Design and test of neural networks and statistical classifiers in computer-aided movement analysis: a case study on gait analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the methods for designing and testing diagnostic systems in movement analysis and to verify the clinical usefulness of neural networks and statistical classifiers in a case study. DESIGN: Connectionist and statistical models trained and tested with measured data. BACKGROUND: A basic need in rehabilitation and related fields is to efficiently manage the vast information obtained from a movement analysis laboratory. Many studies have dealt with the interpretation of measured variables in order to correlate objective descriptors to the presence and/or severity of specific neuromusculoskeletal disorders or their consequences. This traditional analytical approach has been complemented in the last decade by new non-linear classification tools called neural networks. METHODS: A gait analysis study on 148 lower limb arthrosis patients and 88 age-matched control subjects. Pathological and healthy gait patterns obtained from force plates wer discriminated by means of multilayer perceptrons and statistical classifiers. RESULTS: Ten input features were enough to train a multilayer perceptron with six hidden neurons. The discrimination rate of the neural net was 80% after cross-validation, significantly higher (P<0.05) than the performance of a Bayes quadratic classifier (about 75%). A great variance due to a small cross-validation set could be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Strict statistical requirements must be observed for designing a neural network. Although these models attain a better performance than conventional statistical approaches, the benefits they bring are sometimes not sufficient to justify their use. Furthermore, clinicians routinely involved in critical decisions may not consider such diagnostic systems reliable enough.

[1]  J. G. Barton,et al.  Development of a connectionist expert system to identify foot problems based on under-foot pressure patterns. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .

[3]  D W Grieve,et al.  The use of neural networks to recognize patterns of human movement: gait patterns. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Effects of Sample Size in Classifier Design , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  J D Habbema,et al.  The Measurement of Performance in Probabilistic Diagnosis , 1978, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[6]  George A. Bekey,et al.  GAIT-ER-AID: An expert system for diagnosis of human gait , 1992, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[8]  H. C. Wood,et al.  A movement pattern generator model using artificial neural networks , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  James R. Gage,et al.  Gait Analysis: Principles and Applications , 1995 .

[10]  L. Nashner,et al.  Dynamic posturography in the diagnosis and management of dizziness and balance disorders. , 1990, Neurologic clinics.

[11]  D Caramella,et al.  Neural network segmentation of magnetic resonance spin echo images of the brain. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[12]  D A Winter Knowledge base for diagnostic gait assessments. , 1993, Medical progress through technology.

[13]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  Using causal reasoning in gait analysis , 1989, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[14]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[15]  G Jayaram,et al.  Experiments in dysarthric speech recognition using artificial neural networks. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  Richard P. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987 .

[17]  M. Pandy,et al.  Quantitative assessment of gait determinants during single stance via a three-dimensional model--Part 1. Normal gait. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Artificial neural networks and statistical pattern recognition : old and new connections , 1991 .

[19]  R H Rozendal,et al.  Vector diagrams in the evaluation of human gait. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  F M Amirouche,et al.  Analytical method for the analysis and simulation of human locomotion. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Parallel Networks that Learn to Pronounce English Text , 1987, Complex Syst..

[22]  R. Bartlett,et al.  The use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of sports performance: a review of applications in human gait analysis and future directions for sports biomechanics. , 1995, Journal of sports sciences.

[23]  T. Oberg,et al.  Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  R. N. Stauffer,et al.  Normative data of knee joint motion and ground reaction forces in adult level walking. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[26]  C L Vaughan,et al.  A neural network representation of electromyography and joint dynamics in human gait. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  M G Pandy,et al.  Quantitative assessment of gait determinants during single stance via a three-dimensional model--Part 2. Pathological gait. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  D.R. Hush,et al.  Progress in supervised neural networks , 1993, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[29]  S H Holzreiter,et al.  Assessment of gait patterns using neural networks. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A back-propagation neural network model of lumbar muscle recruitment during moderate static exertions. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  James M. Dzierzanowski,et al.  Gaitspert: An Expert System for the Evaluation of Abnormal Human Locomotion Arising from Stroke , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.