Effect of X-ray Tube Parameters, Iodine Concentration, and Patient Size on Image Quality in Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Chest-Phantom-Study

Objectives:The aim of this phantom study was to evaluate the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in pulmonary computed tomography (CT)-angiography for 300 and 400 mg iodine/mL contrast media using variable x-ray tube parameters and patient sizes. We also analyzed the possible strategies of dose reduction in patients with different sizes. Materials and Methods:The segmental pulmonary arteries were simulated by plastic tubes filled with 1:30 diluted solutions of 300 and 400 mg iodine/mL contrast media in a chest phantom mimicking thick, intermediate, and thin patients. Volume scanning was done with a CT scanner at 80, 100, 120, and 140 kVp. Tube current-time products (mAs) varied between 50 and 120% of the optimal value given by the built-in automatic dose optimization protocol. Attenuation values and CNR for both contrast media were evaluated and compared with the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). Figure of merit, calculated as CNR2/CTDIvol, was used to quantify image quality improvement per exposure risk to the patient. Results:Attenuation of iodinated contrast media increased both with decreasing tube voltage and patient size. A CTDIvol reduction by 44% was achieved in the thin phantom with the use of 80 instead of 140 kVp without deterioration of CNR. Figure of merit correlated with kVp in the thin phantom (r = −0.897 to −0.999; P < 0.05) but not in the intermediate and thick phantoms (P = 0.09–0.71), reflecting a decreasing benefit of tube voltage reduction on image quality as the thickness of the phantom increased. Compared with the 300 mg iodine/mL concentration, the same CNR for 400 mg iodine/mL contrast medium was achieved at a lower CTDIvol by 18 to 40%, depending on phantom size and applied tube voltage. Conclusions:Low kVp protocols for pulmonary embolism are potentially advantageous especially in thin and, to a lesser extent, in intermediate patients. Thin patients profit from low voltage protocols preserving a good CNR at a lower exposure. The use of 80 kVp in obese patients may be problematic because of the limitation of the tube current available, reduced CNR, and high skin dose. The high CNR of the 400 mg iodine/mL contrast medium together with lower tube energy and/or current can be used for exposure reduction.

[1]  M Ashtari,et al.  Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax: comparison with the standard-dose technique. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Application of Automatic Vertical Positioning Software to Reduce Radiation Exposure in Multidetector Row Computed Tomography of the Chest , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[3]  A Stargardt,et al.  Individually Adapted Examination Protocols for Reduction of Radiation Exposure in Chest CT , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Sabee Molloi,et al.  Effect of area x-ray beam equalization on image quality and dose in digital mammography. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  J. Paul,et al.  Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  E. Fishman,et al.  IV contrast selection for MDCT: current thoughts and practice. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Jan Menke,et al.  Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  U. Schoepf,et al.  CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  J. Goo,et al.  CTA Contrast Enhancement of the Aorta and Pulmonary Artery: The Effect of Saline Chase Injected at Two Different Rates in a Canine Experimental Model , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[10]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  G. Becker,et al.  In vitro study of high-pressure catheters and various contrast agents. , 1988, Radiology.

[12]  F. Knollmann,et al.  [Iodine delivery rate of different concentrations of iodine-containing contrast agents with rapid injection]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[13]  A. Berghold,et al.  MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: influence of body weight, body mass index, and scan length on arterial enhancement at different iodine flow rates. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  M. Tillich,et al.  MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: influence of iodine flow concentration on vessel attenuation and visualization. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  U. Stöckle,et al.  Refresherkurs Spiral-CT bei Polytrauma – Effektives Untersuchungsprotokoll mit 16-Schicht-Spiral-CT: „Rush-CT“ , 2004 .

[16]  Jo-Anne Shepard,et al.  Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Stefan Delorme,et al.  Improved Vascular Opacification in Cerebral Computed Tomography Angiography With 80 kVp , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[18]  P. Vock,et al.  Low-dose multislice CT of the thorax in follow-up of malignant lymphoma and extrapulmonary primary tumors , 2003, European Radiology.

[19]  M. Macari,et al.  Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms at multi-detector row CT angiography: intravascular enhancement without a timing acquisition. , 2001, Radiology.

[20]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. , 2006, Radiology.

[21]  D. DeLong,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms at multi-detector row helical CT: optimization with interactive determination of scanning delay and contrast medium dose. , 2004, Radiology.

[22]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[23]  W Huda,et al.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[24]  John M Boone,et al.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. , 2003, Radiology.