Non-degradative Ubiquitination of Protein Kinases

Growing evidence supports other regulatory roles for protein ubiquitination in addition to serving as a tag for proteasomal degradation. In contrast to other common post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, little is known about how non-degradative ubiquitination modulates protein structure, dynamics, and function. Due to the wealth of knowledge concerning protein kinase structure and regulation, we examined kinase ubiquitination using ubiquitin remnant immunoaffinity enrichment and quantitative mass spectrometry to identify ubiquitinated kinases and the sites of ubiquitination in Jurkat and HEK293 cells. We find that, unlike phosphorylation, ubiquitination most commonly occurs in structured domains, and on the kinase domain, ubiquitination is concentrated in regions known to be important for regulating activity. We hypothesized that ubiquitination, like other post-translational modifications, may alter the conformational equilibrium of the modified protein. We chose one human kinase, ZAP-70, to simulate using molecular dynamics with and without a monoubiquitin modification. In Jurkat cells, ZAP-70 is ubiquitinated at several sites that are not sensitive to proteasome inhibition and thus may have other regulatory roles. Our simulations show that ubiquitination influences the conformational ensemble of ZAP-70 in a site-dependent manner. When monoubiquitinated at K377, near the C-helix, the active conformation of the ZAP-70 C-helix is disrupted. In contrast, when monoubiquitinated at K476, near the kinase hinge region, an active-like ZAP-70 C-helix conformation is stabilized. These results lead to testable hypotheses that ubiquitination directly modulates kinase activity, and that ubiquitination is likely to alter structure, dynamics, and function in other protein classes as well.

[1]  J. Kuriyan,et al.  The Conformational Plasticity of Protein Kinases , 2002, Cell.

[2]  J. Varkey,et al.  Semisynthetic, site-specific ubiquitin modification of α-synuclein reveals differential effects on aggregation. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  P. R. Elliott,et al.  Assembly and Specific Recognition of K29- and K33-Linked Polyubiquitin , 2015, Molecular cell.

[4]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 , 2007, Bioinform..

[5]  Fumio Hanaoka,et al.  Crystal structure of thymine DNA glycosylase conjugated to SUMO-1 , 2005, Nature.

[6]  G. Lienhard,et al.  Non-functional phosphorylations? , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  John Kuriyan,et al.  Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Tyrosine Kinase Activity of ZAP-70 , 2007, Cell.

[8]  Jörg Weiser,et al.  Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO) , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  Zhijian J. Chen,et al.  Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[10]  M. Washington,et al.  Structure of Monoubiquitinated PCNA and Implications for Translesion Synthesis and DNA Polymerase Exchange , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Histone H2B ubiquitylation disrupts local and higher order chromatin compaction , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[12]  S. Engelender,et al.  Site-specific differences in proteasome-dependent degradation of monoubiquitinated α-synuclein. , 2013, Chemistry & biology.

[13]  A. Newton,et al.  Protein kinase C: structural and spatial regulation by phosphorylation, cofactors, and macromolecular interactions. , 2001, Chemical reviews.

[14]  A. Varshavsky The N-end rule , 1992, Cell.

[15]  N. Krogan,et al.  Dispersed sites of HIV Vif-dependent polyubiquitination in the DNA deaminase APOBEC3F. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  C. Wolberger,et al.  Role of a non-canonical surface of Rad6 in ubiquitin conjugating activity , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  Javad Golji,et al.  Phosphorylation primes vinculin for activation. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[18]  H. Jennissen,et al.  Modulation of calmodulin function by ubiquitin-calmodulin ligase and identification of the responsible ubiquitylation site in vertebrate calmodulin. , 1998, European journal of biochemistry.

[19]  Ming-Yih Lai,et al.  Structural and biochemical studies of the open state of Lys48-linked diubiquitin. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  P. Loll,et al.  Crystal structures of Lys‐63‐linked tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin reveal a highly extended chain architecture , 2009, Proteins.

[21]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Analogous regulatory sites within the αC-β4 loop regions of ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase and AGC kinases , 2008 .

[22]  Á. Tóth-Petróczy,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in ubiquitination substrates. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  W. Lim,et al.  Systematic Functional Prioritization of Protein Posttranslational Modifications , 2012, Cell.

[24]  Steven M. Lewis,et al.  Mechanism of ubiquitin ligation and lysine prioritization by a HECT E3 , 2013, eLife.

[25]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[26]  P. Tompa,et al.  Tripartite degrons confer diversity and specificity on regulated protein degradation in the ubiquitin-proteasome system , 2016, Nature Communications.

[27]  P. Doherty,et al.  Regulation of ZAP-70 activation and TCR signaling by two related proteins, Sts-1 and Sts-2. , 2004, Immunity.

[28]  Y. Duan,et al.  Effects of posttranslational modifications on the structure and dynamics of histone H3 N-terminal Peptide. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[29]  M. Carson,et al.  Structure of a diubiquitin conjugate and a model for interaction with ubiquitin conjugating enzyme (E2). , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[30]  Samie R Jaffrey,et al.  Global analysis of lysine ubiquitination by ubiquitin remnant immunoaffinity profiling , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Barry Honig,et al.  Loop modeling: Sampling, filtering, and scoring , 2007, Proteins.

