Evolution and Classification of Myosins, a Paneukaryotic Whole-Genome Approach

Myosins are key components of the eukaryotic cytoskeleton, providing motility for a broad diversity of cargoes. Therefore, understanding the origin and evolutionary history of myosin classes is crucial to address the evolution of eukaryote cell biology. Here, we revise the classification of myosins using an updated taxon sampling that includes newly or recently sequenced genomes and transcriptomes from key taxa. We performed a survey of eukaryotic genomes and phylogenetic analyses of the myosin gene family, reconstructing the myosin toolkit at different key nodes in the eukaryotic tree of life. We also identified the phylogenetic distribution of myosin diversity in terms of number of genes, associated protein domains and number of classes in each taxa. Our analyses show that new classes (i.e., paralogs) and domain architectures were continuously generated throughout eukaryote evolution, with a significant expansion of myosin abundance and domain architectural diversity at the stem of Holozoa, predating the origin of animal multicellularity. Indeed, single-celled holozoans have the most complex myosin complement among eukaryotes, with paralogs of most myosins previously considered animal specific. We recover a dynamic evolutionary history, with several lineage-specific expansions (e.g., the myosin III-like gene family diversification in choanoflagellates), convergence in protein domain architectures (e.g., fungal and animal chitin synthase myosins), and important secondary losses. Overall, our evolutionary scheme demonstrates that the ancestral eukaryote likely had a complex myosin repertoire that included six genes with different protein domain architectures. Finally, we provide an integrative and robust classification, useful for future genomic and functional studies on this crucial eukaryotic gene family.

[1]  L. Farinelli,et al.  Gain and loss of multiple functionally related, horizontally transferred genes in the reduced genomes of two microsporidian parasites , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  P. Keeling,et al.  The evolutionary history of haptophytes and cryptophytes: phylogenomic evidence for separate origins , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  M. Riley,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of the myosin superfamily. , 1993, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[4]  O. Gascuel,et al.  An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  E. Koonin Orthologs, Paralogs, and Evolutionary Genomics 1 , 2005 .

[6]  B. Wickstead,et al.  Patterns of kinesin evolution reveal a complex ancestral eukaryote with a multifunctional cytoskeleton , 2010, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[7]  Nicolas Lartillot,et al.  PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating , 2009, Bioinform..

[8]  Gerard Manning,et al.  The protist, Monosiga brevicollis, has a tyrosine kinase signaling network more elaborate and diverse than found in any known metazoan , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  B. Lang,et al.  Toward Resolving the Eukaryotic Tree: The Phylogenetic Positions of Jakobids and Cercozoans , 2007, Current Biology.

[10]  J. Pawlowski,et al.  Deep relationships of Rhizaria revealed by phylogenomics: a farewell to Haeckel's Radiolaria. , 2013, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[11]  W. Martin,et al.  An Overview of Endosymbiotic Models for the Origins of Eukaryotes, Their ATP-Producing Organelles (Mitochondria and Hydrogenosomes), and Their Heterotrophic Lifestyle , 2001, Biological chemistry.

[12]  M. A. Hartman,et al.  Principles of unconventional myosin function and targeting. , 2011, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[13]  E. M. De La Cruz,et al.  Vertebrate Myosin VIIb Is a High Duty Ratio Motor Adapted for Generating and Maintaining Tension* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Ray H. Gavin,et al.  Myosin genes in Tetrahymena. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[15]  Sagi Snir,et al.  Stability along with Extreme Variability in Core Genome Evolution , 2013, Genome biology and evolution.

[16]  Bas E. Dutilh,et al.  Assessment of phylogenomic and orthology approaches for phylogenetic inference , 2007, Bioinform..

[17]  J. Andersson Evolution of Patchily Distributed Proteins Shared between Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes: Dictyostelium as a Case Study , 2011, Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[18]  B. Lang,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships within the Opisthokonta based on phylogenomic analyses of conserved single-copy protein domains. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  B. Lang,et al.  Rooting the eukaryotic tree with mitochondrial and bacterial proteins. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[20]  Daniel P. Mulvihill,et al.  Regulation and function of the fission yeast myosins , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[21]  K. Katoh,et al.  MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  B. Robertson,et al.  Myosin-X is a molecular motor that functions in filopodia formation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  E. Koonin Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. , 2005, Annual review of genetics.

[24]  Anne Houdusse,et al.  Myosin VI Rewrites the Rules for Myosin Motors , 2010, Cell.

[25]  E. Koonin,et al.  Functional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[26]  B. Wickstead,et al.  Dyneins Across Eukaryotes: A Comparative Genomic Analysis , 2007, Traffic.

[27]  Hank Tu,et al.  The Genome of Naegleria gruberi Illuminates Early Eukaryotic Versatility , 2010, Cell.

[28]  Ronald D Vale,et al.  The Molecular Motor Toolbox for Intracellular Transport , 2003, Cell.

[29]  L. Holm,et al.  The Pfam protein families database , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  Myosin VI: cellular functions and motor properties , 2004 .

[31]  Christian M. Zmasek,et al.  This Déjà Vu Feeling—Analysis of Multidomain Protein Evolution in Eukaryotic Genomes , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  J. Andersson,et al.  Phylogenetic Analyses of Diplomonad Genes Reveal Frequent Lateral Gene Transfers Affecting Eukaryotes , 2003, Current Biology.

[33]  Hervé Philippe,et al.  Origin of land plants revisited in the light of sequence contamination and missing data , 2012, Current Biology.

