Demonstration of an optical-coherence converter

Studying the coherence of an optical field is typically compartmentalized with respect to its different physical degrees of freedom (DoFs)—spatial, temporal, and polarization. Although this traditional approach succeeds when the DoFs are uncoupled, it fails at capturing key features of the field’s coherence if the DOFs are indeed correlated—a situation that arises often. By viewing coherence as a “resource” that can be shared among the DoFs, it becomes possible to convert the entropy associated with the fluctuations in one DoF to another DoF that is initially fluctuation-free. Here, we verify experimentally that coherence can indeed be reversibly exchanged—without loss of energy—between polarization and the spatial DoF of a partially coherent field. Starting from a linearly polarized spatially incoherent field—one that produces no spatial interference fringes—we obtain a spatially coherent field that is unpolarized. By reallocating the entropy to polarization, the field becomes invariant with regard to the action of a polarization scrambler, thus suggesting a strategy for avoiding the deleterious effects of a randomizing system on a DoF of the optical field.

[1]  L. Ballentine,et al.  Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods , 1994 .

[2]  Omar Gamel,et al.  Causality and the complete positivity of classical polarization maps. , 2011, Optics Letters.

[3]  F. Gori Matrix treatment for partially polarized, partially coherent beams. , 1998, Optics letters.

[4]  Aristide Dogariu,et al.  Complex degree of mutual polarization. , 2004, Optics letters.

[5]  W. Steen,et al.  Principles of Optics M. Born and E. Wolf, 7th (expanded) edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, 952pp. £37.50/US $59.95, ISBN 0-521-64222-1 , 2000 .

[6]  Zach DeVito,et al.  Opt , 2017 .

[7]  D. James,et al.  Definitions of the degree of polarization of a light beam. , 2007 .

[8]  L. Mandel,et al.  Relationship between Jones and Mueller matrices for random media , 1987 .

[9]  N. Mermin Quantum theory: Concepts and methods , 1997 .

[10]  B. Saleh,et al.  Optical coherency matrix tomography , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[11]  A. Mackay On complexity , 2001 .

[12]  E. Wolf Unified theory of coherence and polarization of random electromagnetic beams , 2003 .

[13]  R. Martínez-Herrero,et al.  Maximum visibility under unitary transformations in two-pinhole interference for electromagnetic fields. , 2007, Optics letters.

[14]  P. Meystre Introduction to the Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light , 2007 .

[15]  G. Leuchs,et al.  Classical entanglement in polarization metrology , 2014, 1401.1543.

[16]  B. Saleh,et al.  Two-point optical coherency matrix tomography. , 2014, Optics letters.

[17]  F. Gori,et al.  Maximizing Young's fringe visibility through reversible optical transformations. , 2007, Optics letters.

[18]  Franco Gori,et al.  Vector mode analysis of a young interferometer. , 2006, Optics letters.

[19]  J. Gil Characteristic properties of Mueller matrices. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  M. Teich,et al.  Quantum entanglement and the two-photon Stokes parameters , 2001, quant-ph/0110172.

[21]  Mircea Mujat,et al.  A law of interference of electromagnetic beams of any state of coherence and polarization and the Fresnel-Arago interference laws. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  State transfer based on classical nonseparability , 2015, 1503.03807.

[23]  B. Saleh,et al.  Bell's measure in classical optical coherence , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[24]  Alexander L. Gaeta,et al.  Phase modulation at the few-photon level for weak-nonlinearity-based quantum computing , 2013 .

[25]  C. Brosseau,et al.  Chapter 4 – Symmetry properties and polarization descriptors for an arbitrary electromagnetic wavefield , 2006 .

[26]  L. Mandel,et al.  Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics , 1995 .

[27]  C. Brosseau Fundamentals of Polarized Light: A Statistical Optics Approach , 1998 .

[28]  A. Friberg,et al.  Complete electromagnetic coherence in the space-frequency domain. , 2004, Optics letters.

[29]  A. Abouraddy,et al.  Diffraction-free pulsed optical beams via space-time correlations. , 2016, Optics express.

[30]  J. Eberly,et al.  Entanglement and classical polarization states. , 2010, Optics letters.

[31]  Kevin J Parker,et al.  Longitudinal iso-phase condition and needle pulses. , 2016, Optics express.

[32]  A. Abouraddy What is the maximum attainable visibility by a partially coherent electromagnetic field in Young's double-slit interference? , 2017, Optics express.

[33]  G. Leuchs,et al.  Quantum−like nonseparable structures in optical beams , 2015 .

[34]  A. Friberg,et al.  Degree of coherence for electromagnetic fields. , 2003, Optics express.

[35]  K. Toussaint,et al.  Rapid Mueller matrix polarimetry based on parallelized polarization state generation and detection. , 2009, Optics express.

[36]  G. Leuchs,et al.  Classically entangled optical beams for high-speed kinematic sensing , 2015, 1504.00697.

[37]  F. Zernike The concept of degree of coherence and its application to optical problems , 1938 .

[38]  Andrew G. White,et al.  Measurement of qubits , 2001, quant-ph/0103121.

[39]  Demonstration of local teleportation using classical entanglement , 2016 .

[40]  F. Gori,et al.  Nonquantum entanglement resolves a basic issue in polarization optics. , 2010, Physical review letters.