Personalizing Mobile Travel Information Services

Research on Advanced Traveller Information Systems (ATIS) shows that travellers make better travel decisions when they are well informed. In the dynamic setting of urban public transport systems, however, the ability to be informed is not enough: travellers need to be able to quickly access and assess the information that is relevant to their own mobility. Unfortunately, most public transport ATIS are not tailored or personalised to meet individual needs. To personalise transport information services, the authors advocate for a multi-layered approach, integrating (1) implicit preference elicitations, (2) personalised route planning and execution, (3) natural language processing and (4) context-aware mobile interfaces. In particular, city residents use modern-day smart phones ubiquitously. Following the trend of “people as sensor”, these powerful devices can be used to sense how people travel (when, from where, to where, what mode, etc.), and, in doing so, thus elicit preferences (point 1). These preferences are more fine grained than what ATIS can now elicit from static web pages asking pre defined questions, allowing for more advanced route planning (point 2). Lastly, routes can now be requested and visualised on the go: smart interfaces, that free users from inputting requests via keyboard, and adapt based on what the user is currently doing, (e.g. if walking, running etc.) will ease user acceptance of the technology (points 3 and 4). In this paper, the authors discuss how state-of-the-art ATIS systems can become personalised services by including one or more of the following: data mining and natural language processing that can be used to learn travellers’ implicit preferences; trip planning and routing that is computed based on explicit preferences; and how smart-phone mobile phones can dynamically adapt to travellers’ surrounding environment and activities in order to maximise the relevance of the data they display.

[1]  Siobhán Clarke,et al.  CASS - Middleware for Mobile Context-Aware Applications , 1990 .

[2]  Jani Mäntyjärvi,et al.  An Ontology for Mobile Device Sensor-Based Context Awareness , 2003, CONTEXT.

[3]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Emotion rating from short blog texts , 2008, CHI.

[4]  A. Bayen,et al.  Mobile Transit Trip Planning with Real-Time Data , 2011 .

[5]  Rock Leung Improving the learnability of mobile device applications for older adults , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  Konstantinos G. Zografos,et al.  Algorithms for Itinerary Planning in Multimodal Transportation Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden , 2008, CHI.

[8]  Licia Capra,et al.  Mining Public Transport Usage for Personalised Intelligent Transport Systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[9]  Julia Schreiber Bridging the gap between useful and aesthetic maps in car navigation systems , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[10]  Hung Keng Pung,et al.  A middleware for building context-aware mobile services , 2004, 2004 IEEE 59th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2004-Spring (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37514).

[11]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Tacticycle: a tactile display for supporting tourists on a bicycle trip , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[12]  Léon J. M. Rothkrantz,et al.  Personal Intelligent Travel Assistant. A distributed approach , 2005, IC-AI.

[13]  Pascal Bouvry,et al.  Transfer Graph Approach for Multimodal Transport Problems , 2008, MCO.

[14]  Liqiu Meng,et al.  Algorithms of Multi-Modal Route Planning Based on the Concept of Switch Point , 2009 .

[15]  Werner Retschitzegger,et al.  Context-awareness on mobile devices - the hydrogen approach , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[16]  Abhinandan Das,et al.  Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering , 2007, WWW '07.

[17]  Káthia Marçal de Oliveira,et al.  A public transportation ontology to support user travel planning , 2010, 2010 Fourth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).

[18]  James A. Landay,et al.  The Mobile Sensing Platform: An Embedded Activity Recognition System , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[19]  Karl Rehrl,et al.  Assisting Multimodal Travelers: Design and Prototypical Implementation of a Personal Travel Companion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Sabine Schröder,et al.  Making a completely icon-based menu in mobile devices to become true: a user-centered design approach for its development , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[21]  Davide Calì,et al.  Improving intelligence through use of Natural Language Processing. A comparison between NLP interfaces and traditional visual GIS interfaces , 2011, ANT/MobiWIS.

[22]  Dominik Schultes,et al.  Route Planning in Road Networks , 2008 .

[23]  David M. Mark,et al.  User Interfaces for Geographic Information Systems: Report on the Specialist Meeting (92-3) , 1992 .

[24]  Chih-Hung Chang,et al.  Development of Trip Planning Systems on Public Transit in Taiwan , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control.

[25]  Varun Singh,et al.  Advanced traveler information system for Hyderabad City , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[26]  Vinny Cahill,et al.  A framework for developing mobile, context-aware applications , 2004, Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[27]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  A Standard-Based Integration Framework for Distributed Transit Trip Planning Systems , 2008, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[28]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[29]  Kun Zhou,et al.  Traveler Information Tool with Integrated Real-Time Transit Information and Multimodal Trip Planning , 2011 .