[34]  G. Langford,et al.  Myosin superfamily evolutionary history , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[35]  David Q. Matus,et al.  Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life , 2008, Nature.

[36]  A. Nebenführ,et al.  The Tail that Wags the Dog: The Globular Tail Domain Defines the Function of Myosin V/XI , 2008, Traffic.

[37]  J. Massagué,et al.  Smad transcription factors. , 2005, Genes & development.

[38]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[39]  D. Biron,et al.  Extreme reduction and compaction of microsporidian genomes. , 2011, Research in microbiology.

[40]  M. Geeves,et al.  Shaking the myosin family tree: biochemical kinetics defines four types of myosin motor. , 2011, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[41]  Alexandros Stamatakis,et al.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models , 2006, Bioinform..

[42]  T. James,et al.  No jacket required – new fungal lineage defies dress code , 2012, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[43]  B. Degnan,et al.  Independent evolution of striated muscles in cnidarians and bilaterians , 2012, Nature.

[44]  N. Hall,et al.  Horizontal gene transfer facilitated the evolution of plant parasitic mechanisms in the oomycetes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Rooting the Eukaryote Tree by Using a Derived Gene Fusion , 2002, Science.

[46]  K. Katoh,et al.  MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  T. Richards,et al.  Ancient animal ancestry for nuclear myosin , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[48]  E. Birney,et al.  Pfam: the protein families database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[49]  T. Gabaldón,et al.  Acquisition of prokaryotic genes by fungal genomes. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[50]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Myosin domain evolution and the primary divergence of eukaryotes , 2005, Nature.

[51]  J. Spudich,et al.  Molecular evolution of the myosin family: relationships derived from comparisons of amino acid sequences. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  J. Johndrow,et al.  Sisyphus, the Drosophila myosin XV homolog, traffics within filopodia transporting key sensory and adhesion cargos , 2007, Development.

[53]  L. G. Davis,et al.  Basic methods in molecular biology , 1986 .

[54]  T Hodge,et al.  A myosin family tree. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[55]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Strong functional patterns in the evolution of eukaryotic genomes revealed by the reconstruction of ancestral protein domain repertoires , 2011, Genome Biology.

[56]  G. Manning,et al.  Genomic Survey of Premetazoans Shows Deep Conservation of Cytoplasmic Tyrosine Kinases and Multiple Radiations of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 2012, Science Signaling.

[57]  S. Loubéry,et al.  Membrane traffic in the secretory pathway , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[58]  C. Figdor,et al.  Myosin II and mechanotransduction: a balancing act. , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[59]  I. Ruiz-Trillo,et al.  A genomic survey shows that the haloarchaeal type tyrosyl tRNA synthetase is not a synapomorphy of opisthokonts. , 2012, European journal of protistology.

[60]  C. House,et al.  The tree of life viewed through the contents of genomes. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[61]  U. Gophna,et al.  The complexity hypothesis revisited: connectivity rather than function constitutes a barrier to horizontal gene transfer. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[62]  James A. Spudich,et al.  The myosin superfamily at a glance , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[63]  B. Foth,et al.  New insights into myosin evolution and classification. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  Samuel E. Fox,et al.  Expression, Splicing, and Evolution of the Myosin Gene Family in Plants1[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[65]  J. Berg,et al.  Myosin-X provides a motor-based link between integrins and the cytoskeleton , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[66]  F. Matsumura Regulation of myosin II during cytokinesis in higher eukaryotes. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[67]  J. Spudich,et al.  Structural and Functional Insights on the Myosin Superfamily , 2012, Bioinformatics and biology insights.

[68]  M. Peckham Coiled coils and SAH domains in cytoskeletal molecular motors. , 2011, Biochemical Society transactions.

[69]  Matthew W. Brown,et al.  The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes , 2012, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[70]  J. Berg,et al.  A millennial myosin census. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[71]  A. Sebé-Pedrós,et al.  A Genomic Survey of HECT Ubiquitin Ligases in Eukaryotes Reveals Independent Expansions of the HECT System in Several Lineages , 2013, Genome biology and evolution.

[72]  Kimmen Sjölander,et al.  Ortholog identification in the presence of domain architecture rearrangement , 2011, Briefings Bioinform..

[73]  Brett W. Engelmann,et al.  The SH2 Domain–Containing Proteins in 21 Species Establish the Provenance and Scope of Phosphotyrosine Signaling in Eukaryotes , 2011, Science Signaling.

[74]  M. Titus,et al.  An unconventional myosin required for cell polarization and chemotaxis , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  A. Simpson,et al.  Evolution: Revisiting the Root of the Eukaryote Tree , 2009, Current Biology.

[76]  G. Spudich,et al.  Myosin VI: cellular functions and motor properties. , 2004, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[77]  B Franz Lang,et al.  Unexpected repertoire of metazoan transcription factors in the unicellular holozoan Capsaspora owczarzaki. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[78]  T. Richards,et al.  Genome-scale comparative analysis of gene fusions, gene fissions, and the fungal tree of life , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Jeremy G. Wideman,et al.  The ancient and widespread nature of the ER-mitochondria encounter structure. , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[80]  L. Hug,et al.  Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups” , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  S. Loubéry,et al.  Myosins in the secretory pathway: tethers or transporters? , 2008, Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS.

[82]  J. Andersson,et al.  Lateral gene transfer in eukaryotes , 2005, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[83]  Florian Odronitz,et al.  Drawing the tree of eukaryotic life based on the analysis of 2,269 manually annotated myosins from 328 species , 2007, Genome Biology.

[84]  J. Lake,et al.  Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.