Membrane Recruitment of Scaffold Proteins Drives Specific Signaling

Cells must give the right response to each stimulus they receive. Scaffolding, a signaling process mediated by scaffold proteins, participates in the decoding of the cues by specifically directing signal transduction. The aim of this paper is to describe the molecular mechanisms of scaffolding, i.e. the principles by which scaffold proteins drive a specific response of the cell. Since similar scaffold proteins are found in many species, they evolved according to the purpose of each organism. This means they require adaptability. In the usual description of the mechanisms of scaffolding, scaffold proteins are considered as reactors where molecules involved in a cascade of reactions are simultaneously bound with the right orientation to meet and interact. This description is not realistic: (i) it is not verified by experiments and (ii) timing and orientation constraints make it complex which seems to contradict the required adaptability. A scaffold protein, Ste5, is used in the MAPK pathway of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae for the cell to provide a specific response to stimuli. The massive amount of data available for this pathway makes it ideal to investigate the actual mechanisms of scaffolding. Here, a complete treatment of the chemical reactions allows the computation of the distributions of all the proteins involved in the MAPK pathway when the cell receives various cues. These distributions are compared to several experimental results. It turns out that the molecular mechanisms of scaffolding are much simpler and more adaptable than previously thought in the reactor model. Scaffold proteins bind only one molecule at a time. Then, their membrane recruitment automatically drives specific, amplified and localized signal transductions. The mechanisms presented here, which explain how the membrane recruitment of a protein can produce a drastic change in the activity of cells, are generic and may be commonly used in many biological processes.

[1]  E. Elion,et al.  Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae , 1994, Cell.

[2]  K. Clark,et al.  Association of the yeast pheromone response G protein beta gamma subunits with the MAP kinase scaffold Ste5p. , 1995, Science.

[3]  B. Cairns,et al.  Signaling in the yeast pheromone response pathway: specific and high-affinity interaction of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases Kss1 and Fus3 with the upstream MAP kinase kinase Ste7 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[4]  Chi-Ying F. Huang,et al.  Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Thorner,et al.  Ste5 RING-H2 domain: role in Ste4-promoted oligomerization for yeast pheromone signaling. , 1997, Science.

[6]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Mechanistic Studies of the Dual Phosphorylation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  J. Massagué TGF-beta signal transduction. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[8]  M. Gustin,et al.  MAP Kinase Pathways in the YeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[9]  J E Ferrell,et al.  What Do Scaffold Proteins Really Do? , 2000, Science's STKE.

[10]  W. R. Burack,et al.  Signal transduction: hanging on a scaffold. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[11]  H V Westerhoff,et al.  Why cytoplasmic signalling proteins should be recruited to cell membranes. , 2000, Trends in cell biology.

[12]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  W. Sabbagh,et al.  Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[14]  M. Tyers,et al.  MAPK specificity in the yeast pheromone response independent of transcriptional activation , 2001, Current Biology.

[15]  T. Hughes,et al.  Role of scaffolds in MAP kinase pathway specificity revealed by custom design of pathway-dedicated signaling proteins , 2001, Current Biology.

[16]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[17]  M. Tyers,et al.  MAPK signaling specificity: it takes two to tango. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[18]  D. Morrison,et al.  Regulation of MAP kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in mammals. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[19]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[20]  R. Collins "Getting it on"--GDI displacement and small GTPase membrane recruitment. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[21]  Wonhwa Cho,et al.  Membrane-binding and activation mechanism of PTEN , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rewiring MAP Kinase Pathways Using Alternative Scaffold Assembly Mechanisms , 2003, Science.

[23]  B. Errede,et al.  Regulation of Ste7 Ubiquitination by Ste11 Phosphorylation and the Skp1-Cullin-F-box Complex* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Lan Huang,et al.  Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[25]  R. Lundmark,et al.  Regulated Membrane Recruitment of Dynamin-2 Mediated by Sorting Nexin 9* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  Chunfa Huang,et al.  High glucose-induced membrane translocation of PKC betaI is associated with Arf6 in glomerular mesangial cells. , 2004, Molecular and cellular biochemistry.

