Conceptualizing multidisciplinary interaction by Gadamerian play for creating transdisciplinary knowledge

Introduction. The study aims at increasing understanding of knowledge creation in a multidisciplinary working community. The theoretical framework, based on H.G. Gadamer’s conceptualisation of play along with its three dimensions, may allow examination of a knowledge creation process when setting up a novel terminology on clean energy research. Method. The study is explorative and has features of auto-ethnography. Qualitative data consist of documents, videos, emails and notes. The empirical environment is a research and development consortium involving five disciplines. Analysis. The data are content analysed by applying the three dimensions of the Gadamerian play concept, namely, temporality, structure, and mode of being in play. Results. The framework was applicable to outline the process, which consisted of four phases. Of these, the third one focused on the interactive workshops for defining the final terms of the terminology. Three stages of this phase were identified, namely, Pre-clean energy research play, Semi-clean energy research play, and Deep-clean energy research play. These stages proceeded from multidisciplinary through interdisciplinary towards cross-disciplinary definition of the terms. Conclusion. The Gadamerian concept of play along with its dimensions is promising to examine knowledge creation in organisational settings. Future research may focus on a more comprehensive analysis of the data already collected in the study’s R&D environment.

[1]  Bernt Bull,et al.  Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1996 .

[2]  Marianne Lykke,et al.  A framework for work task based thesaurus design , 2001, J. Documentation.

[3]  Susann Wagenknecht,et al.  Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groups , 2012, Synthese.

[4]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[5]  Pamela J. McKenzie Informing relationships: small talk, informing and relationship building in midwife-woman interaction , 2010, Inf. Res..

[6]  Maija-Leena Huotari,et al.  A Methodology for Studying Knowledge Creation in Organizational Settings: A Phenomenological Viewpoint , 2016 .

[7]  David Bawden,et al.  Thesaurus Construction and Use: A Practical Manual , 2000 .

[8]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  The Co-Effects of Query Structure and Expansion on Retrieval Performance in Probabilistic Text Retrieval , 2004, Information Retrieval.

[9]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  WebExplorer: A TOOL FOR ONTOLOGY-BASED INFORMATION EXPLORATION , 2009 .

[10]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[11]  Ann,et al.  Truth and method , 1994, Journal of Religion and Health.

[12]  Sujatha Raman,et al.  Science advice for global challenges: learning from trade-offs in the IPCC , 2018 .

[13]  Anna Suorsa,et al.  Knowledge creation and play - a phenomenological approach , 2015, J. Documentation.

[14]  Juan C. Sager,et al.  A practical course in terminology processing , 1990 .

[15]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  The impact of query structure and query expansion on retrieval performance , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[16]  Eduardo García España Terminology , 1973, Hybrid Nuclear Energy Systems.

[17]  Maija-Leena Huotari,et al.  Knowledge creation and the concept of a human being: A phenomenological approach , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  John D. Aram,et al.  Concepts of Interdisciplinarity: Configurations of Knowledge and Action , 2004 .

[19]  Heewon Chang Autoethnography as Method , 2008 .

[20]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[21]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[22]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Towards better integration of environmental science in society: Lessons from BONUS, the joint Baltic Sea environmental research and development programme , 2017 .

[23]  Juan C. Sager,et al.  Terminology: Theory, methods and applications , 1999 .

[24]  Pamela J. McKenzie Informing choice: The organization of institutional interaction in clinical midwifery care , 2009 .

[25]  E. Salas,et al.  Facilitating Innovation in Diverse Science Teams Through Integrative Capacity , 2012 .

[26]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[27]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Subject access in online catalogs: A design model , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[29]  D. Hoang FLOW: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 2018 .

[30]  John M. Budd,et al.  Discourse Analysis and the Study of Communication in LIS , 2006, Libr. Trends.