Multi-objective functional analysis for product portfolio optimization

Product portfolio optimization requires that one identify a few designs that provide for the widest variety of functions while minimizing product variety. This requires one to identify groupings of products that meet different functional tradeoffs. Here we propose to use multi-objective optimization for estimating the non-dominated sets of designs, and mapping these to the design space reveals that the good designs are often restricted to a few patches on a low-dimensional manifold, thus resulting in significant dimensionality reductions for the design decision space. We model function in a design family in terms of a phenomenological description, leading to a set of performative behaviours at the functional level, which are determined using set of performance metrics specific to a given embodiment. The non-dominated designs are clustered in the design space in an unsupervised manner to obtain candidate product groupings which the designer may inspect to arrive at portfolio decisions.We demonstrate this process on two different designs (faucets and springs), involving both continuous and discrete design variables. The effect of numerical stability in the process is investigated empirically, and the conditions under which the results would scale to large dimensional spaces are also explored.

[1]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Standardization of Components, Products and Processes with Data Mining , 2004 .

[2]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Variation-Based Method for Product Family Design , 2002 .

[3]  S. N. Kramer,et al.  An Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Based Method for Mixed Integer Discrete Continuous Optimization and Its Applications to Mechanical Design , 1994 .

[4]  Mark Treleven,et al.  Component part standardization: An analysis of commonality sources and indices , 1986 .

[5]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  A heuristic genetic algorithm for product portfolio planning , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[6]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[7]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  'Neural-gas' network for vector quantization and its application to time-series prediction , 1993, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[8]  Antony R Mileham,et al.  Predicting the whole-life cost of a product at the conceptual design stage , 2008 .

[9]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .

[10]  Zhengdong Huang,et al.  Parametric Modeling of Part Family Machining Process Plans From Independently Generated Product Data Sets , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[11]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[12]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  AN EXTENSION OF THE COMMONALITY INDEX FOR PRODUCT FAMILY OPTIMIZATION , 2007, DAC 2007.

[13]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Innovization: innovating design principles through optimization , 2006, GECCO.

[14]  Amitabha Mukerjee,et al.  FUNCTIONAL PART FAMILIES AND DESIGN CHANGE FOR MECHANICAL ASSEMBLIES , 2008, DAC 2008.

[15]  Bernd Fritzke,et al.  A Growing Neural Gas Network Learns Topologies , 1994, NIPS.

[16]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families , 2000 .

[17]  A. Messac,et al.  Normal Constraint Method with Guarantee of Even Representation of Complete Pareto Frontier , 2004 .

[18]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[19]  Matthew B. Parkinson,et al.  MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION IN PRODUCT PLATFORM DESIGN , 1999, DAC 1999.

[20]  Amitabha Mukerjee,et al.  Discovering implicit constraints in design , 2011, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.