The potential effectiveness of young driver high-performance vehicle restrictions as used in Australia.

Young drivers persistently have higher crash rates despite various countermeasures targeted at their risk factors and exposures. A potentially high risk situation for novice drivers may feasibly include the driving of high performance vehicles, which are subject to restrictions for probationary and restricted drivers in four Australian States. High performance vehicles are capable of high levels of acceleration and speed, which may encourage unsafe driving behaviours, particularly when driven by novice drivers, who may lack appropriate judgement and experience. This research sought to identify potential safety benefits of restrictions on certain vehicles for novice drivers using crash data from Australia and New Zealand, and vehicle licensing data from New Zealand. Data on crashed vehicles and their drivers were analysed to estimate the prevalence of the high performance vehicles in the fleets considered, particularly when driven by young people. By matching New Zealand licensing data with crash data, it was possible to estimate the risk of these high performance vehicles relative to other vehicles in the fleet. For owners aged under 25, a statistically significant 69% elevated injury crash involvement risk ratio was estimated for the high performance vehicles subject to restrictions in Australia in comparison with their risk with other vehicles controlling for other relevant factors (with 95% CI 30-123%, using owners aged 40-59 as a comparison group). Injuries in the vehicles of young owners of high performance vehicles were estimated to increase compared to their rate in other vehicles by 101% (with 95% confidence interval 69-171%, using owners aged 40-59 as a comparison group). Despite the higher relative risk for the high performance vehicles, they were relatively rare in the fleets studied, and the potential reduction in young driver injury rates from banning these vehicles was estimated to range from 0.4% in New Zealand to 2.5% in the Australian States of Queensland and Victoria. In addition, the potential reductions estimated here also depend on unrealistic assumptions of 100% compliance with regulation and the adoption of less risky driving behaviour in response to lower performance vehicles. Although these vehicles have a statistically significantly higher crash and injury risk than other vehicles when owned by young people, there are considerable costs of implementation and ongoing enforcement in imposing vehicle restrictions for young drivers that may not outweigh these potential safety benefits.

[1]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Who Can Best Influence the Quality of Teenagers’ Cars? , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[2]  A F Williams,et al.  Young driver risk factors: successful and unsuccessful approaches for dealing with them and an agenda for the future , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[3]  Michael D Keall,et al.  Older Driver Crash Rates in Relation to Type and Quantity of Travel , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  B Scott-Parker,et al.  Mileage, Car Ownership, Experience of Punishment Avoidance, and the Risky Driving of Young Drivers , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  David D. Clarke,et al.  IN-DEPTH ACCIDENT CAUSATION STUDY OF YOUNG DRIVERS , 2002 .

[6]  W. Frith,et al.  The contribution of alcohol to night time crash risk and other risks of night driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  J Langley,et al.  Motorcycle engine size and risk of moderate to fatal injury from a motorcycle crash. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  VEHICLES DRIVEN BY TEENAGERS IN FOUR STATES , 1999 .

[9]  Stuart V Newstead,et al.  Rating the overall secondary safety of vehicles from real world crash data: the Australian and New Zealand Total Secondary Safety Index. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Teresa Senserrick,et al.  GRADUATED DRIVER LICENSING: EFFECTIVENESS OF SYSTEMS AND INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS , 2003 .

[12]  George Yannis,et al.  Driver age and vehicle engine size effects on fault and severity in young motorcyclists accidents. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Are SUVs dangerous vehicles? , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Nils Petter Gregersen,et al.  FROM CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE TO PERSONAL SELF-CONTROL; BROADENING THE PERSPECTIVES TO DRIVER EDUCATION , 2002 .

[15]  Bevan B. Kirley,et al.  Crashes of novice teenage drivers: characteristics and contributing factors. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[16]  J Langley,et al.  Impact of graduated driver licensing restrictions on crashes involving young drivers in New Zealand , 2001, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[17]  M S Horswill,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF CAR TYPE ON DRIVERS' RISK TAKING , 2001 .

[18]  A Gavin,et al.  The relationship between vehicle power to weight ratio and young driver crash involvement , 2005 .

[19]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .