A meme propagation model to combine social affirmation with meme attractiveness and persistence

The propagation of memes on online social networks often depends on the mechanism of social affirmation. Centola termed such social-affirmation-driven diffusion as complex contagion and partly validated it through an online experiment. However, for actual online meme propagation, the mechanism of social affirmation often takes effect in combination with various other factors and mechanisms. In this paper, we examine the combinatorial effects of social affirmation and the attractiveness and persistence of the meme by proposing and analyzing a UACI model, where an agent’s activities to receive and transfer a meme is associated with the transition between its four possible states of “Uninformed”, “Attended”,“Convinced” and “Immune”. The numerical simulations illustrate nontrivial patterns of propagation. Especially, it is revealed that the effects of simple and complex contagions co-exist and equilibrate in accordance with the joint functions of meme attractiveness and social affirmation. Furthermore, the low-persistence of the meme hinders the propagation-scale more remarkably on the regular network than on the random one, indicating that the persistence may be critical for retaining complex contagion.

[1]  R. Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Activity driven modeling of time varying networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[2]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Junjie Wu,et al.  Weak ties: subtle role of information diffusion in online social networks. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Competition among memes in a world with limited attention , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Herbert W. Hethcote,et al.  The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[6]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[7]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[8]  Duanbing Chen,et al.  The small world yields the most effective information spreading , 2011, ArXiv.

[9]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[10]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[11]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[12]  Spain,et al.  Cascade Dynamics of Complex Propagation , 2005, physics/0504165.

[13]  Ying Zhang,et al.  An information diffusion model based on retweeting mechanism for online social media , 2012 .

[14]  N. Lee,et al.  Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network , 2007 .

[15]  Linyuan Lü,et al.  Spreading in online social networks: the role of social reinforcement. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter , 2011, ArXiv.

[17]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  The form of the forgetting curve and the fate of memories , 2011 .

[18]  Jiajia Wang,et al.  SIR rumor spreading model in the new media age , 2013 .