[27]  S. Etienne-Manneville,et al.  Cdc42 - the centre of polarity , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[28]  S. Scarlata,et al.  Influence of membrane components in the binding of proteins to membrane surfaces. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[29]  H. Madhani,et al.  Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[30]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Signaling switches and bistability arising from multisite phosphorylation in protein kinase cascades , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  John D. Scott,et al.  AKAP signalling complexes: focal points in space and time , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A conserved protein interaction network involving the yeast MAP kinases Fus3 and Kss1 , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  P. Heinrich,et al.  Janus Kinase (Jak) Subcellular Localization Revisited , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  A. Rudich,et al.  Nelfinavir-induced insulin resistance is associated with impaired plasma membrane recruitment of the PI 3-kinase effectors Akt/PKB and PKC-ζ , 2004, Diabetologia.

[35]  Sebastian Maurer-Stroh,et al.  Crystal structure of the p14/MP1 scaffolding complex: how a twin couple attaches mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling to late endosomes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  T. Kirchhausen,et al.  The Small G-protein Arf6GTP Recruits the AP-2 Adaptor Complex to Membranes* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases with Distinct Requirements for Ste5 Scaffolding Influence Signaling Specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[38]  Soichi Wakatsuki,et al.  Membrane recruitment of effector proteins by Arf and Rab GTPases. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[39]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  A theoretical framework for specificity in cell signaling , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[40]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[41]  Elaine A. Elion,et al.  Signaling Specificity in Yeast , 2005, Science.

[42]  R. Xavier,et al.  Membrane recruitment of NOD2 in intestinal epithelial cells is essential for nuclear factor–κB activation in muramyl dipeptide recognition , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  M. Reth,et al.  A leucine zipper in the N terminus confers membrane association to SLP-65 , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[44]  W. Kolch Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[45]  J. Trejo,et al.  A requirement for membrane cholesterol in the β-arrestin- and clathrin-dependent endocytosis of LPA1 lysophosphatidic acid receptors , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[46]  M. Ahmadian,et al.  An electrostatic steering mechanism of Cdc42 recognition by Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome proteins. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[47]  Maosong Qi,et al.  Signal transduction. Signaling specificity in yeast. , 2005, Science.

[48]  G. Baillie,et al.  Phosphodiesterase-4 influences the PKA phosphorylation status and membrane translocation of G-protein receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) in HEK-293beta2 cells and cardiac myocytes. , 2006, The Biochemical journal.

[49]  Matthias Peter,et al.  Scaffold proteins in MAP kinase signaling: more than simple passive activating platforms , 2006, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[50]  T. Elston,et al.  Bistability, stochasticity, and oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Aipo Diao,et al.  Membrane targeting and activation of the Lowe syndrome protein OCRL1 by rab GTPases , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[52]  Roger L. Williams,et al.  Structural and Membrane Binding Analysis of the Phox Homology Domain of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase-C2α* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  W. Hong,et al.  RILP interacts with VPS22 and VPS36 of ESCRT-II and regulates their membrane recruitment. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[54]  Tomonobu M. Watanabe,et al.  Single-molecule analysis of chemoattractant-stimulated membrane recruitment of a PH-domain-containing protein , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[55]  Soichi Wakatsuki,et al.  Structural basis for Rab11-dependent membrane recruitment of a family of Rab11-interacting protein 3 (FIP3)/Arfophilin-1 , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Increased Membrane Affinity of the C1 Domain of Protein Kinase Cδ Compensates for the Lack of Involvement of Its C2 Domain in Membrane Recruitment* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  Caleb J Bashor,et al.  The Ste5 Scaffold Allosterically Modulates Signaling Output of the Yeast Mating Pathway , 2006, Science.

[58]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  Mathematical models of specificity in cell signaling. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[59]  Y. Noda,et al.  Specific membrane recruitment of Uso1 protein, the essential endoplasmic reticulum‐to‐Golgi tethering factor in yeast vesicular transport , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[60]  P. Hordijk,et al.  Rac1‐induced cell migration requires membrane recruitment of the nuclear oncogene SET , 2007, The EMBO journal.