Power in mixed-sex stranger interactions

The authors tested the approach/inhibition theory of power by examining teasing interactions between women and men in conditions in which either one was given elevated power or they were in an equal-power control condition. Consistent with hypotheses, high-power individuals behaved in a disinhibited fashion and were less accurate judges of their partner's emotion, whereas low-power individuals behaved in a more inhibited, indirect fashion and reported more self-conscious/anxiety-related emotion. Additional contrast analyses revealed only modest support for the claim that men would act in powerful fashion in the absence of explicit power differences, and that power-based differences were greatest when the man had power over the woman. Discussion focuses on different perspectives on the interaction between power and gender.

[1]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attractiveness of the underling: an automatic power --> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  P Raymond,et al.  Attractiveness of the underling: an automatic power --> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002 .

[5]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  M. J. Harris,et al.  Why's My Boss Always Holding Me Down? A Meta-Analysis of Power Effects on Performance Evaluations , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[7]  Antony S R Manstead,et al.  Gender and culture differences in emotion. , 2004, Emotion.

[8]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  S. Snodgrass,et al.  Further efiects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity , 1992 .

[10]  Moskowitz Ds.  Does elevated power lead to approach and reduced power to inhibition? Comment on Keltner, Gruenfeld, and Anderson (2003). , 2004 .

[11]  F. Pratto.  Sexual politics: The gender gap in the bedroom, the cupboard, and the cabinet. , 1996 .

[12]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Status, Gender, and Nonverbal Behavior: A Study of Structured Interactions between Employees of a Company , 1999 .

[13]  Bernadette Park,et al.  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Copeland,et al.  Prophecies of power : motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation , 1994 .

[15]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior , 1985 .

[17]  A. Eagly.  Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[18]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[19]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[20]  C. Judd,et al.  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  K. Grammer.  Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters , 1990 .

[22]  C. Anderson,et al.  Emotional convergence between people over time. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Studies in Social Power. , 1960 .

[24]  I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt.  Love and hate : the natural history of behavior patterns , 1975 .

[25]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[26]  D. Moskowitz.  Does elevated power lead to approach and reduced power to inhibition? Comment on Keltner, Gruenfeld, and Anderson (2003). , 2004, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Davidson.  Emotion and Affective Style: Hemispheric Substrates , 1992 .

[28]  A. Caspi,et al.  Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  T. Henley,et al.  Perceptions of Women's Power as a Function of Position Within an Organization , 2000, The Journal of psychology.