[32]  J. Zierath,et al.  AMP-activated protein kinase signaling in metabolic regulation. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[33]  Aydin Haririnia,et al.  Solution Conformation of Lys63-linked Di-ubiquitin Chain Provides Clues to Functional Diversity of Polyubiquitin Signaling* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  C. Elly,et al.  Itch E3 ligase-mediated regulation of TGF-beta signaling by modulating smad2 phosphorylation. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[35]  Christopher L. McClendon,et al.  Dynamic architecture of a protein kinase , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  A. Garcia,et al.  Evaluation of direct effects of protein ubiquitylation using computational analysis , 2006 .

[37]  Eric T. Kim,et al.  Oncogenic Mutations Counteract Intrinsic Disorder in the EGFR Kinase and Promote Receptor Dimerization , 2012, Cell.

[38]  S. Carr,et al.  Large-scale identification of ubiquitination sites by mass spectrometry , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[39]  J R Yates,et al.  Selective degradation of ubiquitinated Sic1 by purified 26S proteasome yields active S phase cyclin-Cdk. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[40]  Y. Levy,et al.  Nonspecific yet decisive: Ubiquitination can affect the native‐state dynamics of the modified protein , 2015, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  C. Landry,et al.  Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[42]  Cynthia Wolberger,et al.  Crystal structure and solution NMR studies of Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin at neutral pH. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  The origins and evolution of ubiquitination sites. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[44]  R. Roskoski,et al.  Src kinase regulation by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[45]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  The structure and conformation of Lys63-linked tetraubiquitin. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Analysis Tool Web Services from the EMBL-EBI , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  R. D. Fisher,et al.  Structure and Ubiquitin Binding of the Ubiquitin-interacting Motif* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  David Komander,et al.  Lys11-linked ubiquitin chains adopt compact conformations and are preferentially hydrolyzed by the deubiquitinase Cezanne , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[49]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[50]  Matthew P. Jacobson,et al.  Phosphorylation of the Arp2 Subunit Relieves Auto-inhibitory Interactions for Arp2/3 Complex Activation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  John A Tainer,et al.  Structurally distinct ubiquitin- and sumo-modified PCNA: implications for their distinct roles in the DNA damage response. , 2015, Structure.

[52]  C. Elly,et al.  Cbl Promotes Ubiquitination of the T Cell Receptor ζ through an Adaptor Function of Zap-70* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  M. Wilmanns,et al.  Structural and functional diversity in the activity and regulation of DAPK‐related protein kinases , 2013, The FEBS journal.

[54]  José D Faraldo-Gómez,et al.  Molecular Mechanism of Selective Recruitment of Syk Kinases by the Membrane Antigen-Receptor Complex* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  F. Alt,et al.  SIRT3 deacetylates mitochondrial 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA synthase 2 and regulates ketone body production. , 2010, Cell metabolism.

[56]  David Klenerman,et al.  Ubiquitin chain conformation regulates recognition and activity of interacting proteins , 2012, Nature.

[57]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Surface comparison of active and inactive protein kinases identifies a conserved activation mechanism , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  J. Kuriyan,et al.  Stability of an autoinhibitory interface in the structure of the tyrosine kinase ZAP-70 impacts T cell receptor response , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[60]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[61]  Lin Dong,et al.  Protein tyrosine kinase regulation by ubiquitination: critical roles of Cbl-family ubiquitin ligases. , 2013, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[62]  Arthur Weiss,et al.  ZAP-70: an essential kinase in T-cell signaling. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[63]  A. Weiss,et al.  The Syk family of protein tyrosine kinases in T‐cell activation and development , 1998, Immunological reviews.

[64]  A. Chernorudskiy,et al.  Ubiquitin System: Direct Effects Join the Signaling , 2013, Science Signaling.

[65]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL–EBI , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[66]  Eugene C. Petrella,et al.  The Three-dimensional Structure of the ZAP-70 Kinase Domain in Complex with Staurosporine , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[67]  H. Walczak,et al.  Linear ubiquitination: a newly discovered regulator of cell signalling. , 2013, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[68]  Kenichiro Fujiwara,et al.  Structural basis for distinct roles of Lys63‐ and Lys48‐linked polyubiquitin chains , 2004, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[69]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[70]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[71]  J. Yates,et al.  K33-linked polyubiquitination of T cell receptor-zeta regulates proteolysis-independent T cell signaling. , 2010, Immunity.

[72]  S. Fisher,et al.  An investigation into the protonation states of the C1 domain of cardiac myosin-binding protein C. , 2008, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[73]  M. Gossen,et al.  Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells. , 1995, Science.

[74]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  The ubiquitin system. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[75]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments , 2014, Bioinform..

[76]  H. Dohlman,et al.  Differences in the Regulation of K-Ras and H-Ras Isoforms by Monoubiquitination* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[77]  K. Chiang,et al.  Structure-activity analysis of semisynthetic nucleosomes: mechanistic insights into the stimulation of Dot1L by ubiquitylated histone H2B. , 2009, ACS chemical biology.

