Computer Technology: What Past Research on Computer Anxiety Has Missed , 1999 .

[20]  Jack Botwinick,et al.  Cognitive processes in maturity and old age , 1967 .

[21]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  Age-related differences in supervisory attentional system functions. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[22]  Martin Oliver,et al.  How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Strategies for teaching older people to use the World Wide Web , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[24]  David Guile,et al.  Pedagogy in Work-Based Contexts , 1999 .

[25]  Donald Ropes,et al.  Intergenerational learning in organizations , 2013 .

[26]  Peter Caputi,et al.  Comparison of older and younger adults' attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Carol Baily,et al.  Reverse intergenerational learning: a missed opportunity? , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[28]  M. Gianluca,et al.  The Potential of Digital Games for Empowerment and Social Inclusion of Groups at Risk of Social and Economic Exclusion: Evidence and Opportunity for Policy , 2013 .

[29]  Lucia Pannese,et al.  E-VITA, life simulations in an intergenerational setting , 2009 .

[30]  C. Grady The cognitive neuroscience of ageing , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[32]  Clark Aldrich,et al.  Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in e-Learning and Other Educational Experiences , 2005 .

[33]  S. Wilson What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy , 2006 .

[34]  Abraham Tesser,et al.  Attitudes and Behavior: the Cognitive-Affective Mismatch Hypothesis , 1990 .

[35]  Jurek Kirakowski,et al.  Measuring the Human Element in Complex Technologies , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[36]  T. Garavan,et al.  Competencies and workplace learning: some reflections on the rhetoric and the reality , 2001 .

[37]  R. L. Babcock,et al.  Computer anxiety in young and older adults: Implications for human-computer interactions in older populations , 1997 .

[38]  Gary M. Shulman,et al.  “What's in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivation , 1995 .

[39]  Melvin A. Mottram,et al.  Word-processing training and retraining: effects of adult age, experience, and interface. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[40]  J. Pratt,et al.  Object- and location-based inhibition of return in younger and older adults. , 2006, Psychology and aging.