Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase from Bacillus subtilis (strain XAS)

Abstract The food enzyme is an endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase (4‐β‐d‐xylan xylanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.8) produced with the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain XAS. Antibiotic resistance genes are present in the production organism on a self‐replicative vector. The endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase is intended to be used in baking processes. Based on the maximum use levels, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.014 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no‐observed‐adverse‐effect level (NOAEL) of 55 mg TOS/kg bw per day that, compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a sufficiently high margin of exposure (MOE) (of at least 3,600). Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood to occur is considered to be low. Since the absence of viable cells in the food enzyme has not been adequately demonstrated, the Panel cannot conclude on the risks associated with the possible spread of a genetically modified bacterial strain carrying antimicrobial resistance determinants.

[1]  X. Baur,et al.  Baker’s Asthma due to Xylanase and Cellulase without Sensitization to Alpha-Amylase and Only Weak Sensitization to Flour , 2001, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[2]  H. van Loveren,et al.  Guidance on allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants , 2017, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[3]  R. Rawbone,et al.  Prevalence of sensitisation to cellulase and xylanase in bakery workers , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  L. Poulsen,et al.  Allergy assessment of foods or ingredients derived from biotechnology, gene-modified organisms, or novel foods. , 2004, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[5]  Bastien Chevreux,et al.  The Origins of 168, W23, and Other Bacillus subtilis Legacy Strains , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  T. R. Licht,et al.  Bibliographic review on the potential of microorganisms, microbial products and enzymes to induce respiratory sensitization , 2010, EFSA Supporting Publications.

[7]  Test No. 408: Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents , 2018, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4.

[8]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Guidance of EFSA: Use of the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database in exposure assessment , 2011 .

[9]  M. F. Poças,et al.  Exposure assessment of food enzymes , 2016 .

[10]  X. Baur,et al.  Baking additives as new allergens in baker's asthma. , 1988, Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases.

[11]  J. Brisman Baker's asthma , 2002, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[12]  Flavourings EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids), 2016. Scientific opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 313, (FGE.313): α,β-unsaturated 3(2H)-furanone derivatives from chemical group 13 , 2016 .

[13]  TG 442D OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method , 2000 .

[14]  A. Díaz‐Perales,et al.  Why can patients with baker's asthma tolerate wheat flour ingestion? Is wheat pollen allergy relevant? , 2009, Allergologia et immunopathologia.