[78]  Leonardo Morsut,et al.  FAM/USP9x, a Deubiquitinating Enzyme Essential for TGFβ Signaling, Controls Smad4 Monoubiquitination , 2009, Cell.

[79]  L. Cesaro,et al.  A Comparative Analysis and Review of lysyl Residues Affected by Posttranslational Modifications , 2015, Current genomics.

[80]  E. Lees Cyclin dependent kinase regulation. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[81]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Dynamics of cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase , 2001 .

[82]  William C. Swope,et al.  The role of long ranged forces in determining the structure and properties of liquid water , 1983 .

[83]  J. Chin,et al.  Engineered Diubiquitin Synthesis Reveals K29-Isopeptide Specificity of an Otu Deubiquitinase , 2010 .

[84]  S. Fields,et al.  Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation , 2013, Nature Methods.

[85]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Multisite Phosphorylation Disrupts Arginine-Glutamate Salt Bridge Networks Required for Binding of Cytoplasmic Linker-associated Protein 2 (CLASP2) to End-binding Protein 1 (EB1)* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[86]  A. Matouschek,et al.  ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[87]  John Rush,et al.  Quantitative Proteomics Reveals the Function of Unconventional Ubiquitin Chains in Proteasomal Degradation , 2009, Cell.

[88]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  Ubiquitination of K-Ras Enhances Activation and Facilitates Binding to Select Downstream Effectors , 2011, Science Signaling.

[89]  John Kuriyan,et al.  The structure, regulation, and function of ZAP‐70 , 2009, Immunological reviews.

[90]  I. Ota,et al.  A Proteolytic Pathway That Recognizes Ubiquitin as a Degradation Signal (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[91]  H. C. Andersen Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature , 1980 .

[92]  Américo Rodrigues,et al.  Mechanisms of regulation of SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 protein kinases , 2014, Front. Plant Sci..

[93]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  Corrigendum to “The Structure and Conformation of Lys63-Linked Tetraubiquitin” [J. Mol. Biol. 392 (2009) 1117–1124] , 2014 .

[94]  Steven M. Lewis,et al.  Site–Specific Monoubiquitination Activates Ras by Impeding GTPase Activating Protein Function , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[95]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[96]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Analogous regulatory sites within the alphaC-beta4 loop regions of ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase and AGC kinases. , 2008, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.

[97]  Robert C Piper,et al.  Insights into ubiquitin transfer cascades from a structure of a UbcH5B approximately ubiquitin-HECT(NEDD4L) complex. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[98]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  Ubiquitin not only serves as a tag but also assists degradation by inducing protein unfolding , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  S. Geschwindner,et al.  Crystal structure and NMR studies of the apo SH2 domains of ZAP-70: two bikes rather than a tandem. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[100]  C. Pickart,et al.  Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[101]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Locking the active conformation of c-Src kinase through the phosphorylation of the activation loop. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[102]  George M. Church,et al.  Preferred in vivo ubiquitination sites , 2004, Bioinform..

[103]  Matthew P Jacobson,et al.  Computational studies of protein regulation by post-translational phosphorylation. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[104]  Ying E. Zhang,et al.  Non-degradative ubiquitination in Smad-dependent TGF-β signaling , 2011, Cell & Bioscience.

[105]  C. Heldin,et al.  The type I TGF-β receptor engages TRAF6 to activate TAK1 in a receptor kinase-independent manner , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[106]  Michael Gale,et al.  Innate immunity against HIV-1 infection , 2015, Nature Immunology.

[107]  Marietta Y. W. T. Lee,et al.  Structure of monoubiquitinated PCNA , 2012, Cell cycle.

[108]  David Komander,et al.  Molecular discrimination of structurally equivalent Lys 63‐linked and linear polyubiquitin chains , 2009, EMBO reports.

[109]  Takeshi Imamura,et al.  Regulation of TGF-β family signalling by ubiquitination and deubiquitination. , 2013, Journal of biochemistry.

[110]  J. Frydman,et al.  Principles of cotranslational ubiquitination and quality control at the ribosome. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[111]  J. P. Jensen,et al.  Activation-dependent ubiquitination of a T cell antigen receptor subunit on multiple intracellular lysines. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[112]  John Kuriyan,et al.  Structural Basis for Activation of ZAP-70 by Phosphorylation of the SH2-Kinase Linker , 2013, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[113]  L. Frati,et al.  Ubiquitination and degradation of Syk and ZAP-70 protein tyrosine kinases in human NK cells upon CD16 engagement , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[114]  D. Fushman,et al.  Structural properties of polyubiquitin chains in solution. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[115]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[116]  Sebastian A. Wagner,et al.  A Proteome-wide, Quantitative Survey of In Vivo Ubiquitylation Sites Reveals Widespread Regulatory Roles* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[117]  Adam W Van Wynsberghe,et al.  Solution X-ray scattering combined with computational modeling reveals multiple conformations of covalently bound ubiquitin on PCNA , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.