HYBRID/ELECTRIC VEHICLE DESIGN OPTIONS AND EVALUATIONS

Various aspects of the design and evaluation of hybrid/electric vehicles are considered with emphasis on the consequences of utilizing advanced electric driveline components such as AC motors/electronics and ultracapacitors. Special attention is given to series hybrid drivelines, because they benefit much more directly than parallel hybrid drivelines from the recent large improvements in the specific weight and volume of electric drive motors/electronics. The results of the present study indicate that series hybrid vehicles with an electric range of 90-100 km and good acceleration performance (0-88 km/h acceleration times of less than 12 seconds) can be designed with a powertrain weight and volume comparable to that of a parallel hybrid of the same performance. The driveline efficiencies of the series and parallel designs for both city and highway driving differ by less than 15 percentage points. The control of the series hybrid driveline is expected to be significantly simpler than that of the parallel hybrid system and in addition, meeting the California ULEV emission standards should be less difficult for the series hybrid design, because the start of its engine can be delayed until the catalyst is warm without affecting vehicle driveability. Simulation results for series hybrid vehicles on the FUDS and the Federal Highway cycles indicate that their fuel economy (miles per gallon) operating in the hybrid mode will be 25-50% greater than conventional ICE vehicles of comparable interior size. Hybrid/electric vehicles using ultracapacitors to load level the engine in the driveline showed even a greater potential improvement in fuel economy. Load leveled operation of the engine may make it less difficult to use high specific power engines, such as two-stroke and gas-turbine engines, in light duty vehicles having stringent emission control requirements.

[1]  R J Freeman,et al.  Performance testing and system characterization. DOE Hybrid Test Vehicle, Phase III. Final report , 1984 .

[2]  Ingemar Denbratt,et al.  The volvo 5-cylinder engine with 4-valve technology―a new member of volvos modular engine family , 1991 .

[3]  Dankwart Eiermann,et al.  The Introduction of a New Ultra-Lite Multipurpose Wankel Engine , 1990 .

[4]  Robin Mackay Gas Turbine Generator Sets for Hybrid Vehicles , 1992 .

[5]  A. Kalberlah,et al.  Electric Hybrid Drive Systems for Passenger Cars and Taxis , 1991 .

[6]  H C Vivian,et al.  HYBRID VEHICLE ASSESSMENT. PHASE 1: PETROLEUM SAVINGS ANALYSIS , 1984 .

[7]  G H Cole,et al.  SIMULATION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES WITH HYBRID POWER SYSTEMS , 1990 .

[8]  John S. Reuyl XA-100 Hybrid Electric Vehicle , 1992 .

[9]  M.C. Trummel,et al.  Development history of the hybrid test vehicle , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Marc C. Trummel,et al.  Hybrid Vehicle Test Procedure Development , 1981 .

[11]  Rolf Brück,et al.  New Potential Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment Technologies for “Clean Car” Legislation , 1991 .

[12]  Alan L Miller,et al.  SCVT - A State of the Art Electronically Controlled Continuously Variable Transmission , 1991 .

[13]  A F Burke LABORATORY TESTING OF HIGH ENERGY DENSITY CAPACITORS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES , 1991 .

[14]  A. F. Burke Electric Vehicle Propulsion And Battery Technology 1975-1995 , 1990, Proceedings of the 25th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference.

[15]  Clarence Ellers The Evolution and Design of an Operational Hybrid/Electric Drive System , 1990 .

[16]  Andrew F. Burke,et al.  Impacts of Use-Pattern on the Design of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles , 1981 .