Wide-Range Stabilization of an Arm-Driven Inverted Pendulum Using Linear Parameter-Varying Techniques*

The purpose of the paper is to demon- strate the ability of LPV (Linear Parameter Vary- ing) control techniques to handle difficult nonlin- ear control problems. The focus in this paper is on the wide range stabilization of an arm-driven in- verted pendulum. Two different LPV control tech- niques are used to design nonlinear controllers that achieve stabilization of the pendulum over the max- imum range of operating conditions while providing time- and frequency-domain performances. The mer- its of each of these techniques are investigated and the improvements over more classical LTI (Linear Time-Invariant) control schemes such as #<» or y, controllers are discussed. A particular emphasis is put on the real-time implementation of these con- trollers for the inverted pendulum experiment. It is shown that suitable multi-objective extensions of the standard characterization of LPV controllers allow to cope with sampling rate implementation constraints. Finally, a complete validation of the proposed LPV controller structures is carried out through a set of realistic nonlinear simulations but also by means of physical experiment records.

[1]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  μ-analysis and synthesis toolbox: for use with Matlab , 1994 .

[2]  Tetsuya Iwasaki,et al.  All controllers for the general H∞ control problem: LMI existence conditions and state space formulas , 1994, Autom..

[3]  A. Packard Gain scheduling via linear fractional transformations , 1994 .

[4]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  A primal—dual potential reduction method for problems involving matrix inequalities , 1995, Math. Program..

[5]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Self-scheduled H∞ control of linear parameter-varying systems: a design example , 1995, Autom..

[6]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A convex characterization of gain-scheduled H∞ controllers , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Robot dynamics and control , 1989 .

[8]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[9]  Anders Helmersson,et al.  Methods for robust gain scheduling , 1995 .

[10]  A. Tits,et al.  Robustness in the presence of mixed parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics , 1991 .

[11]  P. Gahinet,et al.  H∞ design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  G. Scorletti,et al.  Improved linear matrix inequality conditions for gain scheduling , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  Carsten W. Scherer,et al.  Mixed H/sub 2//H/sub /spl infin// control for linear parametrically varying systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  P. Gahinet,et al.  General-Purpose LMI solvers with benchmarks , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[15]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Method of centers for minimizing generalized eigenvalues , 1993, Linear Algebra and its Applications.

[16]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A linear matrix inequality approach to H∞ control , 1994 .

[17]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  Theory of Robot Control , 1996 .