Bilateral Trade Agreements and the Interconnectedness of Global Trade

Over the last decades, bilateral trade agreements (BTAs) have increased considerably in number and economic relevance. Notably, such agreements substantially affect global trade, since the reorganization of flows of goods and services has prominent impacts on the contracting countries' economies, but also on other parties that are (directly or indirectly) engaged in trade with these countries. Here, we empirically study the effect of BTAs on the input-output linkages between the contractual parties' national economic sectors by defining a new measure of Trade Interconnectedness (TI), which describes the relative importance of direct and indirect production linkages between the two countries in the international trade network. By analyzing its time evolution for each pair of trade agreement partners, we demonstrate that while most BTAs are succeeded by an increase in TI between the contractors, there are some notable exceptions. In particular, comparing the trade profiles of China and the United States (US), we find indications that both countries have been pursuing fundamentally different objectives and strategies related to the negotiation of BTAs.

[1]  J. Bergstrand,et al.  Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade? , 2005 .

[2]  R. Donner,et al.  Distributions of positive correlations in sectoral value added growth in the global economic network* , 2017 .

[3]  Ernesto H. Stein,et al.  Regional Trading Arrangements: Natural or Supernatural? , 1996 .

[4]  V. Vicard Determinants of successful regional trade agreements , 2011 .

[5]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[6]  Enrico Ser-Giacomi,et al.  Introduction to Focus Issue: Complex network perspectives on flow systems. , 2017, Chaos.

[7]  Andrea Gabrielli,et al.  Randomizing bipartite networks: the case of the World Trade Web , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Vasco M. Carvalho,et al.  How production networks amplify economic growth , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Giorgio Fagiolo,et al.  World-trade web: topological properties, dynamics, and evolution. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Silvia Sopranzetti Overlapping Free Trade Agreements and International Trade: A Network Approach , 2018 .

[11]  D. Garlaschelli,et al.  Structure and evolution of the world trade network , 2005, physics/0502066.

[12]  Mian Dai,et al.  On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements , 2014 .

[13]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  BUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION , 2013 .

[14]  Kazuko Yamasaki,et al.  Ranking the Economic Importance of Countries and Industries , 2014, 1408.0443.

[15]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The network structure of economic output , 2011, 1101.1707.

[16]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Topology of the world trade web. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Luciano Pietronero,et al.  The Heterogeneous Dynamics of Economic Complexity , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Vasco M. Carvalho,et al.  The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations , 2011 .

[19]  M. Cipollina,et al.  Reciprocal Trade Agreements in Gravity Models: A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[20]  Leonie Wenz,et al.  Acclimate—a model for economic damage propagation. Part II: a dynamic formulation of the backward effects of disaster-induced production failures in the global supply network , 2014, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[21]  Leonie Wenz,et al.  Acclimate—a model for economic damage propagation. Part 1: basic formulation of damage transfer within a global supply network and damage conserving dynamics , 2014, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[22]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[23]  Steven Yamarik,et al.  Does trade creation measure up? A reexamination of the effects of regional trading arrangements , 2004 .

[24]  Leonie Wenz,et al.  Modeling Loss-Propagation in the Global Supply Network: The Dynamic Agent-Based Model Acclimate , 2017 .

[25]  Reik V. Donner,et al.  A Network of Networks Perspective on Global Trade , 2015, PloS one.

[26]  Manfred Elsig,et al.  The Design of Preferential Trade Agreements , 2011 .

[27]  P. Krugman Is Bilateralism Bad? , 1989 .

[28]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, 1990-2002 , 2011 .

[29]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  International Institutions and Domestic Politics: Can Preferential Trading Agreements Help Leaders Promote Economic Reform? , 2014 .

[30]  John Whalley,et al.  China's New Regional Trade Agreements , 2004 .

[31]  R. Feinberg The Political Economy of United States' Free Trade Arrangements , 2003 .

[32]  J. Whalley,et al.  Why Do Countries Seek Regional Trade Agreements? , 1996 .

[33]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Mapping the structure of the world economy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Giorgio Fagiolo,et al.  Null models of economic networks: the case of the world trade web , 2011, 1112.2895.

[35]  J. Oman The natural & the supernatural , 1931 .

[36]  Céline Carrère,et al.  Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model , 2006 .

[37]  A. Levermann,et al.  Enhanced economic connectivity to foster heat stress–related losses , 2016, Science Advances.

[38]  V. Muggeo Estimating regression models with unknown break‐points , 2003, Statistics in medicine.