A feedback-controlled interface for treadmill locomotion in virtual environments

Virtual environments (VEs) allow safe, repeatable, and controlled evaluations of obstacle avoidance and navigation performance of people with visual impairments using visual aids. Proper simulation of mobility in a VE requires an interface, which allows subjects to set their walking pace. Using conventional treadmills, the subject can change their walking speed by pushing the tread with their feet, while leveraging handrails or ropes (self-propelled mode). We developed a feedback-controlled locomotion interface that allows the VE workstation to control the speed of the treadmill, based on the position of the user. The position and speed information is also used to implement automated safety measures, so that the treadmill can be halted in case of erratic behavior. We compared the feedback-controlled to the self-propelled mode by using speed-matching tasks (follow a moving object or match the speed of an independently moving scene) to measure the efficacy of each mode in maintaining constant subject position, subject control of the treadmill, and subject pulse rates. In addition, we measured the perception of speed in the VE on each mode. The feedback-controlled mode required less physical exertion than self-propelled. The average position of subjects on the feedback-controlled treadmill was always within a centimeter of the desired position. There was a smaller standard deviation in subject position when using the self-propelled mode than when using the feedback-controlled mode, but the difference averaged less than 6 cm across all subjects walking at a constant speed. Although all subjects underestimated the speed of an independently moving scene at higher speeds, their estimates were more accurate when using the feedback-controlled treadmill than the self-propelled.

[1]  G. Carter,et al.  The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay , 1976 .

[2]  Murray Mp,et al.  Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. , 1985, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  H. J. Arnold.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[4]  Norman S. Nise,et al.  Control Systems Engineering , 1991 .

[5]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Presence and distal attribution: phenomenology, determinants, and assessment , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  Clinical research and statistical analysis of a visual field awareness system. , 1992, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[7]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  David Lindley,et al.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990, The Mathematical Gazette.

[9]  Maxwell J. Wells,et al.  The Virtual Motion Controller: A Sufficient-Motion Walking Simulator , 1996 .

[10]  W. Berger,et al.  Visual influence on human locomotion Modulation to changes in optic flow , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Rudy Darken,et al.  The omni-directional treadmill: a locomotion device for virtual worlds , 1997, UIST '97.

[12]  W. Berger,et al.  Visual influence on human locomotion , 1997 .

[13]  Hk Distler,et al.  The perception of absolute speed during self-motion , 1998 .

[14]  Adar Pelah,et al.  The influence of non-visual signals of walking on the perceived speed of optic flow , 1998 .

[15]  Bob G. Witmer,et al.  Judging Perceived and Traversed Distance in Virtual Environments , 1998, Presence.

[16]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Walking about virtual environments on an infinite floor , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[17]  Eli Peli,et al.  Augmented Vision for Central Scotoma and Peripheral Field Loss , 1999 .

[18]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control duringwalking , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Design Specifications for the Second Generation Sarcos Treadport Locomotion Interface , 2000, Dynamic Systems and Control: Volume 2.

[20]  J. Wann,et al.  Heading perception and the allocation of attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[21]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Locomotion Interface for Virtual Environments , 2000 .

[22]  L. Harris,et al.  Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self motion , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Li Li,et al.  Perception of heading during rotation: sufficiency of dense motion parallax and reference objects , 2000, Vision Research.

[24]  C. Striem,et al.  Vision Rehabilitation assessment, intervention and outcomes , 2000 .

[25]  E. Peli.  OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE Copyright © 2000 American Academy of Optometry ORIGINAL ARTICLE Field Expansion for Homonymous Hemianopia by Optically Induced Peripheral Exotropia , 2022 .

[26]  E. D. Haan,et al.  Vision Rehabilitation assessment, intervention and outcomes , 2000 .

[27]  P. Willemsen,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Perceived Egocentric Distance in Real , Image-Based , and Traditional Virtual Environments using Direct Walking Tasks , 2002 .

[28]  R. Wang,et al.  Walking, looking to the side, and taking curved paths , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[30]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. , 2003 .

[31]  A. Minetti,et al.  A feedback-controlled treadmill (treadmill-on-demand) and the spontaneous speed of walking and running in humans. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[32]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[33]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Robert B. Goldstein,et al.  Perceived Collision With an Obstacle in a Virtual Environment , 2003 .

[35]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[36]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Visual Guidance of Intercepting a Moving Target on Foot , 2004, Perception.

[37]  Paul A. Braren,et al.  How We Avoid Collisions With Stationary and Moving Obstacles , 2004 .

[38]  Jane M. Eisinger,et al.  Visual illusion in virtual world alters women’s target-directed walking , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  E. Peli,et al.  Making virtual reality “more real” and the perception of potential collisions , 2004 .

[40]  Eli Peli,et al.  Perception of collisions while walking in a virtual environment with simulated peripheral vision loss. , 2004 .

[41]  J. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Measurements of preferred walking speed in subjects with central and peripheral vision loss , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[42]  Eli Peli,et al.  Tracking the line of primary gaze in a walking simulator: Modeling and calibration , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[43]  William H Warren,et al.  Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Effects of effort and reduced visual cue information on percieved walking speed , 2005 .

[45]  W. Berger,et al.  Visual kinesthesia and locomotion in Parkinson's disease , 2005, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[46]  Andrew P. Duchon,et al.  Do Humans Integrate Routes Into a Cognitive Map? Map- Versus Landmark-Based Navigation of Novel Shortcuts , 2005 .

[47]  Laura F. Fox,et al.  Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: more than meets the eye. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Krista M. Gigone,et al.  Perception of visual speed while moving. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Thomas Banton,et al.  The Perception of Walking Speed in a Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[50]  Eli Peli,et al.  P-27: Maintaining Position and Display Perspective in a Walking Simulator while Self-Pacing on a Treadmill , 2006 .

[51]  Eli Peli,et al.  Heading assessment by “tunnel vision” patients and control subjects standing or walking in a virtual reality environment , 2007, TAP.