Anomaly Detection and Reconstruction From Random Projections

Compressed-sensing methodology typically employs random projections simultaneously with signal acquisition to accomplish dimensionality reduction within a sensor device. The effect of such random projections on the preservation of anomalous data is investigated. The popular RX anomaly detector is derived for the case in which global anomalies are to be identified directly in the random-projection domain, and it is determined via both random simulation, as well as empirical observation that strongly anomalous vectors are likely to be identifiable by the projection-domain RX detector even in low-dimensional projections. Finally, a reconstruction procedure for hyperspectral imagery is developed wherein projection-domain anomaly detection is employed to partition the data set, permitting anomaly and normal pixel classes to be separately reconstructed in order to improve the representation of the anomaly pixels.

[1]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  An Empirical Bayesian Strategy for Solving the Simultaneous Sparse Approximation Problem , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Constrained subpixel target detection for remotely sensed imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Signal Processing With Compressive Measurements , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[5]  Ying Liu,et al.  A Selective KPCA Algorithm Based on High-Order Statistics for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Distributed Compressed Sensing of Jointly Sparse Signals , 2005, Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005..

[7]  Victoria J. Hodge,et al.  A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[8]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  R. Muirhead Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory , 1982, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[10]  Dimitris Achlioptas,et al.  Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins , 2003, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[11]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[12]  I. Reed,et al.  Adaptive Optical Target Detection Using Correlated Images , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[13]  Amit Banerjee,et al.  A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Compressive-Projection Principal Component Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  J. Tropp Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part II: Convex relaxation , 2006, Signal Process..

[16]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Recovery Algorithms for Vector-Valued Data with Joint Sparsity Constraints , 2008, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[17]  Qian Du,et al.  Anomaly-Based JPEG2000 Compression of Hyperspectral Imagery , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part I: Greedy pursuit , 2006, Signal Process..

[19]  Rebecca Willett,et al.  Hyperspectral target detection from incoherent projections: Nonequiprobable targets and inhomogeneous SNR , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[20]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Reduce and Boost: Recovering Arbitrary Sets of Jointly Sparse Vectors , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  I. Reed,et al.  A Detection Algorithm for Optical Targets in Clutter , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[22]  E. Ashton,et al.  Algorithms for the Detection of Su b-Pixel Targets in Multispectral Imagery , 1998 .

[23]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR SIMULTANEOUS SPARSE APPROXIMATION , 2006 .

[24]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[25]  Alfonso Fernández-Manso,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2012 .

[26]  Maria Petrou,et al.  A Time-Efficient Method for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Sanjoy Dasgupta,et al.  An elementary proof of a theorem of Johnson and Lindenstrauss , 2003, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[28]  Enrico Magli,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Compression Employing a Model of Anomalous Pixels , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[29]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Multitask Compressive Sensing , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[30]  E. M. Winter,et al.  Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[31]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[32]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.