Teaching Mathematical Problem Solving to Middle School Students in Math, Technology Education, and Special Education Classrooms

Abstract This study compared two approaches for teaching sixth-grade middle school students to solve math problems in math, technology education, and special education classrooms. A total of 17 students with disabilities and 76 students without disabilities were taught using either enhanced anchored instruction (EAI) or text-based instruction coupled with applied problems (TBI). Results showed that both EAI and TBI students benefited from instruction in their math class, but EAI students were able to maintain and transfer what they learned in the technology education classroom several weeks later. The performance level of students with disabilities was low in both groups, but additional small-group instruction in special education settings helped several students with disabilities achieve at levels commensurate with their peers without disabilities.

[1]  Joanna O. Masingila.  Learning from Mathematics Practice in Out-of-School Situations. , 1993 .

[2]  Mary Heinrichs,et al.  Weighing the Benefits of Anchored Math Instruction for Students with Disabilities in General Education Classes , 2002 .

[3]  J. Boaler.  Open and Closed Mathematics: Student Experiences and Understandings , 1998 .

[4]  J. Greeno.  THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[5]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[6]  C. D. Mercer,et al.  Educational Aspects of Mathematics Disabilities , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  Max F. Meyer,et al.  Psychology, a study of mental life. , 1922 .

[8]  Beliefs About Mathematics , 1989 .

[9]  John P. Smith,et al.  Tracking the Mathematics of Automobile Production: Are Schools Failing to Prepare Students for Work? , 1999 .

[10]  J. Kauffman,et al.  Commentary: Today's Special Education and Its Messages for Tomorrow , 1999 .

[11]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Applying Behavior-Analysis Procedures With Children and Youth , 1979 .

[12]  Margo A. Mastropieri,et al.  Mathematics Instruction for Learning Disabled Students: A Review of Research. , 1991 .

[13]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[14]  Samuel Richmond.  Report to the President on the Use of Technology to Strengthen K-12 Education in the United States , 1998 .

[15]  Edwin S. Ellis,et al.  Watering Up the Curriculum for Adolescents with Learning Disabilities-Part 2 , 1998 .

[16]  Brian A. Bottge,et al.  Reconceptualizing Mathematics Problem Solving for Low-Achieving Students , 2001 .

[17]  W. B. Pillsbury,et al.  Psychology, A Study of Mental Life. , 1922 .

[18]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving , 1988 .

[19]  John Wills Lloyd,et al.  Designing High-Quality Research in Special Education , 2000 .

[20]  Richard J. Murnane,et al.  Teaching The New Basic Skills , 1996 .

[21]  J. Woodward,et al.  The Effects of an Innovative Approach to Mathematics on Academically Low-Achieving Students in Inclusive Settings , 1997 .

[22]  Maggie Wheeler,et al.  National Educational Technology Standards for Students: Connecting Curriculum and Technology. , 2000 .

[23]  F. L. Wells.  Psychology: A Study of Mental Life. By R. S. Woodworth, Ph. D. (New York, Henry Holt & Co., 1921.) , 1922 .

[24]  Kenneth C. Gray.  Workforce Education: The Basics , 1997 .

[25]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[26]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[27]  Anthony W. Jackson,et al.  Turning Points 2000: Educating Adolescents in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[28]  John F. Cawley,et al.  Arithmetic Performance of Students: Implications for Standards and Programming , 2001 .

[29]  E. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). , 1901 .

[30]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Some observations on mental models , 1987 .

[31]  H. Swanson,et al.  Treatment Outcomes for Students with Learning Disabilities , 2001, Journal of learning disabilities.

[32]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[33]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  A guide to authentic instruction and assessment : vision, standards and scoring , 1995 .

[34]  Juliet A. Baxter,et al.  We Talk About It, But Do They Get It? , 2002 .

[35]  B. Bottge,et al.  A Comparison of Two Approaches for Teaching Complex, Authentic Mathematics Problems to Adolescents in Remedial Math Classes , 1993, Exceptional children.

[36]  Ronald C. Serlin,et al.  Anchoring Adolescents' Understanding of Math Concepts in Rich Problem-Solving Environments , 2001 .

[37]  Brian A. Bottge,et al.  Effects of Contextualized Math Instruction on Problem Solving of Average and Below-Average Achieving Students , 1999 .

[38]  P. J. Rea,et al.  Outcomes for Students with Learning Disabilities in Inclusive and Pullout Programs , 2002 .

[39]  M. Montague,et al.  Cognitive Strategy Instruction in Mathematics for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[40]  Allan S. Cohen,et al.  Using Item Response Theory to Assess Effects of Mathematics Instruction in Special Populations , 2001 .

[41]  A. Whitehead.  The aims of education , 1929 .

[42]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development , 1997 .

[43]  A. Lam.  Aims of education. , 1978, The Australian nurses' journal. Royal Australian Nursing Federation.