Magnetic resonance imaging of short T2 components in tissue.

The most widely used clinical magnetic resonance imaging techniques for the diagnosis of parenchymal disease employ heavily T(2)-weighted sequences to detect an increase or decrease in the signal from long T(2) components in tissue. Tissues also contain short T(2) components that are not detected or only poorly detected with conventional sequences. These components are the majority species in tendons, ligaments, menisci, periosteum, cortical bone and other related tissues, and the minority in many other tissues that have predominantly long T(2) components.The development and clinical application of techniques to detect short T(2) components are just beginning. Such techniques include magic angle imaging, as well as short echo time (TE), and ultrashort TE (Ute) pulse sequences. Magic angle imaging increases the T(2) of highly ordered, collagen-rich tissues such as tendons and ligaments so signal can be detected from them with conventional pulse sequences. Ute sequences detect short T(2) components before they have decayed, both in tissues with a majority of short T(2) components and those with a minority. In the latter case steps usually need to be taken to suppress the signal from the majority of long T(2) components. Fat suppression of different types may also be helpful. Once signal from short T(2) components has been detected, different pulse sequences can be used to determine increases or decreases in T(1) and T(2) and study contrast enhancement. Using these approaches, signals have been detected from normal tissues with a majority of short T(2) components such as tendons, ligaments, menisci, periosteum, cortical bone, dentine and enamel (the latter four tissues for the first time) as well as from the other tissues in which short T(2) components are a minority. Some diseases such as chronic fibrosis, gliosis, haemorrhage and calcification may increase the signal from short T(2) components while others such as loss of tissue, loss of order in tissue and an increase in water content may decrease them. Changes of these types have been demonstrated in tendonopathy, intervertebral disc disease, ligament injury, haemachromatosis, pituitary perivascular fibrosis, gliomas, multiple sclerosis and angiomas. Use of these techniques has reduced the limit of clinical detectability of short T(2) components by about two orders of magnitude from about 10 ms to about 100 micros. As a consequence it is now possible to study tissues that have a majority of short T(2) components with both "bright" and "dark" approaches, with the bright (high signal) approach offering options for developing tissue contrast of different types, as well as the potential for tissue characterization. In addition, tissues with a minority of short T(2) components may demonstrate changes in disease that are not apparent with conventional heavily T(2)-weighted sequences.

[1]  H. Genant,et al.  "Magic-angle" phenomenon: a cause of increased signal in the normal lateral meniscus on short-TE MR images of the knee. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Krishna S. Nayak,et al.  Imaging Ultra-short T2 Species in the Brain , 2000 .

[3]  M. Bronskill,et al.  Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  L. Schreiner,et al.  Proton NMR spin grouping and exchange in dentin. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[5]  P. Gillis,et al.  Structure and dynamics of water in tendon from NMR relaxation measurements. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[6]  D. Firmin,et al.  FID‐based lung MRI at 0.5 T: Theoretical considerations and practical implications , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  I. Vavasour,et al.  A pathology-MRI study of the short-T2 component in formalin-fixed multiple sclerosis brain , 2000, Neurology.

[8]  J M Pauly,et al.  Lung parenchyma: projection reconstruction MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[9]  Dipolar contrast for dense tissues imaging. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[10]  L R Frank,et al.  Short echo time projection reconstruction MR imaging of cartilage: comparison with fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS and magnetization transfer contrast MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  Albert Macovski,et al.  MR Spectroscopic imaging of collagen: Tendons and knee menisci , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  M. Bronskill,et al.  Magnetization Transfer and T2 Relaxation Components in Tissue , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  G M Bydder,et al.  MR Imaging: Clinical Use of the Inversion Recovery Sequence , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Aging and the human pituitary gland. , 1993, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[15]  G. Navon,et al.  Multiquantum filters and order in tissues , 2001, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  C F Beaulieu,et al.  MR imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: new methods using ultrashort TEs. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  K. Ikoma,et al.  (1)H double-quantum filtered MR imaging of joints tissues: bound water specific imaging of tendons, ligaments and cartilage. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  L. Schreiner,et al.  Composition and relaxation of the proton magnetization of human enamel and its contribution to the tooth NMR image , 1984, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  P. Koblik,et al.  Short echo time magnetic resonance imaging of tendon. , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[20]  J. Hajnal,et al.  Magnetic resonance: magic angle imaging of the Achilles tendon , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  Adapted techniques for clinical MR imaging of tendons , 1995, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[22]  D. Larkman,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magic-angle MR imaging of the Achilles tendon. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  G. Fullerton,et al.  Orientation of tendons in the magnetic field and its effect on T2 relaxation times. , 1985, Radiology.

[24]  A. Gad,et al.  Intratendinous Alterations as Imaged by Ultrasound and Contrast Medium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance in Chronic Achillodynia , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[25]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review , 2001, NMR in biomedicine.

[26]  C. Hayes,et al.  The Magic Angle Effect in Musculoskeletal MR Imaging , 1996, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[27]  Herman J. C. Berendsen,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance study of collagen hydration , 1962 .