TRANSFERABILITY AND ROBUSTNESS OF PREDICTIVE MODELS TO PROACTIVELY ASSESS REAL-TIME FREEWAY CRASH RISK

This thesis describes the development and evaluation of real-time crash risk assessment models for four freeway corridors, US-101 NB (northbound) and SB (southbound) as well as I-880 NB and SB. Crash data for these freeway segments for the 16-month period from January 2010 through April 2011 are used to link historical crash occurrences with real-time traffic patterns observed through loop detector data. The analysis techniques adopted for this study are logistic regression and classification trees, which are one of the most common data mining tools. The crash risk assessment models are developed based on a binary classification approach (crash and non-crash outcomes), with traffic parameters measured at surrounding vehicle detection station (VDS) locations as the independent variables. The classification performance assessment methodology accounts for rarity of crashes compared to non-crash cases in the sample instead of the more common pre-specified threshold-based classification. Prior to development of the models, some of the data-related issues such as data cleaning and aggregation were addressed. Based on the modeling efforts, it was found that the turbulence in terms of speed variation is significantly associated with crash risk on the US-101 NB corridor. The models estimated with data from US-101 NB were evaluated based on their classification performance, not only on US-101 NB, but also on the other three freeways for transferability assessment. It was found that the predictive model derived from one freeway can be readily applied to other freeways, although the classification performance decreases. The models which transfer best to other roadways were found to be those that use the least number of VDSs–that is, using one upstream and downstream station rather than two or three. The classification accuracy of the models is discussed in terms of how the models can be used for real-time crash risk assessment, which may be helpful to authorities for freeway segments with newly installed traffic surveillance apparatuses, since the real-time crash risk assessment models from nearby freeways with existing infrastructure would be able to provide a reasonable estimate of crash risk. These models can also be applied for developing and testing variable speed limits (VSLs) and ramp metering strategies that proactively attempt to reduce crash risk. The robustness of the model output is assessed by location, time of day and day of week. The analysis shows that on some locations the models may require further learning due to higher than expected false positive (e.g., the I-680/I-280 interchange …

[1]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks and Logit Models for Traffic Safety Analysis of Toll Plazas , 2002 .

[2]  D. Collett,et al.  Modelling Binary Data , 1991 .

[3]  Sherif Ishak,et al.  Analysis of Freeway Traffic Incident Conditions by Using Second-Order Spatiotemporal Traffic Performance Measures , 2005 .

[4]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Relationship between Real-Time Traffic Surveillance Data and Rear-End Crashes on Freeways , 2006 .

[5]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[6]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  COMPARISON OF FUZZY AND NEURAL CLASSIFIERS FOR ROAD ACCIDENTS ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[7]  M. Abdel-Aty,et al.  Linking Roadway Geometrics and Real-Time Traffic Characteristics to Model Daytime Freeway Crashes: Generalized Estimating Equations for Correlated Data , 2004 .

[8]  Bruce N. Janson,et al.  Prediction Models for Truck Accidents at Freeway Ramps in Washington State Using Regression and Artificial Intelligence Techniques , 1998 .

[9]  Wilfred W Recker,et al.  Freeway safety as a function of traffic flow. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  S. Travis Waller,et al.  Active Traffic Management Strategies: Implications for Freeway Operations and Traffic Safety , 2011 .

[11]  Kevin N. Balke,et al.  Assessing Weather, Environment, and Loop Data for Real-Time Freeway Incident Prediction: , 2006 .

[12]  Chris Lee,et al.  Real-Time Crash Prediction Model for Application to Crash Prevention in Freeway Traffic , 2002 .

[13]  V. Sisiopiku,et al.  Relationship Between Volume-to-Capacity Ratios and Accident Rates , 1997 .

[14]  Haitham Al-Deek,et al.  NEW METHOD FOR ESTIMATING FREEWAY INCIDENT CONGESTION , 1995 .

[15]  Anurag Pande,et al.  Classification of real-time traffic speed patterns to predict crashes on freeways , 2003 .

[16]  T. Golob,et al.  Relationships Among Urban Freeway Accidents, Traffic Flow, Weather and Lighting Conditions , 2001 .

[17]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Enhancing the universality and transferability of freeway incident detection using a Bayesian-based neural network , 1999 .

[18]  Ruey Long Cheu,et al.  Automated detection of lane-blocking freeway incidents using artificial neural networks , 1995 .

[19]  Nour-Eddin El Faouzi,et al.  Real-Time Identification of Risk-Prone Traffic Patterns Taking into Account Weather Conditions , 2011 .

[20]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[21]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A Tool to Evaluate the Safety Effects of Changes in Freeway Traffic Flow , 2002 .

[22]  Sherif Ishak,et al.  Performance of Automatic ANN-Based Incident Detection on Freeways , 1999 .

[23]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Split Models for Predicting Multivehicle Crashes during High-Speed and Low-Speed Operating Conditions on Freeways , 2005 .

[24]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  Evaluating ITS strategies for real-time freeway safety improvement , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[25]  A Vorko,et al.  Multiple attribute entropy classification of school-age injuries. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  S Madanat,et al.  A PROTOTYPE SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME INCIDENT LIKELIHOOD PREDICTION , 1995 .

[27]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Spatiotemporal Variation of Risk Preceding Crashes on Freeways , 2005 .

[28]  S Y Sohn,et al.  Pattern recognition for road traffic accident severity in Korea , 2001, Ergonomics.

[29]  Chris Lee,et al.  Analysis of Crash Precursors on Instrumented Freeways , 2002 .

[30]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[31]  Chengcheng Xu,et al.  Exploration and Identification of Hazardous Traffic Flow States before Crash Occurrences on Freeways , 2011 .

[32]  Fedel Frank Saccomanno,et al.  Assessing Safety Benefits of Variable Speed Limits , 2004 .

[33]  Sherif Ishak,et al.  Impact of Freeway Geometric and Incident Characteristics on Incident Detection , 1996 .

[34]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[35]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Identifying crash propensity using specific traffic speed conditions. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[36]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Freeway Speeds and Speed Variations Preceding Crashes, Within and Across Lanes , 2010 .

[37]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Development of Artificial Neural Network Models to Predict Driver Injury Severity in Traffic Accidents at Signalized Intersections , 2001 .

[38]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Predicting Freeway Crashes from Loop Detector Data by Matched Case-Control Logistic Regression , 2004 .

[39]  L Mussone,et al.  An analysis of urban collisions using an artificial intelligence model. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  T. Golob,et al.  A Method for Relating Type of Crash to Traffic Flow Characteristics on Urban Freeways , 2002 .