Eysenck's theory of crime revisited: Factors or primary scales?

Purpose. This study aims to advance the original formulation of Eysenck's theory of criminality from the factorial level to suggest that primary scales of personality best determine reports of delinquency. Method. Two self-report studies were conducted. The first consisted of 101 students and the second used an additional 101 students. The first study used measures of Self-Reported Delinquency (SRD) and Socialisation (Gough & Peterson, 1952) and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised Edition (EPQ-R; H.J. Eysenck & Eysenck, 1991). The second study complemented the first study to utilize the EPQ-R and SRD only. Results. A series of exploratory hierarchical multiple entry regressions of the factors in the first study demonstrate that high Psychoticism predicts SRD, whereas high Psychoticism and Neuroticism predict Under-socialization. The primary scales of Disrespect for Rules, Depressed and Need for Stimulation significantly predict both criteria. The second study extends the first study through structural equation modelling to provide acceptable evidence of the concurrent validity of these primary scales with SRD. Conclusions. We propose that the significant primary scales of personality provide a clear reformulation of Eysenck's original theory of criminality as they explain the variance in delinquency and socialization in a systematic manner. Furthermore, primary scales provide a theoretical framework for behavioural interventions, as required by Blackburn (2000).

[1]  A Furnham,et al.  The structure of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[2]  A. Furnham.  Personality, social skills, anomie and delinquency: a self-report study of a group of normal non-delinquent adolescents. , 1984, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  B. Thompson,et al.  Factor Analytic Evidence for the Construct Validity of Scores: A Historical Overview and Some Guidelines , 1996 .

[4]  A. Raine.  Schizotypal and borderline features in psychopathic criminals , 1992 .

[5]  G. Gudjonsson,et al.  The Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire-Revised (GCQ-R) factor structure and its relationship with personality , 1999 .

[6]  D. Farrington,et al.  Abnormal offenders, delinquency, and the criminal justice system , 1982, Psychological Medicine.

[7]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. , 1993 .

[8]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less , 1996 .

[9]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  CRIME AND PERSONALITY: ITEM ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES , 1971 .

[10]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  A. Furnham.  Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation , 1986 .

[12]  P. Heaven.  Personality and self-reported delinquency: a longitudinal analysis. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[13]  B. Whitley,et al.  Gender Differences in Cheating Attitudes and Classroom Cheating Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1999 .

[14]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection , 1996 .

[15]  M. Zuckerman.  Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking , 1994 .

[16]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[17]  A. Furnham,et al.  Personality and self-reported delinquency , 1991 .

[18]  P. Costa,et al.  Four ways five factors are basic , 1992 .

[19]  P. Kline,et al.  Personality factors in the Eysenck personality questionnaire , 1980 .

[20]  H. Eysenck.  Personality and crime: Where do we stand , 1996 .

[21]  Leslie J. Francis,et al.  The dual nature of the EPQ lie scale among college students in England , 1991 .

[22]  H. Eysenck,et al.  The causes and cures of criminality , 1989 .

[23]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[24]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Personality and learning style: A study of three instruments , 1992 .

[25]  P. Heaven.  Personality and self-reported delinquency: Analysis of the “Big Five” personality dimensions , 1996 .

[26]  H. Eysenck.  Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of a paradigm. , 1997 .

[27]  H. Gough,et al.  The identification and measurement of predispositional factors in crime and delinquency. , 1952, Journal of consulting psychology.

[28]  S. B. G. Eysenck,et al.  Crime and Personality: An Empirical Study of the Three-Factor Theory , 1970 .

[29]  H. Gough.  Theory, Development, and Interpretation of the CPI Socialization Scale , 1994, Psychological reports.

[30]  R. Depue,et al.  Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  C. Jackson,et al.  Explaining the overlap between personality and learning style , 1996 .

[32]  R. Blackburn.  Treatment or incapacitation? Implications of research on personality disorders for the management of dangerous offenders , 2000 .