European stillbirth proportions before and after the Chernobyl accident.

BACKGROUND Numerous investigations have been carried out concerning the possible impact of the Chernobyl accident, in April 1986, on the prevalence of anomalies at birth and on perinatal mortality. The accident has contaminated Eastern Europe more heavily than Western Europe. If there was an effect of the radioactive contamination on perinatal mortality or stillbirth proportions one would expect to find it more pronounced in Eastern Europe as compared to Western Europe. We therefore studied long-term time trends in European stillbirth proportions. METHODS Linear logistic regression was applied to model the time trends in stillbirth proportions. Dummy variables were used to account for effects that can be associated with certain years or locations. A synoptic logistic regression model is suggested for the western, central, and eastern parts of Europe. RESULTS There is a marked differential effect in the long-term stillbirth time trends between Western Europe (Belgium, France, Great Britain, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain), Central Europe (Austria, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Norway, Switzerland), and Eastern Europe represented by four countries (Greece, Hungary, Poland, Sweden). In contrast to the western and central European trends, the eastern European trend exhibits an absolute increase of the stillbirth proportion in 1986 as compared with 1985 and an apparent upward shift of the whole trend line from 1986 on. CONCLUSION Our results are in contrast to those of many analyses of the health consequences of the Chernobyl accident and contradict the present radiobiological knowledge. As we are dealing with highly aggregated data, other causes or artefacts may explain the observed effects. Hence, the findings should be interpreted with caution and further independent evidence should be sought.

[1]  P. Holland,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis. , 1976 .

[2]  N. Dainiak,et al.  Morbidity in a large cohort study of children born to mothers exposed to radiation from chernobyl , 1997, Stem cells.

[3]  R. T. Lie,et al.  Outcome of Pregnancy in one Norwegian County 3 Years Prior to and 3 Years Subsequent to the Chernobyl Accident , 1990, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[4]  M. Joffe The accident at Chernobyl and outcome of pregnancy in Finland. , 1989, BMJ.

[5]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[6]  B. Grosche,et al.  Perinatal mortality in Bavaria, Germany, after the Chernobyl reactor accident , 1997, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[7]  R. Dahlhaus,et al.  Infant mortality after Chernobyl , 1990, The Lancet.

[8]  P. Hubert,et al.  Chernobyl, 10 years after: health consequences. , 1997, Epidemiologic reviews.

[9]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[10]  B. Grosche,et al.  Infant leukaemia after the Chernobyl accident , 1997, Nature.

[11]  D. Trichopoulos,et al.  Infant leukaemia after in utero exposure to radiation from Chernobyl , 1996, Nature.

[12]  L. Saxén,et al.  Pregnancy outcome in Finland after the Chernobyl accident. , 1991, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[13]  H Küchenhoff,et al.  Perinatal mortality in Germany following the Chernobyl accident , 1997, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[14]  William J. Schull,et al.  Radiation and the Sex Ratio in Man , 1958, Science.

[15]  W J Schull,et al.  Perinatal loss and neurological abnormalities among children of the atomic bomb. Nagasaki and Hiroshima revisited, 1949 to 1989. , 1990, JAMA.

[16]  M. Graffar [Modern epidemiology]. , 1971, Bruxelles medical.

[17]  J. Little The Chernobyl accident, congenital anomalies and other reproductive outcomes. , 1993, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[18]  J. Scheer,et al.  EARLY INFANT MORTALITY IN WEST GERMANY BEFORE AND AFTER CHERNOBYL , 1989, The Lancet.

[19]  H. Scherb,et al.  Regression analysis of time trends in perinatal mortality in Germany 1980-1993. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.